Literature DB >> 24290741

The effect of rotating platform TKA on strain distribution and torque transmission on the proximal tibia.

Robert A Malinzak1, Scott R Small1, Renee D Rogge2, Derek B Archer2, Jordan W Oja2, Michael E Berend1, Merrill A Ritter1.   

Abstract

Limited experimental data exist comparing the mechanical response of the tibial cortex between fixed and rotating platform (RP) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), particularly in the revision setting. We asked if RP-TKA significantly affects tibiofemoral torque and cortical stain response in both the primary and revision settings. Fixed and RP tibial trays were implanted into analogue tibias and biomechanically tested under axial and torsional loading. Torque and strain response were analyzed using digital image correlation. Fixed bearing designs exhibited 13.8 times greater torque (P<0.01), and 69% (P<0.01) higher cortical strain than RP designs. Strain response was similar in the primary and revision cohorts. The decrease in torque transfer could act as a safeguard to reduce stress, micromotion and torsional fatigue in scenario of poor bone stock.
© 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TKA; digital image correlation; mobile bearing; rotating platform; strain; torque

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24290741     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  Rotational laxity and collateral ligament laxity following total knee arthroplasty with rotating platform.

Authors:  Hermann O Mayr; Maik Reinhold; Robert Hube; Philipp von Roth; Anke Bernstein; Norbert Suedkamp; Amelie Stoehr
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Fracture of the femoral adapter bolt and taper adapter in a modern rotating platform knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Elexis C Baral; Alexander S McLawhorn; Timothy M Wright; Edwin P Su
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2017-03-03

3.  Reduced tibial strain-shielding with extraosseous total knee arthroplasty revision system.

Authors:  Tomas A Correa; Bidyut Pal; Richard J van Arkel; Felice Vanacore; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Micromotion at the tibial plateau in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty: fixed versus rotating platform designs.

Authors:  S R Small; R D Rogge; R A Malinzak; E M Reyes; P L Cook; K A Farley; M A Ritter
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Does a PEEK Femoral TKA Implant Preserve Intact Femoral Surface Strains Compared With CoCr? A Preliminary Laboratory Study.

Authors:  Kathryn E Rankin; Alexander S Dickinson; Adam Briscoe; Martin Browne
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Biomechanical evaluation of tibial bone adaptation after revision total knee arthroplasty: A comparison of different implant systems.

Authors:  María Paz Quilez; Belen Seral; María Angeles Pérez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.