Literature DB >> 24285999

Development of polymer-coated glass slides as optical oligonucleotide microarrays.

Atefeh Pourjahed1, Mohammad Rabiee, Mohammadreza Tahriri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The microarray technology is in needed of cost-effective, low background noise and stable substrates for successful hybridization and analysis.
METHODS: In this research, we developed a three-dimentional stable and mechanically reliable microarray substrates by coating of two polymeric layers on standard microscope glass slides. For fabrication of these substrates, a thin film of oxidized agarose was prepared on the Poly-L-Lysine (PLL) coated glass slides. Unmodified oligonucleotide probes were spotted and immobilized on these double layered thin films by adsorption on the porous structure of the agarose film. Some of the aldehyde groups of the activated agarose linked covalently to PLL amine groups; on the other side, they bound to amino groups of adsorbed tail of biomolecules. These linkages were fixed by UV irradiation at 254 nm using a CL-1000 UV. These prepared substrates were compared to only agarose-coated and PLL-coated slides.
RESULTS: Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) results demonstrated that agarose provided three-dimensional surface which had higher loading and bindig capacity for biomolecules than PLL-coated surface which had two-dimensional surface. The nano-indentation tests demonstrated the prepared double coating was more reliable and flexible for mechanical robotic spotting. In addition, the repeated indentation on different substrates showed uniformity of coatings. The stability of novel coating was sufficient for hybridization process. The signal-to-noise ratio in hybridization reactions performed on the agarose-PLL coated substrates increased two fold and four fold compared to agarose and PLL coated substrates, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Finally, the agarose-PLL microarrays had the highest signal (2920) and lowest background signal (205) in hybridization, suggesting that the prepared slides are suitable in analyzing wide concentration range of analytes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agarose; Microarray analysis; PLL; Signal-to-noise ratio

Year:  2013        PMID: 24285999      PMCID: PMC3838769     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avicenna J Med Biotechnol        ISSN: 2008-2835


Introduction

Microarray technology is a potential tool in biomolecular research, which provides high sensitivity and specificity in genomic and proteomic tests (. One of the important challenges in applying this technology is the surface chemistry of substrate. The chemistry should be active and compatible for spotting and immobilization of different probe biomolecules (DNA, proteins, phospholipids and cells) (. Glass, the most widely used microarray substrate, is inexpensive and inert and has low background signal under fluorescence de-tection (. In addition, glass can be easily modified ( to increase binding capacity, hybridization efficiency, spot uniformity and stability of immobilized probes (. Various modification methods activate glass surface for attachment of biomolecules as diagnostic probes. Depending on the properties of the coating, physical or chemical interactions may occur between probe and modified surface of the glass. PLL and amino-silane are physically attached to glass substrate and do not require probe modification (. However, these substrates have low binding capacity and flat surfaces which result in sterical limitations in hybridization of the target to probes (. To solve this problem, we can elevate the probes from flat surface; this can increase binding capacity of the glass (. Polymers such as poly (acrylamide) or aga-rose can act as dendrimetric spacers which can elevate probes from substrate and show high hybridization efficiency (. Agarose is inexpensive, non-toxic ( and commercially available. Coating of oxidized agarose on glass slides can provide aldehyde groups which bind to amino-modified DNA probes (; also DNA probes can attach to aga-rose-coated glass surface using ultraviolet (UV) radiation (. In this work, we prepared PLL, agarose and PLL/agarose coatings on the standard glass slides as oligonucleotide microarray substrates. The probes were immobilized using UV radiation. The prepared slides were compared together and finally the obtained results ascertained the potential of the slides as DNA microarray substrate.

Related works

Dufva et al introduced standard protocol for grafting agarose layer on to unmodified glass microscope slides. AFM characterization of grafted agarose film demonstrated a significant increase in surface roughness. SEM analysis showed the porous structure of agarose. Amino-modified 21 and 25 bp long capture probes were immobilized on activated agarose surface. Agarose-coated slides had the highest signal-to-noise ratio in hybridization. In addition, UV immobilization of DNA probes on to agarose surface on glass slides further increased the signal-to-noise ratio (. In the research of Wei et al a thin film of oxidized agarose was prepared on the surface of ordinary glass slides as antibody/antigen microarray substrate. The aldehyde groups derived from the agarose film were covalently linked with amino groups of antigens. AFM characterization and assay results demonstrated that gel assembly film was a surface of three-dimensional structure. The enzyme immunoassay system on the substrates was successfully developed. These microchips could provide simultaneous analysis for multi-auto-antibodies (. Koch and his co-workers spotted amine-modified oligonucleotides on the surface of activated agarose-coated slides using a manual eight-pin arraying device. The probes easily distinguished different plant pathogens from each other without cross section. Spotted probes on agarose differentiated samples as readily as probes on nylon but with potentially higher spot density and gave much higher signal than probes on silanated slides (. In another study, Dufva et al ascertained that 13- to 17- base oligonucleotide tagged with a poly(T) 10-poly(C) 10 tail, but otherwise unmodified, could be crosslinked by UV irradiation to an agarose film grafted on to unmodified glass. These microarrays were used to diagnose mutations in the human β-globin gene. Sufficiently high discrimination signals were obtained between perfect match and mismatch probes in hybridization. Xu et al developed a new kind of sensitive substrates by coating agarose on silica opal film fabricated on glass substrate. These substrates provided stronger fluorescence signals compared with agarose on unmodified glass and thus improved detection sensitivity (.

Materials and Methods

Materials

Microscope glass slides (25.4 mm×76.2 mm×1 mm) and glass cover slips were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. PLL was purchased from Sigma and Agarose was provided by Roche. Betaine, Sodium Diodecyl Sulfate (SDS), Succinic Anhydride (SA), N-Methyl 2-Pyrrolidone (NMP), Boric acid, Sodium hydroxide (NaOH), Ethanol, Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA), Formamide and Salmon sperm DNA were purchased from Sigma. Saline sodium citrate was provided by Ambion. Sodium periodate was purchased from Fluka. DNA extraction kits were purchased from Tadbir Fan Azma Co. Cy5mono-reactive dye was purchased from GE-Healthcare. Finally, DNA labeling kits were provided by Agilent Technologies Co.

Preparation of polymer film-coated slides

Three different polymeric layers were coated on the standard glass slides: (i) PLL, (ii) Agarose, and (iii) Agarose layer on the PLL coating. After cleaning of microscope slides by a mixed solution of NaOH and ethanol, the slides were rinsed in dH2O. For coating of PLL polymer on cleaned slides, PLL fresh coating solution was prepared by mixing 1:9 ratio of PLL and dH2O, respectively. The slides were covered with the solution for 1 hr on an orbital shaker (50 rpm, Cole Parmer Economic orbital shaker). The slides were transferred in to slide centrifuge (Arrat It® microarray high speed centrifuge) for liquid collection. Then, slides were placed in vaccum oven (43°C, Memmert) for complete drying. Agarose layer was also coated on unmodified glass slides and PLL-coated glass slides according to method described by Dufva et al (.

Preparation of microarrays

DNA probes, which have 35-40 bp long (Table 1) were spotted on the fabricated substrates using Q-array mini system (Genetix, Germany). Printing solution, containing 150 mM of phosphate buffer, pH = 8.5 and 3X SSC with 1.5 M Betaine wasprepared. Dried probes were suspended in the mixture of equal volume of printing buffer and dH2O to obtain final concentration of ∼ 200 ng/µl.
Table 1

Sequences of DNA probes spotted on the fabricated substrates

Probe nameProbe sequence
P1 5’-CCGCTATGACATCGACATGACCAAGTGCATCTACTGC-3’
P2 5’-GGAAATATGGAAGCACTTTGACGCAGACGGAAATGGGTAT-3’
P7 5’-AGACAGATGAGGAGTTTGATGCTCGCTGGGTAACATACTT-3’
P8 5’-AACAAGAGAATAGTAGGCTGCATCTGTGAAGAGGACAATACCA-3’
P26 5’-GCTGTACCGAACGGATCTTGCTCTTATTCTCTGTGCTG-3’
Sequences of DNA probes spotted on the fabricated substrates Substrates were printed at 40-50% relative humidity, and then dried in the air for 10 min. The probes were spotted in quadruplicate on the substrates. The DNA probes were immobilized on the slides by UV radiation at 254 nm using a CL-1000 UV crosslinker (UVP Inc.) for 3 min. Then, arrays were immersed in 1% Sodium Diodecylsulphate (SDS) for 30 s. Finally, the slides were dried using compressed nitrogen gas.

Morphological characterization of the coated slides

The micro-scale micrographs of the spotted and unspotted glass slides were obtained using AIS2100 Scanning Electron Microscopy (Seron Technology Inc., Korea). A Hysitron Inc. (USA) Triboscope® Nanomechanical test instrument with 2D transducer, complete soft-ware and Berkovich diamond indenter were used to measure reduced elastic modulus (Er) and hardness (H) of the coated and uncoated glass slides. Five measurements were performed in the peripheral and central parts of the slides. The AFM (Atomic Force Microscope) part and a Nanoscope E (Digital Instruments, USA) were used to obtain images of the surface. The AFM images were analyzed using Nanoscope® software version III 5.12r2. Mean roughness (Ra), root-mean square roughness (Rms), maximum height (Rmax) and 3D surface area (Rarea) were calculated using this software.

Target preparation and labeling

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using TadbirFan Azma DNA extraction kit (Iran). For labeling genomic DNA, 2 µg of DNA was added to dH2O to bring total volume to 21 µl. Then, 20 µl of 2.5X random primer/reaction buffer was added. The mixture was boiled for 5 min, and then placed on ice. 5 µl of 10X dNTP was added on ice. Then, 3 µl of cy5-dCTP dye and 1 µl of Klenow fragment were added. The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 2 hr. The reaction was stopped by adding 5 µl of 0.5 M EDTA at pH = 8.0.

Hybridization

Hybridization solution was prepared according to Table 2. Pre-hybridization of the slides was done to eliminate non-specific binding of target to the slides. The slides were immersed in hybridization solution and incubated at 42°C for 1 hr in a water bath. Then, the pre-hybridized slides were washed in dH2O and dried using compressed nitrogen gas.
Table 2

Recipe for preparing 100 ml of 1X hybridization solution

IngredientAmountrequiredFinal concentration
20X SSC 25 ml 5X SSC
SDS 0.1 g 0.1% (w/v)
BSA 1.0 g 1.0% (w/v)
Formamide 50 ml 50% (v/v)
Salmon sperm DNA 10 mg 0.01% (w/v)
Deionized water Fill to 100 ml
Recipe for preparing 100 ml of 1X hybridization solution Labeled DNA target was diluted in hybridization solution to 10 nM final concentration. The microarrays were hybridized with appropriate amount of target under cover slips in incubator at 42°C 5 hr until spots saturated. Then, the slides were immersed in the solution 2X SSC and 0.1% SDS and washed in 1X SSC for 1 min, in 0.2X SSC for 1 min and 0.05X SSC for 1-2 s and finally rinsed in dH2O and dried using compressed nitrogen gas.

Microarray quantification

The hybridized microarrays were scanned using Scan Array GX Microarray Scanner (Perkin Elmer). Spots were quantified from the images generated from Scan Array GX Microarray software (Perkin Elmer) using Scan Analyze software version 2.5. For calculating signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of spots, the following formula was employed: where SM was mean signal of four spots which replicated each probe when hybridized to cy5 labeled target and BM was mean background signal.

Results

The principle for linking of different coatings with biomolecules

PLL used to coat glass slides for preparing microarrays can attach to glass slides more strongly than agarose layer. But PLL-coated surfaces have low binding capacity for biomolecules. Activated agarose provided a thin layer on the glass with active aldehyde groups which can bind to amino groups on various biomolecules, such as DNA, proteins, peptides and phospholipids. In addition to providing active groups on the surface, agarose could perform a physical function; it provided a uniform three-dimensional solid support for dynamic attaching of biomolecules. Activated agarose thin film on the PLL-coated glass slides resulted in chemical binding between two polymer layers; therefore, agarose could attach to PLL-coated slides more strongly than unmodified slides. Therefore, higher stability in hybridization reactions and higher signal-to-noise ratio were provided.

Surface analysis of polymer film-coated slides

The surface profiles of the coated and uncoated glasses characterized by AFM showed that agarose provided three-dimensional thin film on the unmodified and PLL-coated glass slides (Figures 1A and 2A). The mean roughness (Ra), root-mean square roughness (Rms), maximum height (Rmax) and 3D surface area (Rarea) for agarose-PLL coated, agarose coated and PLL-coated glass were reported in Table 3. The section analysis of agarose-PLL coated, agarose coated and PLL-coated slides revealed that their vertical distance were 35.520 and 33.504 nm, respectively (Figures 1C, 2C and 3C), while vertical distance of PLL-coated surface was 0.817 nm. The distance demonstrated the thickness of thin polymeric films on glass surface.
Figure 1

AFM image of agarose-PLL coating: A) threedimensional image: B) roughness analysis of surface (twodimensional image) and C) section analysis of agarose-PLL coating

Figure 2

AFM image of agarose layer on unmodified glass: A) three-dimensional image: B) roughness analysis of surface (two-dimensional image) and C) section analysis of agarose layer

Table 3

Surface analysis data of the samples

SampleRa (nm)Rms (nm)Rmax (nm)Rarea (μm)2
Agarose on PLLcoated slide 7.0869.02562.43325.059
Agarose on glass slide 7.3349.15663.60125.063
PLL coated slide 0.8691.57220.48825.005
Figure 3

AFM image of PLL coating: A) three-dimensional image; B) roughness analysis of surface (two-dimensional image) and C) section analysis of PLL layer

AFM image of agarose-PLL coating: A) threedimensional image: B) roughness analysis of surface (twodimensional image) and C) section analysis of agarose-PLL coating AFM image of agarose layer on unmodified glass: A) three-dimensional image: B) roughness analysis of surface (two-dimensional image) and C) section analysis of agarose layer AFM image of PLL coating: A) three-dimensional image; B) roughness analysis of surface (two-dimensional image) and C) section analysis of PLL layer Surface analysis data of the samples The mean reduced elastic modulus (Er) and mean hardness (H) were calculated from five indentations performed in peripheral and central parts of surface and were reported in Table 4 for agarose on PLL-coated slides, agarose on unmodified glass and unmodified glass. The nano-indentation measurements on the surfaces ascertained the impressibility and softness of prepared substrate surface which was essential for spotter pins’ safety. Although, agarose coatings were applied manually to the surface, five different measurements showed that agarose layers were relatively uniform. The difference between mechanical properties of agarose-PLL in comparison with PLL two-dimensional layers was related to three-dimensional agarose structure on the surface. PLL is a polymer which can reduce hardness of the coated surface; therefore, the difference between the mechanical properties of agarose-PLL and agarose coatings and also the difference between PLL-coated and unmodified glass surfaces were related to coating by PLL polymeric layer.
Table 4

Mean reduced elastic modulus and mean hardness of dried samples

SampleEr (GPa)H (GPa)
Agarose-PLL coated slide 4.6130.142
Agarose coated slide 5.1090.16
PLL coated slide 65.5454.231
Glass slide 72.6415.454
Mean reduced elastic modulus and mean hardness of dried samples

Spot uniformity and morphological analysis of prepared microarrays

SEM analysis of the agarose on the glass slides showed a porous film (Figure 4). In addition, this micrograph demonstrated that the orientation of agarose film was parallel to glass surface.
Figure 4

SEM image of agarose layer on the surface of the slides

SEM image of agarose layer on the surface of the slides The SEM micrograph of the prepared microarrays on three different coated substrates showed spots written on the agarose layers were more regular than spots on the PLL-coated slides in shape and size (Figures 5A, B and C). Some spots on the PLL-coated substrate had an inappropriate quality and were ununiformed in diameter. It is worth mentioning that spots on the agarose had better quality (Figures 6A, B and C). The spot diameter was between 200-250 µm.
Figure 5

SEM image of the spots written on the A) PLL coated glass slide, the spots were irregular and non-uniform in shape and size; B) agarose coated glass slide, the spots were more regular and uniform in shape and size compared with the spots on PLL coating; C) agarose-PLL coated glass slide, the most uniform and regular spots were formed on agarose-PLL coated slide 4. SEM image of agarose layer on the surface of the slides

Figure 6

The shape of one spot on the A) PLL coated glass slide, the shape of spot on PLL coated glass was more irregular and had defects in the center of the spot; B) agarosecoated glass slide, the shape of this slide was more desirable than spots on PLL coated glass; C) agarose-PLL coated glass slide. The best round spot was obtained on agarose-PLL coated glass slide

SEM image of the spots written on the A) PLL coated glass slide, the spots were irregular and non-uniform in shape and size; B) agarose coated glass slide, the spots were more regular and uniform in shape and size compared with the spots on PLL coating; C) agarose-PLL coated glass slide, the most uniform and regular spots were formed on agarose-PLL coated slide 4. SEM image of agarose layer on the surface of the slides The shape of one spot on the A) PLL coated glass slide, the shape of spot on PLL coated glass was more irregular and had defects in the center of the spot; B) agarosecoated glass slide, the shape of this slide was more desirable than spots on PLL coated glass; C) agarose-PLL coated glass slide. The best round spot was obtained on agarose-PLL coated glass slide

Stability of polymer films in hybridization process

The activated agarose layer grafted to PLL-coated on the glass surface could sustain incubation at 37°C for 6.5 hr and at 50°C for 5 hr. Also, we examined the stability of aga-rose layer on the unmodified glass slides; it could sustain incubation at 37°C for 3 hr and at 50°C for 1 hr without rehydration and detaching from the slides. These slides can be stable in hybridization of biomolecules, such as proteins, peptides and oligonucleotides to microarrays.

Comparison of different microarray substrates in hybridization reactions

The slides coated using activated agarose and agarose-PLL film showed significant increase in signal and signal-to-noise ratio in comparison with slides coated using PLL alone (Figures 7A and C). Also, background signal from substrate was higher in PLL-coated slides than two slides coated using agarose. The agarose layer on PLL-coated substrate showed the best hybridization signal (Figure 7B). The agarose-PLL coated substrates had a 4-fold and 2-fold increase in SNR compared with PLL-coated slides and agarose-coated slides, respectively. These results demonstrated that agarose-PLL coated slides are suitable for analyzing wide concentration range analytes.
Figure 7

Three different microarray substrates in hybridization reactions. PLL-coated, agarose coated and PLL-agarose coated glass slides were compared in terms of mean signal, mean background signal and signal-to-noise ratio. The highest signal and SNR were obtained for agarose-PLL coated slides. These slides also emitted the lowest background signal for each five probes after hybridization

Three different microarray substrates in hybridization reactions. PLL-coated, agarose coated and PLL-agarose coated glass slides were compared in terms of mean signal, mean background signal and signal-to-noise ratio. The highest signal and SNR were obtained for agarose-PLL coated slides. These slides also emitted the lowest background signal for each five probes after hybridization

Discussion

The physical methods for modification of glass substrates to immobilize biomolecules provide surfaces with low binding capacity which results in non-uniform absorption. Therefore, the probe immobilization isn't efficient to hybridize to target molecules and insufficient signal-to-noise ratio may be obtained. Using chemical immobilization, based on covalent crosslinking of surface active groups and chemical active groups on probe structure, uniform and efficient immobilization of biomolecules on the solid substrate can be provided. Agagrose gel is considered as a non-toxic and inexpensive polysaccharide which has matrix structure and specific physical and chemical properties, such as high gel strength at low concentrations, broad range of physical, chemical and thermal stability and low degree of chemical complexity. Therefore, it has been widely used in biotechnology and life sciences, such as immobilization substrate in electrophoresis (. Previous studies ascertained active aldehyde groups in agarose could be linked to amino groups in biomolecules and after UV crosslinking, the covalent binds could be formed. On the other hand, agarose could attach to surface of the glass more strongly if amine groups were provided on the surface. In this research, we used a PLL coating on the glass surface which could be linked to some of the aldehyde groups in oxidized agarose. PLL is a material utilized for glass modification to prepare microarrays. This polymer can attach to glass surface strongly. So, it has low interference in background signal; also it is a polymer and can provide high density of amine groups for binding more uniformly to agarose. Because of the gel structure of aga-rose, thin film biomolecules could infiltrate into its microporous structure so binding capacity of surface would be increased. The surface analysis of the prepared slides demonstrated that agarose gel was a three-dimensional matrix which resulted in an increase in surface roughness and a decrease in hardness and elastic modulus compared with PLL coated slides and unmodified glass. The hardness and modulus of agarose-PLL layer were lower than agarose coating on the glass and the coating of PLL polymer on the glass substrate under the agarose thin film was shown. In addition, these results ascertained impressibility and softness of prepared substrates that were essential for the spotter pins’ safety during contact with the surface in mechanical spotting. The agarose-PLL layer, which had the lowest hardness, had low risk of pin breakage during contact with pins’ head. The vertical distances for agarose-PLL and agarose surface were 35.520 and 33.540 nm, respectively. This parameter could estimate the thin film layer on the surface. The SEM images of the spots on three different substrates showed that spots on two types of agarose layers (agarose on PLL and agarose) were more regular in shape and size in comparison with the spots on PLL coated surface. This observation could be related to desirable hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity of agarose surface compared with PLL (. Long-term stability of agarose layer grafted to PLL was significantly increased compared with agarose on the surface of the other amino-modified glass ( and agarose on the ordinary glass slides. The agarose on PLL-coated glass sustained itself for 6.5 hr at 37°C and for 5 hr at 50°C, whereas agarose film on unmodified glass and agarose layer on the other modified glass were stable for 1 and 4 hr ( at 50°C, respectively. This was the result of binding of some of the active aldehyde groups of agarose to amine groups of PLL on the surface and stronger attaching of agarose to surface of the glass substrate. Effective binding of probes to the surface of agarose-PLL coated and agarose coated substrates reduced noise in hybridization signal compared with PLL coated substrates. Also, the stronger attachment of agarose to PLL coated glass than the unmodified glass increased signal-to-noise ratio (56.435 compared with 21.235, respectively) and decreased background signal (205 compared with 381, respectively) which resulted in sufficient hybridization analysis on the agarose-PLL coated glass substrates. In previous related studies, researchers immobilized amino-modified probes on to aga-rose-coated substrates (. Dufva et al immobilized 20-25 bp long modified probes by UV irradiation which resulted in significant increase in hybridization signal (. In another study, this group immobilized poly(C) 10-poly (T) 10 tagged 17-base oligonucleotide, but unmodified probes, using UV light on to agarose surface and they obtained sufficient discrimination signals (. In our research, the unmodified longer probes (35-40 bp) were immobilized on agarose surface using UV irradiation, therefore, despite the connection between few bases in probe end and the gel surface, the probes had enough number of nucleotide to retain their specificity for hybridization to targets as ascertained by sufficient signal intensity. In addition, utilization of PLL coating under agarose layer on glass surface resulted in higher stability and lower background signal in hybridization compared with silane coating under agarose layer (. This was the reason for low interference of PLL in fluorescence detection.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we can say that substrates coated with polymeric thin films provide sufficient mechanical properties for robotic spotting, three-dimensional structure for binding unmodified oligonucleotide, low background noise, and high signal intensity in hybridization reactions. Therefore, we fabricated inexpensive and simple to use microarray substrates, capable of biomolecule detection in high throughput and simultaneous assays.
  19 in total

1.  High-quality substrate for fluorescence enhancement using agarose-coated silica opal film.

Authors:  Ming Xu; Juan Li; Liguo Sun; Yuanjin Zhao; Zhuoying Xie; Linli Lv; Xiangwei Zhao; Pengfeng Xiao; Jing Hu; Mei Lv; Zhongze Gu
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2010-08

Review 2.  Recent advances in peptide probe-based biosensors for detection of infectious agents.

Authors:  Jason E Dover; Grace M Hwang; Elaine H Mullen; Barton C Prorok; Sang-Jin Suh
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  The application of 3D micropatterning of agarose substrate for cell culture and in situ comet assays.

Authors:  Emilie Mercey; Patricia Obeïd; Denise Glaise; Maria-Luisa Calvo-Muñoz; Christiane Guguen-Guillouzo; Brigitte Fouqué
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Three-dimensional arrayed amino aerogel biochips for molecular recognition of antigens.

Authors:  Yen K Li; Yun-Chu Chen; Kai-Jen Jiang; Jui-chuang Wu; Yui W Chen-Yang
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Macroporous methacrylate-based monoliths as platforms for DNA microarrays.

Authors:  Ekaterina S Sinitsyna; Johanna G Walter; Evgenia G Vlakh; Frank Stahl; Cornelia Kasper; Tatiana B Tennikova
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 6.057

6.  Covalent attachment of hybridizable oligonucleotides to glass supports.

Authors:  B Joos; H Kuster; R Cone
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1997-04-05       Impact factor: 3.365

7.  Detection of mutations using microarrays of poly(C)10-poly(T)10 modified DNA probes immobilized on agarose films.

Authors:  Martin Dufva; Jesper Petersen; Michael Stoltenborg; Henrik Birgens; Claus B V Christensen
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 3.365

8.  Characterization of an inexpensive, nontoxic, and highly sensitive microarray substrate.

Authors:  Martin Dufva; Sarunas Petronis; Louise Bjerremann Jensen; Claudia Krag; Claus B V Christensen
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.993

9.  Fabrication of DNA microarrays on nanoengineered polymeric ultrathin film prepared by self-assembly of polyelectrolyte multilayers.

Authors:  Xichun Zhou; Liyou Wu; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 3.882

10.  A novel three-dimensional aerogel biochip for molecular recognition of nucleotide acids.

Authors:  Yen Kuang Li; Den-Kai Yang; Yun-Chu Chen; Hung-Ju Su; Jui-Chuang Wu; Yui Whei Chen-Yang
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.