Literature DB >> 24285840

Increased rate of phenocopies in all age groups in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation kindred, but increased prospective breast cancer risk is confined to BRCA2 mutation carriers.

D Gareth R Evans1, Sarah L Ingham, Iain Buchan, Emma R Woodward, Helen Byers, Anthony Howell, Eamonn R Maher, William G Newman, Fiona Lalloo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To establish, if among unaffected noncarrier relatives in a family with an established BRCA1/2 mutation, there is an increased risk of breast cancer.
METHODS: We identified 49 women with breast cancer who were first-degree relatives of a pathogenic mutation carrier among 807 BRCA1/2 families but who tested negative for the specific mutation. A prospective analysis of breast cancer from date of family ascertainment was performed for first-degree relatives of proven BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and compared with population-expected incidence rates.
RESULTS: Women who prospectively test negative for BRCA1/2 mutations showed excess risk of breast cancer to be confined to BRCA2 noncarriers with an observed:expected (O/E) ratio of 4.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.50-7.67; P < 0.0001; O/E in BRCA1 noncarriers, 1.77]; this dropped to 2.01 for BRCA2 [relative risk (RR), 1.99; 95% CI, 0.54-5.10] from date of predictive test. Genotyping of 18 breast cancer susceptibility single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) defined an RR of 1.31 for BRCA2 breast cancer phenocopies with a breast cancer diagnosis at age less than 60 years.
CONCLUSION: Noncarriers remain at risk in the prospective follow-up of women who tested negative for BRCA1/2. Women testing negative in BRCA2 families may have increased risk of breast cancer compared with population levels, particularly with strong breast cancer history in close relatives. Any increased risk in BRCA1 families is likely to be insufficient to recommend additional interventions. IMPACT: Our work can help with counseling women from BRCA1/2 families who have tested negative, and could impact on how individual breast cancer risk is related back to these women. ©2013 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24285840     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0316-T

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  7 in total

1.  Antimüllerian hormone levels are lower in BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Lauren Johnson; Mary D Sammel; Susan Domchek; Allison Schanne; Maureen Prewitt; Clarisa Gracia
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  No evidence of increased breast cancer risk for proven noncarriers from BRCA1 and BRCA2 families.

Authors:  Henriette Roed Nielsen; Janne Petersen; Lotte Krogh; Mef Nilbert; Anne-Bine Skytte
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Analysis of chromosomal radiosensitivity of healthy BRCA2 mutation carriers and non-carriers in BRCA families with the G2 micronucleus assay.

Authors:  Annelot Baert; Julie Depuydt; Tom Van Maerken; Bruce Poppe; Fransiska Malfait; Tim Van Damme; Sylvia De Nobele; Gianpaolo Perletti; Kim De Leeneer; Kathleen B M Claes; Anne Vral
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Revertant mosaicism for family mutations is not observed in BRCA1/2 phenocopies.

Authors:  Jacopo Azzollini; Chiara Pesenti; Luca Ferrari; Laura Fontana; Mariarosaria Calvello; Bernard Peissel; Giorgio Portera; Silvia Tabano; Maria Luisa Carcangiu; Paola Riva; Monica Miozzo; Siranoush Manoukian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Risks of breast or ovarian cancer in BRCA1 or BRCA2 predictive test negatives: findings from the EMBRACE study.

Authors:  Fabio Girardi; Daniel R Barnes; Daniel Barrowdale; Debra Frost; Angela F Brady; Claire Miller; Alex Henderson; Alan Donaldson; Alex Murray; Carole Brewer; Caroline Pottinger; D Gareth Evans; Diana Eccles; Fiona Lalloo; Helen Gregory; Jackie Cook; Jacqueline Eason; Julian Adlard; Julian Barwell; Kai Ren Ong; Lisa Walker; Louise Izatt; Lucy E Side; M John Kennedy; Marc Tischkowitz; Mark T Rogers; Mary E Porteous; Patrick J Morrison; Ros Eeles; Rosemarie Davidson; Katie Snape; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Genetic variants of prospectively demonstrated phenocopies in BRCA1/2 kindreds.

Authors:  Mev Dominguez-Valentin; D Gareth R Evans; Sigve Nakken; Hélène Tubeuf; Daniel Vodak; Per Olaf Ekstrøm; Anke M Nissen; Monika Morak; Elke Holinski-Feder; Alexandra Martins; Pål Møller; Eivind Hovig
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 2.857

Review 7.  Look Alike, Sound Alike: Phenocopies in Steroid-Resistant Nephrotic Syndrome.

Authors:  Francesca Becherucci; Samuela Landini; Luigi Cirillo; Benedetta Mazzinghi; Paola Romagnani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.