Stephanie C Ems-McClung1, Sarah G Hainline2, Jenna Devare3, Hailing Zong2, Shang Cai3, Stephanie K Carnes2, Sidney L Shaw2, Claire E Walczak4. 1. Medical Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. 2. Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. 3. Department of Cellular and Molecular Biochemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. 4. Medical Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. Electronic address: cwalczak@indiana.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Proper spindle assembly and chromosome segregation rely on precise microtubule dynamics, which are governed in part by the kinesin-13 MCAK. MCAK microtubule depolymerization activity is inhibited by Aurora B-dependent phosphorylation, but the mechanism of this inhibition is not understood. RESULTS: Here, we develop the first Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based biosensor for MCAK and show that MCAK in solution exists in a closed conformation mediated by an interaction between the C-terminal domain (CT) and the neck. Using fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) we show that MCAK bound to microtubule ends is closed relative to MCAK associated with the microtubule lattice. Aurora B phosphorylation at S196 in the neck opens MCAK conformation and diminishes the interaction between the CT and the neck. Using FLIM and TIRF imaging, we find that changes in MCAK conformation are associated with a decrease in MCAK affinity for the microtubule. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike motile kinesins, which are open when doing work, the high-affinity binding state for microtubule-depolymerizing kinesins is in a closed conformation. Phosphorylation switches MCAK conformation, which inhibits its ability to interact with microtubules and reduces its microtubule depolymerization activity. This work shows that the conformational model proposed for regulating kinesin activity is not universal and that microtubule-depolymerizing kinesins utilize a distinct conformational mode to regulate affinity for the microtubule, thus controlling their catalytic efficiency. Furthermore, our work provides a mechanism by which the robust microtubule depolymerization activity of kinesin-13s can be rapidly modulated to control cellular microtubule dynamics.
BACKGROUND: Proper spindle assembly and chromosome segregation rely on precise microtubule dynamics, which are governed in part by the kinesin-13 MCAK. MCAK microtubule depolymerization activity is inhibited by Aurora B-dependent phosphorylation, but the mechanism of this inhibition is not understood. RESULTS: Here, we develop the first Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based biosensor for MCAK and show that MCAK in solution exists in a closed conformation mediated by an interaction between the C-terminal domain (CT) and the neck. Using fluorescence lifetime imaging (FLIM) we show that MCAK bound to microtubule ends is closed relative to MCAK associated with the microtubule lattice. Aurora B phosphorylation at S196 in the neck opens MCAK conformation and diminishes the interaction between the CT and the neck. Using FLIM and TIRF imaging, we find that changes in MCAK conformation are associated with a decrease in MCAK affinity for the microtubule. CONCLUSIONS: Unlike motile kinesins, which are open when doing work, the high-affinity binding state for microtubule-depolymerizing kinesins is in a closed conformation. Phosphorylation switches MCAK conformation, which inhibits its ability to interact with microtubules and reduces its microtubule depolymerization activity. This work shows that the conformational model proposed for regulating kinesin activity is not universal and that microtubule-depolymerizing kinesins utilize a distinct conformational mode to regulate affinity for the microtubule, thus controlling their catalytic efficiency. Furthermore, our work provides a mechanism by which the robust microtubule depolymerization activity of kinesin-13s can be rapidly modulated to control cellular microtubule dynamics.
Authors: Kathleen M Hertzer; Stephanie C Ems-McClung; Susan L Kline-Smith; Thomas G Lipkin; Susan P Gilbert; Claire E Walczak Journal: Mol Biol Cell Date: 2005-11-16 Impact factor: 4.138
Authors: Jennifer G DeLuca; Walter E Gall; Claudio Ciferri; Daniela Cimini; Andrea Musacchio; E D Salmon Journal: Cell Date: 2006-12-01 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Ayana T Moore; Kathleen E Rankin; George von Dassow; Leticia Peris; Michael Wagenbach; Yulia Ovechkina; Annie Andrieux; Didier Job; Linda Wordeman Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2005-05-09 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Arnaud Rondelet; Yu-Chih Lin; Divya Singh; Arthur T Porfetye; Harish C Thakur; Andreas Hecker; Pia Brinkert; Nadine Schmidt; Shweta Bendre; Franziska Müller; Lisa Mazul; Per O Widlund; Tanja Bange; Michael Hiller; Ingrid R Vetter; Alexander W Bird Journal: J Cell Biol Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 10.539
Authors: Martial Rey; Vladimir Sarpe; Kyle M Burns; Joshua Buse; Charles A H Baker; Marc van Dijk; Linda Wordeman; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; David C Schriemer Journal: Structure Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 5.006