Literature DB >> 24290779

Diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation of benign from malignant lesions in the gallbladder.

N K Lee1, S Kim2, T U Kim3, D U Kim4, H I Seo5, T Y Jeon5.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the value of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating benign from malignant gallbladder lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six patients who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DWI, in whom the histopathological diagnosis of their gallbladder lesions was confirmed by biopsy or surgery were retrospectively analysed. Thirty-six malignant and 90 benign lesions were included. Two radiologists categorized gallbladder lesions into seven types on two imaging sets [T2-weighted imaging (WI) alone and combined T2WI and DWI (b = 800 s/mm(2))] according to the presence of wall thickening, layered patterns, morphology of the mass, and diffusion restriction. Disagreements were resolved in consensus. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of each imaging set for diagnosing gallbladder carcinoma were calculated. The diagnostic performance of each imaging set was calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Additionally, ADC values of malignant and benign gallbladder lesions were compared separately for 1.5 and 3 T MRI.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of diagnosis at T2WI were 97.2%, 86.7%, 74.5%, and 98.7%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV using combined T2WI and DWI were 97.2%, 92.2%, 83.3%, and 98.8%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy for gallbladder carcinoma slightly improved after adding DWI, from 0.92 to 0.95 (p < 0.05). ADC values for gallbladder carcinoma were significantly lower than those for benign lesions. Mean ADC values of malignant and benign lesions were 0.97 ± 0.25 × 10(-3) and 1.72 ± 0.56 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively, at 1.5 T (p < 0.001), and 1.04 ± 0.38 × 10(-3) and 2.2 ± 0.72 × 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively, at 3 T (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: DWI can improve diagnostic accuracy for differentiating benign from malignant gallbladder lesions.
Copyright © 2013 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24290779     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  11 in total

1.  Negative signals for adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder upon diffusion-weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression/T2-weighted image fusion analysis.

Authors:  Minoru Tomizawa; Fuminobu Shinozaki; Kazunori Fugo; Takafumi Sunaoshi; Eriko Sugiyama; Daisuke Kano; Misaki Shite; Ryouta Haga; Yoshiya Fukamizu; Satoshi Kagayama; Rumiko Hasegawa; Yoshinori Shirai; Yasufumi Motoyoshi; Takao Sugiyama; Shigenori Yamamoto; Takashi Kishimoto; Naoki Ishige
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  When to CHEUS contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound to assess gallbladder wall thickening.

Authors:  Gareth Morris-Stiff; Shahid Farid
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential marker for tumour differentiation, staging and long-term clinical outcomes in gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Ji Hye Min; Tae Wook Kang; Dong Ik Cha; Seong Hyun Kim; Kyung Sook Shin; Jeong Eun Lee; Kee-Taek Jang; Soo Hyun Ahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Histopathological Examination of Gallbladder Specimens in Kumaon Region of Uttarakhand.

Authors:  Sanjeev Kumar Shukla; Prabhat Pant; Govind Singh; K S Shahi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2020-03

5.  Computed diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with high b-values in the diagnosis of gallbladder lesions.

Authors:  Motokazu Sato; Yusuke Kurita; Eiji Sakai; Seitaro Watanabe; Haruto Sanada; Tomoki Shimizu; Kenji Kanoshima; Yusuke Takai; Koki Meguro; Yuichi Sugimoto; Yusuke Biwata; Kunihiro Hosono; Noritoshi Kobayashi; Kensuke Kubota; Atsushi Nakajima
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-06-29

6.  Optical diagnosis of gallbladder cancers via two-photon excited fluorescence imaging of unstained histological sections.

Authors:  Zhipeng Hong; Youting Chen; Jing Chen; Hong Chen; Yahao Xu; Xiaoqin Zhu; Shuangmu Zhuo; Zheng Shi; Jianxin Chen
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.161

7.  Diffusion-weighted whole-body magnetic resonance imaging with background body signal suppression/T2 image fusion for the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Minoru Tomizawa; Fuminobu Shinozaki; Satomi Tanaka; Takafumi Sunaoshi; Daisuke Kano; Eriko Sugiyama; Misaki Shite; Ryouta Haga; Yoshiya Fukamizu; Toshiyuki Fujita; Satoshi Kagayama; Rumiko Hasegawa; Yoshinori Shirai; Yasufumi Motoyoshi; Takao Sugiyama; Shigenori Yamamoto; Naoki Ishige
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 8.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in cancer: Reported apparent diffusion coefficients, in-vitro and in-vivo reproducibility.

Authors:  Maysam M Jafar; Arman Parsai; Marc E Miquel
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-28

Review 9.  Gallbladder Cancer in the 21st Century.

Authors:  Rani Kanthan; Jenna-Lynn Senger; Shahid Ahmed; Selliah Chandra Kanthan
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.375

10.  Progression to invasive cancer after snare polypectomy of intracholecystic papillary neoplasms during gallbladder stone removal by percutaneous transhepatic choledochoscopy: a case report.

Authors:  Chi Hyuk Oh; Seok Ho Dong
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.