Literature DB >> 24289948

Evaluating the environmental impact of artificial sweeteners: a study of their distributions, photodegradation and toxicities.

Ziye Sang1, Yanan Jiang1, Yeuk-Ki Tsoi1, Kelvin Sze-Yin Leung2.   

Abstract

While having a long tradition as safe food additives, artificial sweeteners are a newly recognized class of environmental contaminants due to their extreme persistence and ubiquitous occurrence in various aquatic ecosystems. Resistant to wastewater treatment processes, they are continuously introduced into the water environments. To date however, their environmental behavior, fate as well as long term ecotoxicological contributions in our water resources still remain largely unknown. As a first step in the comprehensive study of artificial sweeteners, this work elucidates the geographical/seasonal/hydrological interactions of acesulfame, cyclamate, saccharin and sucralose in an open coast system at an estuarine/marine junction. Higher occurrence of acesulfame (seasonal average: 0.22 μg L(-1)) and sucralose (0.05 μg L(-1)) was found in summer while saccharin (0.11  μg L(-1)) and cyclamate (0.10 μg L(-1)) were predominantly detected in winter. Seasonal observations of the four sweeteners suggest strong connections with the variable chemical resistance among different sweeteners. Our photodegradation investigation further projected the potential impact of persistent acesulfame and sucralose compounds under prolonged exposure to intensive solar irradiation. Real-time observation by UPLC-ESI/MS of the degradation profile in both sweeteners illustrated that formation of new photo by-products under prolonged UV irradiation is highly viable. Interestingly, two groups of kinetically behaved photodegradates were identified for acesulfame, one of which was at least six times more persistent than the parent compound. For the first time, acute toxicity for the degradates of both sweeteners were arbitrarily measured, revealing photo-enhancement factors of 575 and 17.1 for acesulfame and sucralose, respectively. Direct comparison of photodegradation results suggests that the phototoxicity of acesulfame degradation products may impact aquatic ecosystems. In an attempt to neutralize this prolonged environmental threat, the feasibility of UV/TiO2 as an effective mineralization process in wastewater treatment was evaluated for both sweeteners. Under an environmental and technical relevant condition, a >84% removal rate recorded within 30 min and complete photomineralization was achieved within 2 h and delivering the best cost efficiency comparing to existing removal methods. A compilation of distribution, degradation, toxicity and attenuation results presented in this paper will go through critical discussions to explore some current issues and to pinpoint solutions for a better control in the emergent contamination of artificial sweeteners.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial sweetener; Emerging environmental contaminant; Photodegradation; Phototoxicity; UV/TiO(2) photocatalysis; Wastewater treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24289948     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  11 in total

1.  What Are We Putting in Our Food That Is Making Us Fat? Food Additives, Contaminants, and Other Putative Contributors to Obesity.

Authors:  Amber L Simmons; Jennifer J Schlezinger; Barbara E Corkey
Journal:  Curr Obes Rep       Date:  2014-06-01

2.  Degradation of artificial sweeteners via direct and indirect photochemical reactions.

Authors:  Noora Perkola; Sanna Vaalgamaa; Joonas Jernberg; Anssi V Vähätalo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Removal of micropollutants through a biological wastewater treatment plant in a subtropical climate, Queensland-Australia.

Authors:  Miguel Antonio Reyes Cardenas; Imtiaj Ali; Foon Yin Lai; Les Dawes; Ricarda Thier; Jay Rajapakse
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2016-11-03

4.  Biodegradation of the artificial sweetener acesulfame in biological wastewater treatment and sandfilters.

Authors:  Sandro Castronovo; Arne Wick; Marco Scheurer; Karsten Nödler; Manoj Schulz; Thomas A Ternes
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Fate of artificial sweeteners through wastewater treatment plants and water treatment processes.

Authors:  Shaoli Li; Yuhang Ren; Yingying Fu; Xingsheng Gao; Cong Jiang; Gang Wu; Hongqiang Ren; Jinju Geng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Photocatalytic Degradation of 4-Nitrophenol by C, N-TiO2: Degradation Efficiency vs. Embryonic Toxicity of the Resulting Compounds.

Authors:  Oluwatomiwa A Osin; Tianyu Yu; Xiaoming Cai; Yue Jiang; Guotao Peng; Xiaomei Cheng; Ruibin Li; Yao Qin; Sijie Lin
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 7.  Environmental Impact of the Presence, Distribution, and Use of Artificial Sweeteners as Emerging Sources of Pollution.

Authors:  Ab Qayoom Naik; Tabassum Zafar; Vinoy Kumar Shrivastava
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 8.  A Review of the Environmental Fate and Effects of Acesulfame-Potassium.

Authors:  Kerry Belton; Edward Schaefer; Patrick D Guiney
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 2.992

9.  Measuring Artificial Sweeteners Toxicity Using a Bioluminescent Bacterial Panel.

Authors:  Dorin Harpaz; Loo Pin Yeo; Francesca Cecchini; Trish H P Koon; Ariel Kushmaro; Alfred I Y Tok; Robert S Marks; Evgeni Eltzov
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Dual-high-frequency from single-piezoelectric crystal for ACE degradation by hybrid advanced oxidation UV-sonochemistry process.

Authors:  Fabiola Mendez-Arriaga; Chad D Vecitis
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 7.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.