| Literature DB >> 24288514 |
Abstract
Eight carrageenophytes, representing seven genera and three families of Gigartinales (Florideophyceae), were studied for 15 months. The reproductive status, dry weight, and carrageenan content have been followed by a monthly random sampling. The highest carrageenan yields were found in Chondracanthus acicularis (61.1%), Gigartina pistillata (59.7%), and Chondracanthus teedei var. lusitanicus (58.0%). Species of Cystocloniaceae family produces predominantly iota-carrageenans; Gigartinaceae family produces hybrid kappa-iota carrageenans (gametophytic plants) and lambda-family carrageenans (sporophytic plants); Phyllophoraceae family produces kappa-iota-hybrid carrageenans. Quadrate destructive sampling method was used to determine the biomass and line transect. Quadrate nondestructive sampling method, applied along a perpendicular transect to the shoreline, was used to calculate the carrageenophytes cover in two periods: autumn/winter and spring/summer. The highest cover and biomass were found in Chondrus crispus (3.75%-570 g/m(2)), Chondracanthus acicularis (3.45%-99 g/m(2)), Chondracanthus teedei var. lusitanicus (2.45%-207.5 g/m(2)), and Mastocarpus stellatus (2.02%-520 g/m(2)).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24288514 PMCID: PMC3826440 DOI: 10.1155/2013/939830
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Biomass, yield, and carrageenan composition.
| Family | Species | Biomass (gm−2) (dry weight) | Lifecycle phase | Harvest season | Carrageenan | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield(1) | Letter code(2) | Alkali-extracted(3) (%mol) | Native(4) | |||||
| Cystocloniaceae |
| 10.3 ± 1.3 ( | NF | Spring | 20.0 ± 1.7 ( | G4S-DA2S | 100 |
|
|
| 11.0 ± 0.5 ( | T | Spring | 28.4 ± 1.3 ( | G4S-DA2S, G4S-DA | 98 |
| |
|
| 11.3 ± 0.3 ( | FG | Spring | 40.4 ± 3.2 ( | G4S-DA2S | 100 |
| |
|
| ||||||||
| Gigartinaceae |
| 24.2 ± 1.8 ( | NF | Summer | 61.1 ± 2.9 ( | G4S-DA, G4S-DA2S | — |
|
|
| 37.5 ± 2.6 | T | Summer | 36.6 ± 3.7 ( | G2S-D2S, G2S-DA2S | 59 |
| |
|
| 24.3 ± 1.6 ( | FG | Late summer | 49.8 ± 2.4 ( | G4S-DA, G4S-DA2S | 61 |
| |
|
| 12.2 ± 2.2 ( | NF | Late summer | 41.0 ± 4.4 ( | G4S-DA, G4S-DA2S | 56 |
| |
|
| 15.3 ± 1.7 ( | T | Summer | 58.0 ± 8.0 ( | G2S-D2S, G2S-DA2S | 67 |
| |
|
| 14.1 ± 1.7 ( | FG | Late summer | 57.4 ± 6.0 ( | G4S-DA, G4S-DA2S | 58 |
| |
|
| 22.0 ± 0.7 ( | NF | Late summer | 36.0 ± 1.8 ( | G4S-DA, G4S-DA2S | 64 |
| |
|
| 23.3 ± 0.6 ( | FG | Summer | 36.8 ± 2.2 ( | G4S-DA, G4S-DA2S | 70 |
| |
|
| 24.2 ± 0.5 ( | T | Summer | 58.0 ± 2.8 ( | G2S-D2S, 6S | 100 |
| |
|
| 22.9 ± 0.7 ( | T | Late summer | 57.0 ± 2.8 ( | G2S-D2S, G2S-D2S, 6S | — |
| |
|
| 21.2 ± 0.8 ( | H ( | Summer | 58.5 ± 2.4 ( | G2S-D2S, G2S-D2S, 6S | — |
| |
|
| 20.4 ± 0.5 ( | FG | Summer | 59.7 ± 2.7 ( | G4S-DA, G4S-DA2S | 48 |
| |
|
| 20.8 ± 0.6 ( | H (♀) | Summer | 58.5 ± 2.6 ( | G4S-DA, G4S-DA2S | 49 |
| |
|
| ||||||||
| Phyllophoraceae |
| 22.8 ± 1.2 ( | G | Summer | 13.6 ± 0.5 ( | G4S-DA2S, G4S-DA | 82 |
|
|
| 18.4 ± 1.3 ( | TB | Late spring | 23.3 ± 1.4 ( | G4S-DA, G4S-DA2S | 64 |
| |
|
| 28.4 ± 0.6 ( | NF | Late summer | 41.4 ± 2.0 ( | G4S-DA, G4S-DA2S | 62 |
| |
|
| 20.9 ± 2.1 ( | FG | Late summer | 41.0 ± 2.0 ( | G4S-DA, G4S-DA2S | 59 |
| |
T: tetrasporophyte; FG: female gametophyte; G: gametophyte; NF: nonfructified thalli; TB: tetrasporopblastic thalli; H: heterosporic thalli: (♀ cistocarpic branch; ⊕ tetrasporic branch); (1) yields (maximum value found) expressed as a percentage of dry weight ± standard error; (3)composition determined by 1H-NMR; (4)composition determined by FTIR-ATR and FT-Raman analysis of ground seaweed samples; the carrageenans are identified according to the Greek lettering system and letter code (2)proposed by Knutsen et al. [3]; the letters between parentheses ( ) correspond to the biological precursors of the carrageenans, present in native carrageenan samples (or ground seaweed). Kappa (κ), Mu (μ), Iota (ι), Nu (ν), Theta (θ), Lambda (λ), and Xi (ξ).
Figure 1Carrageenophytes dry weight expressed as the percentage of fresh weight and carrageenan yields expressed as the percentage of dry weight (average ± standard error, n = 13).
Figure 2Carrageenophytes coverage in autumn/winter and spring/summer (average ± standard error, n = 46).
Figure 3Population structure of Chondrus crispus in Buarcos bay.
Figure 4Population structure of Mastocarpus stellatus in Buarcos bay.
Figure 5Population structure of Chondracanthus teedei var. lusitanicus in Buarcos bay.
Figure 6Population structure of Calliblepharis jubata in Buarcos bay.