Literature DB >> 24287177

Do-it-yourself healthcare: the current landscape, prospects and consequences.

Pricivel M Carrera1, Andrew R H Dalton2.   

Abstract

The wider availability and increasing use of mHealth tools - covering health applications, smartphone plug-ins and gadgets is significant for healthcare. This trend epitomises broader trajectories in access to and delivery of healthcare, with greater consumer involvement and decentralisation. This shift may be conceptualised as 'do-it-yourself Healthcare' - allowing consumers to monitor and manage their health, and guide their healthcare consumption. Technology that enables data collection by patients informs them about vital health metrics, giving them more control over experiences of health or illness. The information can be used alone as empowered consumers or together with healthcare professionals in an environment of patient-centred care. Current evidence suggests a large scope for do-it-yourself Healthcare, given the availability of technologies, whilst mHealth tools enhance diagnostics, improve treatment, increase access to services and lower costs. There are, however, limitations to do-it-yourself Healthcare. Notably, its evidence base is less well developed than the availability of technologies to facilitate it. A more complex model and understanding is needed to explain motivations for and consequences of engaging in do-it-yourself Healthcare. That said, its introduction alongside existing medicine may improve quality and reduce costs - potentially improving health system sustainability whilst future generations - tomorrow's middle-aged and the elderly, will become more conducive to its spread.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthcare access; Healthcare system; Patient-centred care; Utilization of healthcare; mHealth

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24287177     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.10.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  8 in total

Review 1.  The role of mobile technologies in health care processes: the case of cancer supportive care.

Authors:  Greta Nasi; Maria Cucciniello; Claudia Guerrazzi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Changes in urination according to the sound of running water using a mobile phone application.

Authors:  Whi-An Kwon; Sung Han Kim; Sohee Kim; Jae Young Joung; Jinsoo Chung; Kang Hyun Lee; Sang-Jin Lee; Ho Kyung Seo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Commercial Smartphone-Based Devices and Smart Applications for Personalized Healthcare Monitoring and Management.

Authors:  Sandeep Kumar Vashist; E Marion Schneider; John H T Luong
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2014-08-18

4.  Perceptions of Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Their Physiotherapists Regarding the Use of an eHealth Intervention.

Authors:  Sigrid Vorrink; Chantal Huisman; Helianthe Kort; Thierry Troosters; Jan-Willem Lammers
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2017-09-19

5.  Pediatric Speech-Language Pathologists' Use of Mobile Health Technology: Qualitative Questionnaire Study.

Authors:  Kelsey Thompson; Emily Zimmerman
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2019-09-26

6.  Digitally Supported Dietary Protein Counseling Changes Dietary Protein Intake, Sources and Distribution in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.

Authors:  Jantine van den Helder; Sjors Verlaan; Michael Tieland; Jorinde Scholten; Sumit Mehra; Bart Visser; Ben J A Kröse; Raoul H H Engelbert; Peter J M Weijs
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Implementation of Out-of-Office Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Netherlands: From Clinical Guidelines to Patients' Adoption of Innovation.

Authors:  Pricivel M Carrera; Mattijs S Lambooij
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Stakeholder Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators for the Adoption of Virtual Clinical Trials: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Romée Melanie Helena Coert; James Kenneth Timmis; André Boorsma; Wilrike J Pasman
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.428

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.