A split-face, evaluator-blind randomized study on the early effects of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser plus Er:YAG micropeel (combined therapy) versus Q-switched Nd:YAG alone in light solar lentigines in Asians.

Solar lentigines are a common sign of aging in Asians, who often asked for treatment. Various lasers, including Q-switched Nd:YAG and Er:YAG, have been adopted, but the results are not always satisfactory, especially for those who are relatively light in color. Our objective was to compare the early effects as well as side effects of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser plus Er:YAG micropeel (combined therapy) with those of Q-switched Nd:YAG laser (QSNY) alone in light solar lentigines in Asians. This was a split-face, evaluator-blind, randomized controlled study. A single session of treatment was performed on Asian patients with light facial lentigines. A combined treatment with QSNY and Er:YAG micropeel was allocated to one half of the face, and QSNY alone to the other half. The response to therapy was evaluated by two independent dermatologists, with standardized photographs taken 2 weeks and 1 month after the laser treatment. Patients' satisfaction and preference in treatment were also assessed. Fifteen patients completed the study and were analyzed. Overall, a reduction in pigment was observed with both treatment arms during the study period. The degree of pigment reduction following combined therapy and QSNY alone was similar at 2 weeks' follow-up (  = 0.433). However, due to the higher incidence of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) with combined therapy (73.3 vs 40%), the degree of pigment reduction in the combined side of the face was found significantly lower than that of the QSNY-alone side at 1-month follow-up (P = 0.014). Although our study results show that both combined therapy and QSNY alone are capable of reducing pigmentation, QSNY alone is considered to have more favorable qualities than combined treatment for light solar lentigines in Asians.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes