OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychometric properties of the French-language version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC). METHODS: Data were obtained from a staff survey at a Swiss multisite hospital. We computed descriptive statistics and internal consistency coefficients, then conducted a confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis, and performed construct validity tests. RESULTS: 1171 staff members participated (response rate 74%). The internal consistency coefficients of the 12 dimension scores ranged from 0.57 to 0.86 (median 0.73). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a reasonable but not perfect fit of the hypothesised measurement model (root mean square error of approximation 0.043, comparative fit index 0.89). Exploratory data analysis suggested 10 dimensions instead of 12, grouping items from teamwork across hospital units with those of hospital handoffs and transitions, and items from communication openness with those of feedback and communication about error. However, the loading pattern was clean: 41 of 42 main loadings exceeded 0.40, and only 3 of 378 cross-loadings exceeded 0.30. All 10 process scores were higher among respondents who rated the global safety grade as 'excellent' or 'very good' rather than 'good', 'fair' or 'poor' (effect sizes 0.41-0.79, all p<0.001), but score differences between those who have and have not reported an incident in the past year were weak or inconsistent with theory. DISCUSSION: The French version of the HSOPSC did not perform as well as the original in standard psychometric analyses.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychometric properties of the French-language version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC). METHODS: Data were obtained from a staff survey at a Swiss multisite hospital. We computed descriptive statistics and internal consistency coefficients, then conducted a confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis, and performed construct validity tests. RESULTS: 1171 staff members participated (response rate 74%). The internal consistency coefficients of the 12 dimension scores ranged from 0.57 to 0.86 (median 0.73). Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a reasonable but not perfect fit of the hypothesised measurement model (root mean square error of approximation 0.043, comparative fit index 0.89). Exploratory data analysis suggested 10 dimensions instead of 12, grouping items from teamwork across hospital units with those of hospital handoffs and transitions, and items from communication openness with those of feedback and communication about error. However, the loading pattern was clean: 41 of 42 main loadings exceeded 0.40, and only 3 of 378 cross-loadings exceeded 0.30. All 10 process scores were higher among respondents who rated the global safety grade as 'excellent' or 'very good' rather than 'good', 'fair' or 'poor' (effect sizes 0.41-0.79, all p<0.001), but score differences between those who have and have not reported an incident in the past year were weak or inconsistent with theory. DISCUSSION: The French version of the HSOPSC did not perform as well as the original in standard psychometric analyses.
Authors: Maike V Tietschert; Federica Angeli; Arno J A van Raak; Dirk Ruwaard; Sara J Singer Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Carmen Tereanu; Scott Alan Smith; Mugurel Stefan Ghelase; Giuseppe Sampietro; Adrian Molnar; Antoaneta Dragoescu; Florentina Ligia Furtunescu; Camelia Stanescu; Olguta Alice Gavrila; Anca Patrascu; Andreea Loredana Golli; Manuela Dragomir Journal: Maedica (Bucur) Date: 2018-03
Authors: Leif Inge K Sørskår; Eirik B Abrahamsen; Espen Olsen; Stephen J M Sollid; Håkon B Abrahamsen Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-10-17 Impact factor: 2.655