Jin Lee1, Yueng-hsiang Huang2, Michelle M Robertson3, Lauren A Murphy4, Angela Garabet3, Wen-Ruey Chang3. 1. Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA; University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. 2. Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA. Electronic address: Yueng-hsiang.Huang@Libertymutual.com. 3. Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA. 4. Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA, USA; Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to examine the external validity of a 12-item generic safety climate scale for lone workers in order to evaluate the appropriateness of generalized use of the scale in the measurement of safety climate across various lone work settings. External validity evidence was established by investigating the measurement equivalence (ME) across different industries and companies. METHOD: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)-based and item response theory (IRT)-based perspectives were adopted to examine the ME of the generic safety climate scale for lone workers across 11 companies from the trucking, electrical utility, and cable television industries. RESULTS: Fairly strong evidence of ME was observed for both organization- and group-level generic safety climate sub-scales. Although significant invariance was observed in the item intercepts across the different lone work settings, absolute model fit indices remained satisfactory in the most robust step of CFA-based ME testing. IRT-based ME testing identified only one differentially functioning item from the organization-level generic safety climate sub-scale, but its impact was minimal and strong ME was supported. IMPLICATIONS: The generic safety climate scale for lone workers reported good external validity and supported the presence of a common feature of safety climate among lone workers. The scale can be used as an effective safety evaluation tool in various lone work situations.
PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to examine the external validity of a 12-item generic safety climate scale for lone workers in order to evaluate the appropriateness of generalized use of the scale in the measurement of safety climate across various lone work settings. External validity evidence was established by investigating the measurement equivalence (ME) across different industries and companies. METHOD: Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)-based and item response theory (IRT)-based perspectives were adopted to examine the ME of the generic safety climate scale for lone workers across 11 companies from the trucking, electrical utility, and cable television industries. RESULTS: Fairly strong evidence of ME was observed for both organization- and group-level generic safety climate sub-scales. Although significant invariance was observed in the item intercepts across the different lone work settings, absolute model fit indices remained satisfactory in the most robust step of CFA-based ME testing. IRT-based ME testing identified only one differentially functioning item from the organization-level generic safety climate sub-scale, but its impact was minimal and strong ME was supported. IMPLICATIONS: The generic safety climate scale for lone workers reported good external validity and supported the presence of a common feature of safety climate among lone workers. The scale can be used as an effective safety evaluation tool in various lone work situations.
Authors: Gregory D Kearney; Guadalupe Rodriguez; Sara A Quandt; Justin T Arcury; Thomas A Arcury Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Erin Shore; Liliana Tenney; Natalie V Schwatka; Miranda Dally; Lynn Dexter; Carol E Brown; Lee S Newman Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2021-08-30 Impact factor: 3.079
Authors: Natalie V Schwatka; Miranda Dally; Erin Shore; Liliana Tenney; Carol E Brown; Joshua G Scott; Lynn Dexter; Lee S Newman Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-05-24 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Natalie V Schwatka; Miranda Dally; Erin Shore; Lynn Dexter; Liliana Tenney; Carol E Brown; Lee S Newman Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-05-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Erin Shore; Natalie Schwatka; Miranda Dally; Carol E Brown; Liliana Tenney; Lee S Newman Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 2.306
Authors: Natalie V Schwatka; Robert R Sinclair; Wenyi Fan; Miranda Dally; Erin Shore; Carol E Brown; Liliana Tenney; Lee S Newman Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2020-05 Impact factor: 2.306
Authors: Carol E Brown; Lynn Dexter; Natalie V Schwatka; Miranda Dally; Liliana Tenney; Erin Shore; Lee S Newman Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-09-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Carol E Brown; Natalie Schwatka; Lynn Dexter; Miranda Dally; Erin Shore; Liliana Tenney; Lee S Newman Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 2.306