Literature DB >> 24285758

Performance of the adverse drug event trigger tool and the global trigger tool for identifying adverse drug events: experience in a Belgian hospital.

Lise Carnevali1, Bruno Krug, Fabienne Amant, Dominique Van Pee, Véronique Gérard, Xavier de Béthune, Anne Spinewine.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medication-related harm can be detected using the adverse drug event (ADE) trigger tool and the medication module of the Global Trigger Tool (GTT) developed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). In recent years, there has been some controversy on the performance of this method. In addition, there are limited data on the performance of the medication module of the GTT as compared with the ADE trigger tool.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the ADE trigger tool and of the medication module of the GTT for identifying ADEs.
METHODS: The methodology of the IHI was used. A random sample of 20 adult admissions per month was selected over a 12-month period in a teaching hospital in Belgium. The ADE trigger tool was adapted to the Belgian setting and included 20 triggers. The positive predictive value (PPV) of each trigger was calculated, as well as the proportion of ADEs that would have been identified with the medication module of the GTT as compared with the ADE trigger tool.
RESULTS: A total of 200 triggers and 62 ADEs were found, representing 26 ADEs/100 admissions. Nineteen ADEs (31%) were found spontaneously without the presence of a trigger. Three triggers never occurred. The PPVs of other triggers varied from 0 to 0.67, with half of them having PPVs less than 0.20. If we had used the medication triggers included in the GTT (n = 11), we would have identified 77% of total ADEs and 67% of preventable ADEs.
CONCLUSIONS: Applying the trigger tool method proposed by the IHI to a Belgian hospital led to the identification of one ADE out of 4 admissions. To increase performance, refining the list of triggers in the ADE trigger tool and in the medication module of the GTT would be needed. Recording nontriggered events should be encouraged.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Belgium; adverse drug reactions reporting systems; medication errors; safety management; trigger tool

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24285758     DOI: 10.1177/1060028013500939

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  20 in total

1.  Development of a trigger tool for the detection of adverse drug events in Chinese geriatric inpatients using the Delphi method.

Authors:  Qiaozhi Hu; Zhou Qin; Mei Zhan; Bin Wu; Zhaoyan Chen; Ting Xu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2019-06-28

2.  Adverse drug events in patients with advanced chronic conditions who have a prognosis of limited life expectancy at hospital admission.

Authors:  Daniel Sevilla-Sanchez; Núria Molist-Brunet; Jordi Amblàs-Novellas; Pere Roura-Poch; Joan Espaulella-Panicot; Carles Codina-Jané
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Development of a 'ready-to-use' tool that includes preventability, for the assessment of adverse drug events in oncology.

Authors:  Guillaume Hébert; Florence Netzer; Sylvain Landry Kouakou; François Lemare; Etienne Minvielle
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2018-02-14

4.  Evaluation of accuracy of IHI Trigger Tool in identifying adverse drug events: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Maria das Dores Graciano Silva; Maria Auxiliadora Parreiras Martins; Luciana de Gouvêa Viana; Luiz Guilherme Passaglia; Renata Rezende de Menezes; João Antonio de Queiroz Oliveira; Jose Luiz Padilha da Silva; Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-08       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Development of a standardized chart review method to identify drug-related hospital admissions in older people.

Authors:  Stefanie Thevelin; Anne Spinewine; Jean-Baptiste Beuscart; Benoit Boland; Sophie Marien; Fanny Vaillant; Ingeborg Wilting; Ariel Vondeling; Carmen Floriani; Claudio Schneider; Jacques Donzé; Nicolas Rodondi; Shane Cullinan; Denis O'Mahony; Olivia Dalleur
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  The Emergency Department Trigger Tool: A Novel Approach to Screening for Quality and Safety Events.

Authors:  Richard T Griffey; Ryan M Schneider; Alexandre A Todorov
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 7.  Validation of triggers and development of a pediatric trigger tool to identify adverse events.

Authors:  Maria Unbeck; Synnöve Lindemalm; Per Nydert; Britt-Marie Ygge; Urban Nylén; Carina Berglund; Karin Pukk Härenstam
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Leveraging Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reports for the Automated Monitoring of Electronic Health Records in a Pediatric Hospital.

Authors:  Huaxiu Tang; Imre Solti; Eric Kirkendall; Haijun Zhai; Todd Lingren; Jaroslaw Meller; Yizhao Ni
Journal:  Biomed Inform Insights       Date:  2017-06-08

9.  Multicenter Test of an Emergency Department Trigger Tool for Detecting Adverse Events.

Authors:  Richard T Griffey; Ryan M Schneider; Brian R Sharp; Jeff Pothof; Marie C Vrablik; Nic Granzella; Alexandre A Todorov; Lee Adler
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Trigger Tools for Adverse Event Detection in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Richard T Griffey; Ryan M Schneider; Brian Sharp
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 2.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.