| Literature DB >> 24290275 |
Abstract
There has been considerable investigation of host-microbial interactions in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in hopes of elucidating mechanisms of disease and better treatment. Most attention has been paid to bacterial infection and potential underlying defects in innate immunity. Bacterial biofilm is present in most patients with CRS undergoing surgical intervention, and its presence is associated with more severe disease and worse surgical outcomes. A role for viral or fungal infection in patients with CRS is less clear. There is no evidence for a primary defect in mucociliary clearance in most patients with CRS. Decreased levels of certain antimicrobial proteins, most notably lactoferrin, have been found in sinus secretions, whereas levels of other antimicrobial proteins have been found to be normal. No primary defects in Toll-like receptors have been found in patients with CRS, although a 50% reduced expression of Toll-like receptor 9 was reported in patients with recalcitrant nasal polyps. A polymorphism in a bitter taste receptor was recently associated with refractory CRS and persistent Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. A downregulation of innate immunity by maladaptive TH2 tissue inflammation has also been described in patients with recalcitrant nasal polyps, suggesting a link to persistent infection. To date, an effective means of restoring host-microbial balance and mitigating disease in patients with CRS remains elusive.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic rhinosinusitis; antimicrobial; biofilm; host; immunity; innate; microbial
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24290275 PMCID: PMC7112254 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.06.049
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol ISSN: 0091-6749 Impact factor: 10.793
Summary of studies of bacterial or fungal biofilm in patients with CRS
| Study | Method of biofilm detection | Specific bacterial species identified | Patients with CRS (no. positive/total studied) | Healthy subjects (no. positive/total studied) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cryer et al, 2004 | SEM | No specific probes used | 4/16 | — |
| Ferguson and Stolz, 2005 | TEM | 2/4 | — | |
| Sanclement et al, 2005 | SEM/TEM | No specific probes used | 24/30 | 0/4 |
| Sanderson et al, 2006 | FISH/CSLM | 14/18 | 2/5 | |
| Psaltis et al, 2007 | CSLM | 17/38 | 0/9 | |
| Foreman et al, 2009 | FISH/CSLM | 36/50 (11/50 positive for fungi) | 0/10 | |
| Hekiert et al, 2009 | SEM | No specific probes used | 17/60 | — |
| Galli et al, 2008 | SEM | 10/24 | 0/20 | |
| Singhal et al, 2010 | FISH/CSLM | No specific probes used | 36/51 | — |
| Zernotti et al, 2010 | CSLM ( | No specific probes used | 2/12 patients with CRS/NP | 0/10 |
| Foreman et al, 2010 | LIVE/DEAD BacLight Bacterial Viability Kit using CSLM compared with FISH/CSLM | No specific probes used | 15/20 Positive for biofilm with each technique but 18/20 positive by ≥1 technique | |
| Hochstim et al, 2010 | Hematoxylin and eosin staining plus FISH/CSLM with bacteria-specific probe EUB338 | No specific probes used Universal bacteria-specific probe EUB338 | 15/24 | 1/10 |
EUB338 is a “universal” bacterial probe used in FISH.
Fig 1Structure of the sinus epithelium, submucosal mixed seromucinous glands, and stroma and summary of proteins and peptides produced by sinus mucosal cells of potential relevance to innate or adaptive immune responses. Seromucinous glands are stained positively for CXCL1 (GRO-α). Adapted from references 13 and 71 to 83. *The NGAL protein was observed in the epithelium, infiltrating inflammatory cells, and submucosal gland of NPs but was rarely detected in normal inferior turbinate tissue. MBL-associated serine protease (MASP) 1 and 2 and MBL are soluble proteins that can arise in sinus secretions from plasma.
Pattern recognition receptors involved in microbial recognition by airway epithelial cells, their microbial ligands, and abnormalities described in patients with CRS†, ∗
| Receptor | Ligand | Relevant pathogens | Key innate signaling events in airway epithelial cells | Abnormalities described in patients with CRS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLR2 | Peptidoglycan, lipoteichoic acid, and lipoprotein from gram-positive bacteria, lipoarabinomannan from mycobacteria, and zymosan from yeast cell wall | Gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria; fungi ( | Increased production of hBD-2 and IL-8 | Increased expression of TLR2 in patients with recalcitrant CRS |
| TLR3 | Viral double-stranded RNA (dsRNA); polyinosine-polycytidylic acid (poly[I:C]) is a synthetic analog of dsRNA. | Rhinovirus, other viruses | Increased type I and type III interferon levels; chemokines (IL-8, GRO-α, RANTES, CXCL10); hBD-2, hBD-3 | Exaggerated response to TLR3 plus cigarette smoke extract with excess production of RANTES and hBD-2 |
| TLR4 (including CD14 and MD2 on cell surface) | LPS (facilitated by LPS-binding protein) | Gram-negative bacteria; | NF-κB and activation of proinflammatory cytokine genes, including IL-8 and hBD-2 | Reduced level of expression of TLR4, TLR7, and MyD88 in patients with CRSsNP compared with control subjects |
| TLR7/8 | Single-stranded RNAs (natural ligands); small synthetic molecules: imidazoquinolines and nucleoside analogs | Viruses | NF-κB and activation of proinflammatory cytokine genes | Reduced level of expression of TLR4, TLR7, and MyD88 in patients with CRSsNP compared with control subjects |
| TLR9 | Specific unmethylated CpG oligonucleotide (ODN) sequences (CpG DNA) | Bacteria | Production of IL-8 | Decreased baseline expression of TLR9 in patients with CRSwNP; decreased TLR9 in cultured AECs in response to IL-4 and IL-13 |
| Dectin receptors | β-Glucans from fungi | Production of TNF-α, GM-CSF, IL-8, hBD-2, and hBD-9 | None | |
| Bitter taste receptors | Functional responses to pathogen-derived quorum-sensing molecules | NO production, stimulation of mucociliary clearance and direct antibacterial effects | TAS2R38 genotype correlated with | |
| NOD1 (intracellular receptor) | iE-DAP | Recognition of bacterial/viral PAMPs | NF-κB and activation of proinflammatory cytokine genes | None |
| NOD2 (intracellular receptor) | Muramyl dipeptide (MDP), a component of peptidoglycan | Recognition of bacterial/viral PAMPs | NF-κB and activation of proinflammatory cytokine genes | None |
TLR ligand information source: http://www.invivogen.com/tlr2-ligands.
AEC, Airway epithelial cells; MyD88, myeloid differentiation pathway response gene (88); NF-κB, nuclear factor κB; PAMP, peptidoglycan recognition protein.
TLR1, TLR5, TLR6, and TLR10 are not included because there are no reports of abnormalities in these TLRs associated with CRS.
Adapted from Bals and Heimstra, Ooi et al, and Roeder et al.
Bacterial DNA containing unmethylated CpG dinucleotides.
Fig 2Salient features of host-microbial interactions involved in triggering innate immune responses in patients with CRS. TLR signaling pathways induce proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine production. Bitter taste receptor is activated by a quorum-sensing molecule from P aeruginosa and stimulates production of NO, which then stimulates mucocociliary clearance and has direct antimicrobial effects. Depiction of the intracellular TLR signaling pathways was adapted from the IAVI Report (http://www.iavireport.org/Back-Issues/Pages/IAVI-Report-9(4)-TollBridgetoImmunity.aspx). Upper right inset (left panel), SEM of bacterial biofilm showing characteristic glycocalyx and water channels. The photograph was used with permission from Sanclement et al.Right panel, CSLM image (×63 magnification) of a patient with CRS stained with the BacLight LIVE/DEAD kit (Invitrogen, Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, Calif) demonstrating a bacterial biofilm comprised of many intensely fluorescing live bacteria organized in clusters (large arrow). Small arrows designate the larger live and dead epithelial cells. Used with permission from Psaltis et al. The bitter taste receptor depicted in the small middle inset was adapted from Fenech C, Patrikainen L, Kerr DS, Grall S, Liu Z, Laugerette F, et al. Ric-8A, a Gα protein guanine nucleotide exchange factor potentiates taste receptor signaling. Front Cell Neurosci 2009;3:11.
Fig 3Normal host response to microbial infection (left panel) versus maladaptive TH2 response (right panel). The maladaptive TH2 response has been best demonstrated in patients with NPs and pertains to patients with CRSwNP.