Literature DB >> 24285034

Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review?

Thomas Wesley Allen1.   

Abstract

Peer review is essential to the quality of scientific publications. As the volume of submissions to these journals increases, the need for an expanding cadre of trained reviewers also increases. Many reviewers do not receive formal training on conducting a peer review or education on the peer review process, however. The author presents an overview of the peer review process and provides guidance for conducting high-quality reviews of manuscripts submitted to The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association and other scientific journals.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24285034     DOI: 10.7556/jaoa.2013.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc        ISSN: 0098-6151


  4 in total

1.  Editors' Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development.

Authors:  Kristin K Janke; Andrew S Bzowyckyj; Andrew P Traynor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.

Authors:  Susan A Elmore
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 1.902

3.  Being critical and constructive: a guide to peer reviewing for librarians.

Authors:  Katherine G Akers
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2017-01

4.  How to review a paper for Archives of Plastic Surgery, communicate as a reviewer, and handle disagreements with authors.

Authors:  Yong-Ha Kim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.