Literature DB >> 24290422

Salutogenically focused outcomes in systematic reviews of intrapartum interventions: a systematic review of systematic reviews.

Valerie Smith1, Deirdre Daly2, Ingela Lundgren3, Tine Eri4, Carina Benstoem5, Declan Devane6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: research on intrapartum interventions in maternity care has focused traditionally on the identification of risk factors' and on the reduction of adverse outcomes with less attention given to the measurement of factors that contribute to well-being and positive health outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of reviews to determine the type and number of salutogenically-focused reported outcomes in current maternity care intrapartum intervention-based research. For the conduct of this review, we interpreted salutogenic outcomes as those relating to optimum and/or positive maternal and neonatal health and well-being.
OBJECTIVES: to identify salutogenically-focused outcomes reported in systematic reviews of randomised trials of intrapartum interventions. REVIEW
METHODS: we searched Issue 9 (September) 2011 of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for all reviews of intrapartum interventions published by the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group using the group filter "hm-preg". Systematic reviews of randomised trials of intrapartum interventions were eligible for inclusion. We excluded protocols for systematic reviews and systematic reviews that had been withdrawn. Outcome data were extracted independently from each included review by at least two review authors. Unique lists of salutogenically and non-salutogenically focused outcomes were established.
RESULTS: 16 salutogenically-focused outcome categories were identified in 102 included reviews. Maternal satisfaction and breast feeding were reported most frequently. 49 non-salutogenically-focused outcome categories were identified in the 102 included reviews. Measures of neonatal morbidity were reported most frequently.
CONCLUSION: there is an absence of salutogenically-focused outcomes reported in intrapartum intervention-based research. We recommend the development of a core outcome data set of salutogenically-focused outcomes for intrapartum research.
© 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Keywords:  Intrapartum interventions; Salutogenesis; Salutogenically-focused outcomes; Systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24290422     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  14 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating outcomes used in cardiothoracic surgery interventional research: a systematic review of reviews to develop a core outcome set.

Authors:  Carina Benstoem; Ajay Moza; Rüdiger Autschbach; Christian Stoppe; Andreas Goetzenich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Maternal health coping strategies of migrant women in norway.

Authors:  Berit Viken; Anne Lyberg; Elisabeth Severinsson
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2015-03-17

3.  Emotions while awaiting lung transplantation: A comprehensive qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Aurelia Brügger; John-David Aubert; Chantal Piot-Ziegler
Journal:  Health Psychol Open       Date:  2014-12-11

4.  The perceptions and experiences of women who achieved and did not achieve a waterbirth.

Authors:  Lucy Lewis; Yvonne L Hauck; Caroline Crichton; Courtney Barnes; Corrinne Poletti; Helen Overing; Louise Keyes; Brooke Thomson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Protocol for the development of a salutogenic intrapartum core outcome set (SIPCOS).

Authors:  Valerie Smith; Deirdre Daly; Ingela Lundgren; Tine Eri; Cecily Begley; Mechthild M Gross; Soo Downe; Zarko Alfirevic; Declan Devane
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Be a Mom's Efficacy in Enhancing Positive Mental Health among Postpartum Women Presenting Low Risk for Postpartum Depression: Results from a Pilot Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Fabiana Monteiro; Marco Pereira; Maria Cristina Canavarro; Ana Fonseca
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Postpartum lifestyle interventions among women with pre-eclampsia: a scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Hege Selnes Haugdahl; Heidi Linn Sandsæter; Marianne Lysne; Ottar Bjerkeset; Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt; Julie Horn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Formative research in the development of a salutogenic early intervention home visiting program integrated in public child health service in a multiethnic population in Norway.

Authors:  Maria J Leirbakk; Johan Torper; Eivind Engebretsen; Jorunn Neerland Opsahl; Paula Zeanah; Jeanette H Magnus
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  The feasibility and acceptability of using the Mother-Generated Index (MGI) as a Patient Reported Outcome Measure in a randomised controlled trial of maternity care.

Authors:  Andrew Symon; Soo Downe; Kenneth William Finlayson; Rebecca Knapp; Peter Diggle
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  Assessing the performance of maternity care in Europe: a critical exploration of tools and indicators.

Authors:  Ramón Escuriet; Joanna White; Katrien Beeckman; Lucy Frith; Fatima Leon-Larios; Christine Loytved; Ans Luyben; Marlene Sinclair; Edwin van Teijlingen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.