Literature DB >> 24290148

Reducing questionnaire length did not improve physician response rate: a randomized trial.

Eva E Bolt1, Agnes van der Heide2, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of reducing questionnaire length on the response rate in a physician survey. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: A postal four double-page questionnaire on end-of-life decision making was sent to a random sample of 1,100 general practitioners, 400 elderly care physicians, and 500 medical specialists. Another random sample of 500 medical specialists received a shorter questionnaire of two double pages. After 3 months and one reminder, all nonresponding physicians received an even shorter questionnaire of one double page.
RESULTS: Total response was 64% (1,456 of 2,269 eligible respondents). Response rate of medical specialists for the four double-page questionnaire was equal to that of the two double-page questionnaire (190 and 191 questionnaires were returned, respectively). The total response rate increased from 53% to 64% after sending a short one double-page questionnaire (1,203-1,456 respondents).
CONCLUSION: The results of our study suggest that reducing the length of a long questionnaire in a physician survey does not necessarily improve response rate. To improve response rate and gather more information, researchers could decide to send a drastically shortened version of the questionnaire to nonresponders.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Data collection; Health-care surveys; Physician surveys; Questionnaire design; Questionnaire length; Response rate

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24290148     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  8 in total

1.  Telephone vs. Web-based prescreening predicts early but not overall physician response to a mailed survey.

Authors:  Hillary Bonuedie; Esther Kim; Judith Long; Kira Ryskina
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Medical end-of-life practices among Canadian physicians: a pilot study.

Authors:  Isabelle Marcoux; Antoine Boivin; Laura Mesana; Ian D Graham; Paul Hébert
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-05-05

3.  From Epidemic to Pandemic: Comparing Hospital Staff Emotional Experience Between MERS and COVID-19.

Authors:  Imran Khalid; Maryam Imran; Manahil Imran; Muhammad Ali Akhtar; Saifullah Khan; Khadija Amanullah; Tabindeh Jabeen Khalid
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2021-12

4.  Healthcare Workers Emotions, Perceived Stressors and Coping Strategies During a MERS-CoV Outbreak.

Authors:  Imran Khalid; Tabindeh J Khalid; Mohammed R Qabajah; Aletta G Barnard; Ismael A Qushmaq
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2016-02-04

5.  A new survey to evaluate conflict of interest policies at academic medical centers.

Authors:  Marcia Hams; Wells G Wilkinson; Lynn Zentner; Cory Schmidt; Raed A Dweik; Matthew Karafa; Susannah L Rose
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  How short or long should be a questionnaire for any research? Researchers dilemma in deciding the appropriate questionnaire length.

Authors:  Hunny Sharma
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2022-01-04

7.  Development and Evaluation of the Clinical Trial HEalth Knowledge and Beliefs Scale (CHEKS).

Authors:  Alicia Chung; Tiffany Donley; Ron D Hays; Rebecca Robbins; Azizi Seixas; Girardin Jean-Louis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Allowing Physicians to Choose the Value of Compensation for Participation in a Web-Based Survey: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Alison E Turnbull; Cristi L O'Connor; Bryan Lau; Scott D Halpern; Dale M Needham
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.