Literature DB >> 24291707

Common decision limits --The need for harmonised immunoassays.

Catharine M Sturgeon1.   

Abstract

The main aim of clinical guidelines is to encourage the best clinical outcome for patients and the best use of resources, no matter where patients are investigated or managed. Where guidelines incorporate decision limits based on levels of analytes in serum, plasma or urine these may determine whether or not to treat or may be used to tailor further treatment. Consideration should be given to the effect of method-related differences in results when implementing common decision limits. Available evidence suggests that for some analytes the implications for the patient may be serious, e.g. in terms of missed biopsies or unnecessary prostatic biopsies when prostate specific antigen is measured. Major causes of between-method differences are reviewed and means of addressing them considered.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcome; Decision limits; Method-related differences; Standardisation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24291707     DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


  6 in total

1.  Errors in the Extra-Analytical Phases of Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Testing.

Authors:  Annalise E Zemlin
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2017-05-05

2.  Comparison of Three Assays for Total and Free PSA Using Hybritech and WHO Calibrations.

Authors:  Manuel M Garrido; José C Marta; Ruy M Ribeiro; Luís C Pinheiro; Stefan Holdenrieder; João T Guimarães
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Generating method-specific Reference Ranges - A harmonious outcome?

Authors:  Graham R Lee; Alison Griffin; Kieran Halton; Maria C Fitzgibbon
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2017-07-05

4.  Improving Science by Overcoming Laboratory Pitfalls With Hormone Measurements.

Authors:  Jacquelien J Hillebrand; Wjera V Wickenhagen; Annemieke C Heijboer
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 5.  Perspective and priorities for improvement of parathyroid hormone (PTH) measurement - A view from the IFCC Working Group for PTH.

Authors:  Catharine M Sturgeon; Stuart Sprague; Alison Almond; Etienne Cavalier; William D Fraser; Alicia Algeciras-Schimnich; Ravinder Singh; Jean-Claude Souberbielle; Hubert W Vesper
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.786

6.  Comparison of two immunoassays for the measurement of serum HE4 for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Chloe E Barr; Garth Funston; Luke T A Mounce; Phillip W Pemberton; Jonathon D Howe; Emma J Crosbie
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2021-05-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.