Literature DB >> 24288397

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for T-staging of gallbladder carcinoma: emphasis on liver invasion.

J Hwang1, Y K Kim, D Choi, H Rhim, W J Lee, S S Hong, H-J Kim, Y-W Chang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with an emphasis on the usefulness of the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) in T-staging of gallbladder carcinoma.
METHODS: 66 patients with surgically confirmed gallbladder carcinoma underwent MRI. Two radiologists independently reviewed two sets of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI without and with the HBP. Local tumour spread was evaluated according to T-staging, and the results were compared with pathological findings. The diagnostic performance of two image sets to differentiate each T-stage was compared.
RESULTS: The sensitivities of MRI with the HBP to differentiate T1 vs ≥ T2 lesions, ≤ T2 vs ≥ T3 lesions and ≤ T3 vs T4 lesions were 96.3%, 85.7% and 100% for Observer 1 and 92.6%, 95.2% and 100% for Observer 2, respectively (p<0.0001). By adding the HBP, the sensitivities to differentiate ≤ T2 vs ≥ T3 lesions were increased from 66.7% to 85.7% for Observer 1 and from 81.0% to 95.2% for Observer 2, although there was no significant difference (p>0.05). The overall accuracies for T-staging were increased from 80.3% to 86.4% for Observer 1, a statistically significant degree (p=0.046), and from 83.8% to 87.9% for Observer 2 (p>0.05). The k-value for the two observers indicated excellent agreement.
CONCLUSION: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI provided acceptable diagnostic performance for T-staging of gallbladder carcinoma. Addition of the HBP aids in the detection of liver invasion. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: In the T-staging of gallbladder carcinoma, gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with the HBP may enhance detection of liver invasion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24288397      PMCID: PMC3898979          DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20130608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  24 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance differentiation between T2 and T1 gallbladder carcinoma: significance of subserosal enhancement on the delayed phase dynamic study.

Authors:  Kengo Yoshimitsu; Yunosuke Nishihara; Daisuke Okamoto; Yasuhiro Ushijima; Akihiro Nishie; Koji Yamaguchi; Akinobu Taketomi; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  On comparisons of sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of a number of diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  B M Bennett
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Preoperative evaluation of gallbladder carcinoma: efficacy of combined use of MR imaging, MR cholangiography, and contrast-enhanced dual-phase three-dimensional MR angiography.

Authors:  Jung Hoon Kim; Tae Kyoung Kim; Hyo Won Eun; Bong Soo Kim; Moon-Gyu Lee; Pyo Nyun Kim; Hyun Kwon Ha
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Primary carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Authors:  J W Roberts; S F Daugherty
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Authors:  L H Barr; F H Wright
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Helical CT of the local spread of carcinoma of the gallbladder: evaluation according to the TNM system in patients who underwent surgical resection.

Authors:  Kengo Yoshimitsu; Hiroshi Honda; Kenji Shinozaki; Hitoshi Aibe; Toshiro Kuroiwa; Hiroyuki Irie; Kazuo Chijiiwa; Yoshiki Asayama; Kouji Masuda
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Primary carcinoma of the gallbladder.

Authors:  R E Hamrick; F J Liner; P R Hastings; I Cohn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  K Ouchi; Y Owada; S Matsuno; T Sato
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 10.  Consensus report of the 4th International Forum for Gadolinium-Ethoxybenzyl-Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Jeong Min Lee; Christoph J Zech; Luigi Bolondi; Eduard Jonas; Myeong-Jin Kim; Osamu Matsui; Elmar M Merkle; Michiie Sakamoto; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.500

View more
  3 in total

1.  Determining the extent of cholecystectomy using intraoperative specimen ultrasonography in patients with suspected early gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Ji Hoon Park; Young Hoon Kim; Haeryoung Kim; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Young Rok Choi; Jai Young Cho; Yoon Jin Lee; Ho-Seong Han
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Preoperative Assessment and Perioperative Management of Resectable Gallbladder Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine and Novel Technologies: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Gianluca Cassese; Ho-Seong Han; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Jun Suh Lee; Jai Young Cho; Hae-Won Lee; Boram Lee; Roberto Ivan Troisi
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05

3.  Extended Resections for Advanced Gallbladder Cancer: Results from a Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  H Kuipers; E A J de Savornin Lohman; M van Dooren; A E Braat; F Daams; R van Dam; J I Erdmann; J Hagendoorn; F J H Hoogwater; B Groot Koerkamp; T M van Gulik; P R de Reuver; M T de Boer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 5.344

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.