Literature DB >> 24286796

The shape and the thickness of the anterior cruciate ligament along its length in relation to the posterior cruciate ligament: a cadaveric study.

Eleni Triantafyllidi1, Nikolaos K Paschos, Anna Goussia, Nektaria-Marianthi Barkoula, Dimitrios A Exarchos, Theodore E Matikas, Vassiliki Malamou-Mitsi, Anastasios D Georgoulis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shape of the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) along its length in relation to the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and compare it with the size of the 3 commonly used autografts (bone-patellar tendon-bone [BPTB], single-bundle hamstring, and double-bundle hamstring).
METHODS: With the knee in extension, we filled the intercondylar notch with paraffin, fixing the cruciate ligaments in their natural position, in 8 cadaveric specimens. The ACL-PCL tissue specimen, embedded in paraffin, was removed en bloc. Gross sections were prepared in the coronal plane and were evaluated histologically. The width, thickness, and cross-sectional area of both the ACL and PCL were determined. The dimensions of the semitendinosus tendon (ST), gracilis tendon (GT), and BPTB grafts were measured and compared with those of the native ACL.
RESULTS: The PCL occupies the largest part of the intercondylar area, leaving only a small space for the ACL in knee extension. The ACL midsubstance has a width of 5 mm, resembling a band shape. Only before its tibial insertion does the ACL fan out and take the form of its tibial attachment. The BPTB graft has a thickness of 5.8 mm, whereas the ST and GT grafts have a thickness of 6.25 mm and 4.5 mm, respectively, and are comparable to the midsubstance of the ACL but undersized in the tibial insertion (P = .0016 for BPTB graft, P = .002 for ST graft, and P = .0003 for GT graft). A quadruple-looped ST-GT graft, with a diameter of 8 mm, is oversized in the midsubstance (P = .0002) but fits better in the tibial attachment.
CONCLUSIONS: The ACL midsubstance has a width of 5 mm, resembling a band shape. Before its tibial insertion, the ACL fans out like a trumpet, taking the form of its wide tibial attachment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The dimensions of the native ACL have to be considered in graft selection for anatomic ACL reconstruction.
Copyright © 2013 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24286796     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  11 in total

1.  Anatomic ACL reconstruction: the normal central tibial footprint position and a standardised technique for measuring tibial tunnel location on 3D CT.

Authors:  B Parkinson; R Gogna; C Robb; P Thompson; T Spalding
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  A more flattened bone tunnel has a positive effect on tendon-bone healing in the early period after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Fengyuan Zhao; Xiaoqing Hu; Jiahao Zhang; Weili Shi; Bo Ren; Hongjie Huang; Yingfang Ao
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Systematic Review of Cadaveric Studies on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Anatomy Focusing on the Mid-substance Insertion and Fan-like Extension Fibers.

Authors:  Takanori Iriuchishima; Bunsei Goto
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  Changes in the Cross-Sectional Profile of Treated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Within 2 Years After Surgery.

Authors:  Danilo Menghini; Shankar G Kaushal; Sean W Flannery; Kirsten Ecklund; Martha M Murray; Braden C Fleming; Ata M Kiapour; Benedikt Proffen; Nicholas Sant; Gabriela Portilla; Ryan Sanborn; Christina Freiberger; Rachael Henderson; Samuel Barnett; Yi-Meng Yen; Dennis E Kramer; Lyle J Micheli
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-14

5.  Restoring tibiofemoral alignment during ACL reconstruction results in better knee biomechanics.

Authors:  Frantzeska Zampeli; Ioannis Terzidis; João Espregueira-Mendes; Jim-Dimitris Georgoulis; Manfred Bernard; Evangelos Pappas; Anastasios D Georgoulis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Size and Shape of the Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament and the Impact of Sex and Skeletal Growth: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stephanie G Cone; Danielle Howe; Matthew B Fisher
Journal:  JBJS Rev       Date:  2019-06

7.  Comparing Dimensions of Four-Strand Hamstring Tendon Grafts with Native Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligaments.

Authors:  Barış Yılmaz; Güzelali Özdemir; Elif N Keskinöz; Gamze Tümentemur; Kemal Gökkuş; Bahtiyar Demiralp
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: principles of treatment.

Authors:  Nikolaos K Paschos; Stephen M Howell
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13

9.  Differences of Intra-Articular Graft Length between Sandwich-Style Reconstruction and Zhao-Style Non-Remnant-Preserving Double-Bundle Reconstruction of Posterior Cruciate Ligament.

Authors:  Peng Shen; Xiaoxi Li; Caiqi Xu; Song Zhao; Shikui Dong; Yang Zhang; Jinzhong Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Management of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: What's In and What's Out?

Authors:  Benjamin Todd Raines; Emily Naclerio; Seth L Sherman
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.