Literature DB >> 24287396

Multidetector computerized tomography enema versus magnetic resonance enema in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis.

Ennio Biscaldi1, Simone Ferrero2, Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore3, Valentino Remorgida4, Pier Luigi Venturini5, Gian Andrea Rollandi6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of multidetector computerized tomography enema (MDCT-e) and magnetic resonance enema (MRI-e) in determining the presence of sigmoid and rectal endometriotic nodules.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 260 women (32.6 ± 4.3 years) with symptoms suggestive of rectosigmoid endometriosis underwent MDCT-e and MRI-e prior to laparoscopy. After retrograde colonic distention and injection of intravenous contrast medium, patients were scanned on a 64-row MDCT scanner. MRI-e was performed on a 1.5T magnet using an 8 channels phased array coil; intestinal distention was achieved by introducing in the rectum 250-300 ml of ultrasonographic gel diluted with saline solution. Radiological findings were compared with surgical and histological results.
RESULTS: 176 women had rectosigmoid endometriosis at surgery. There was no significant difference in the accuracy of MDCT-e (98.5%) and MRI-e (96.9%) in the diagnosis of sigmoid and rectal endometriosis (p=0.248). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio of MDCT-e and MRI-e were respectively 98.3%, 98.8%, 99.4%, 96.5%, 81.59, 0.02 and 97.2%, 96.4%, 98.3%, 94.1%, 26.89, 0.03.
CONCLUSIONS: Both MDCT-e and MRI-e are accurate in the diagnosis of rectal and sigmoid endometriosis.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bowel endometriosis; Enema; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multidetector computerized tomography; Rectum; Sigmoid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24287396     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  4 in total

Review 1.  Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

Authors:  Vicki Nisenblat; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Cindy Farquhar; Neil Johnson; M Louise Hull
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-26

2.  The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Planning of Surgical Treatment of Deep Pelvic Endometriosis.

Authors:  Francesco Manti; Caterina Battaglia; Iennarella Bruno; Michele Ammendola; Giuseppe Navarra; Giuseppe Currò; Domenico Laganà
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-28

3.  A Prospective Study Comparing Three-Dimensional Rectal Water Contrast Transvaginal Ultrasonography and Computed Tomographic Colonography in the Diagnosis of Rectosigmoid Endometriosis.

Authors:  Fabio Barra; Ennio Biscaldi; Carolina Scala; Antonio Simone Laganà; Valerio Gaetano Vellone; Cesare Stabilini; Fabio Ghezzi; Simone Ferrero
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-24

4.  Rectal water contrast transvaginal ultrasound versus double-contrast barium enema in the diagnosis of bowel endometriosis.

Authors:  Jipeng Jiang; Ying Liu; Kun Wang; Xixiang Wu; Ying Tang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.