S C E Chapman1, R Horne2, A Chater1, D Hukins3, W H Smithson4. 1. Centre for Behavioural Medicine, Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK. 2. Centre for Behavioural Medicine, Department of Practice and Policy, UCL School of Pharmacy, London, UK. Electronic address: r.horne@ucl.ac.uk. 3. NEYNL CLRN, St John's University, York, UK. 4. Academic Unit of Primary Medical Care, Medical School, Samuel Fox House, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can result in suboptimal outcomes for patients. AIM: This study aimed to assess the utility of a theory-based approach to understanding patient perspectives on AEDs and adherence. METHOD: Patients with epilepsy, identified by a GP case note review, were mailed validated questionnaires assessing their perceptions of AEDs and their adherence to them. RESULTS: Most (84.9%) of the 398 AED-treated respondents accepted the necessity of AEDs, but over half expressed doubts, with 55% disagreeing or uncertain about the statement 'I would prefer to take epilepsy medication than risk a seizure'. Over a third (36.4%) expressed strong concerns about the potential negative effects of AEDs. We used self-report and medication possession ratio to classify 36.4% of patients as nonadherent. Nonadherence was related to beliefs about medicines and implicit attitudes toward AEDs (p<0.05). Adherence-related attitudes toward AEDs were correlated with general beliefs about pharmaceuticals (BMQ General: General Harm, General Overuse, and General Benefit scales) and perceptions of personal sensitivity to medicines (PSM scale). CONCLUSION: We identified salient, adherence-related beliefs about AEDs. Patient-centered interventions to support medicine optimization for people with epilepsy should take account of these beliefs.
BACKGROUND: Nonadherence to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) can result in suboptimal outcomes for patients. AIM: This study aimed to assess the utility of a theory-based approach to understanding patient perspectives on AEDs and adherence. METHOD:Patients with epilepsy, identified by a GP case note review, were mailed validated questionnaires assessing their perceptions of AEDs and their adherence to them. RESULTS: Most (84.9%) of the 398 AED-treated respondents accepted the necessity of AEDs, but over half expressed doubts, with 55% disagreeing or uncertain about the statement 'I would prefer to take epilepsy medication than risk a seizure'. Over a third (36.4%) expressed strong concerns about the potential negative effects of AEDs. We used self-report and medication possession ratio to classify 36.4% of patients as nonadherent. Nonadherence was related to beliefs about medicines and implicit attitudes toward AEDs (p<0.05). Adherence-related attitudes toward AEDs were correlated with general beliefs about pharmaceuticals (BMQ General: General Harm, General Overuse, and General Benefit scales) and perceptions of personal sensitivity to medicines (PSM scale). CONCLUSION: We identified salient, adherence-related beliefs about AEDs. Patient-centered interventions to support medicine optimization for people with epilepsy should take account of these beliefs.
Keywords:
Antiepileptic drugs; Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ); Epilepsy; Medicine adherence; Perceived Sensitivity to Medicines (PSM) scale; Primary care
Authors: Samuel Waller Terman; Wesley T Kerr; Carole E Aubert; Chloe E Hill; Zachary A Marcum; James F Burke Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Freddy J K Toloza; Sarah E Theriot; Naykky M Singh Ospina; Sameen Nooruddin; Brooke Keathley; Stacey M Johnson; Nalin Payakachat; Elena Ambrogini; Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez; Derek T O'Keeffe; Juan P Brito; Victor M Montori; Nafisa K Dajani; Spyridoula Maraka Journal: Thyroid Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 6.568