BACKGROUND: Jet injectors allow needle-free insulin delivery. The study objective was to compare the tolerability and device preference of subcutaneous insulin aspart delivery by jet injector (InsuJet™; European Pharma Group, Schiphol-Rijk, The Netherlands) with pen injection in an open-label, randomized, crossover pilot study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ten participants with type 1 diabetes underwent two meal tolerance tests 1 week apart. Plasma glucose and serum insulin levels were sampled from 10 min preceding to 240 min after insulin aspart administration by InsuJet or FlexPen(®) (Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd., Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia). Insulin dose was calculated using participants' insulin-to-carbohydrate ratios. Immediately after insulin administration, participants drank 500 mL of Ensure(®) (Abbott Australasia Pty. Ltd., Botany, NSW, Australia) (providing 2,240 kJ of energy, 18.6 g of protein, 96 g of carbohydrate, and 3 g of fat). RESULTS: In this small pilot study, the devices were similar in glucose excursion (median [quartile 1, quartile 3], InsuJet vs. FlexPen, 9.4 [4.8, 12.8] vs. 8.1 [5.4, 10.6] mmol/L; P=0.43), in the area under the glucose concentration-time curve for 0-240 min corrected for baseline glucose level (InsuJet vs. FlexPen, 1,230 [623, 2,012] vs. 1,175 [91, 1,774] mmol · min/L; P=0.4), and in insulin absorption over the 240-min period. Devices were similar for participant preference and relative injection pain. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous jet injection of aspart insulin was well tolerated.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Jet injectors allow needle-free insulin delivery. The study objective was to compare the tolerability and device preference of subcutaneous insulin aspart delivery by jet injector (InsuJet™; European Pharma Group, Schiphol-Rijk, The Netherlands) with pen injection in an open-label, randomized, crossover pilot study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ten participants with type 1 diabetes underwent two meal tolerance tests 1 week apart. Plasma glucose and serum insulin levels were sampled from 10 min preceding to 240 min after insulin aspart administration by InsuJet or FlexPen(®) (Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd., Baulkham Hills, NSW, Australia). Insulin dose was calculated using participants' insulin-to-carbohydrate ratios. Immediately after insulin administration, participants drank 500 mL of Ensure(®) (Abbott Australasia Pty. Ltd., Botany, NSW, Australia) (providing 2,240 kJ of energy, 18.6 g of protein, 96 g of carbohydrate, and 3 g of fat). RESULTS: In this small pilot study, the devices were similar in glucose excursion (median [quartile 1, quartile 3], InsuJet vs. FlexPen, 9.4 [4.8, 12.8] vs. 8.1 [5.4, 10.6] mmol/L; P=0.43), in the area under the glucose concentration-time curve for 0-240 min corrected for baseline glucose level (InsuJet vs. FlexPen, 1,230 [623, 2,012] vs. 1,175 [91, 1,774] mmol · min/L; P=0.4), and in insulin absorption over the 240-min period. Devices were similar for participant preference and relative injection pain. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous jet injection of aspart insulin was well tolerated.