Literature DB >> 24282964

Estimating the concentration of indoor particles of outdoor origin: a review.

E Diapouli1, A Chaloulakou, P Koutrakis.   

Abstract

Recent toxicological results highlight the importance of separating exposure to indoor- and outdoor-generated particles, due to their different physicochemical and toxicological properties. In this framework, a number of studies have attempted to estimate the relative contribution of particles of indoor and outdoor origins to indoor concentrations, using either statistical analysis of indoor and outdoor concentration time-series or mass balance equations. The aim of this work is to review and compare the methodologies developed in order to determine the ambient particle infiltration factor (F(INF)) (i.e., the fraction of ambient particles that enter indoors and remains suspended). The different approaches are grouped into four categories according to their methodological principles: (1) steady-state assumption using the steady-state form of the mass balance equation; (2) dynamic solution of the mass balance equation using complex statistical techniques; (3) experimental studies using conditions that simplify model calculations (e.g., decreasing the number of unknowns); and (4) infiltration surrogates using a particulate matter (PM) constituent with no indoor sources to act as surrogate of indoor PM of outdoor origin. Examination of the various methodologies and results reveals that estimating infiltration parameters is still challenging. The main difficulty lies in the separate calculation of penetration efficiency (P) and deposition rate (k). The values for these two parameters that are reported in the literature vary significantly. Deposition rate presents the widest range of values, both between studies and size fractions. Penetration efficiency seems to be more accurately calculated through the application of dynamic models. Overall, estimates of the infiltration factor generated using dynamic models and infiltration surrogates show good agreement. This is a strong argument in favor of the latter methodology, which is simple and easy to apply when chemical speciation data are available.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24282964     DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2013.791649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc        ISSN: 1096-2247            Impact factor:   2.235


  14 in total

1.  Wildfire smoke impacts on indoor air quality assessed using crowdsourced data in California.

Authors:  Yutong Liang; Deep Sengupta; Mark J Campmier; David M Lunderberg; Joshua S Apte; Allen H Goldstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Finding the infectious dose for COVID-19 by applying an airborne-transmission model to superspreader events.

Authors:  Mara Prentiss; Arthur Chu; Karl K Berggren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Estimating climate change-related impacts on outdoor air pollution infiltration.

Authors:  Donghai Liang; Wan-Chen Lee; Jiawen Liao; Joy Lawrence; Jack M Wolfson; Stefanie T Ebelt; Choong-Min Kang; Petros Koutrakis; Jeremy A Sarnat
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Continuous measurement of reactive oxygen species inside and outside of a residential house during summer.

Authors:  Azin Eftekhari; Claire F Fortenberry; Brent J Williams; Michael J Walker; Audrey Dang; Annalise Pfaff; Nuran Ercal; Glenn C Morrison
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 6.554

5.  Field measurements of PM2.5 infiltration factor and portable air cleaner effectiveness during wildfire episodes in US residences.

Authors:  Jianbang Xiang; Ching-Hsuan Huang; Jeff Shirai; Yisi Liu; Nancy Carmona; Christopher Zuidema; Elena Austin; Timothy Gould; Timothy Larson; Edmund Seto
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 10.753

6.  Modeling residential indoor concentrations of PM2.5 , NO2 , NOx , and secondhand smoke in the Subpopulations and Intermediate Outcome Measures in COPD (SPIROMICS) Air study.

Authors:  Marina Zusman; Amanda J Gassett; Kipruto Kirwa; R Graham Barr; Christopher B Cooper; MeiLan K Han; Richard E Kanner; Kirsten Koehler; Victor E Ortega; Robert Paine Rd; Laura Paulin; Cheryl Pirozzi; Ana Rule; Nadia N Hansel; Joel D Kaufman
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 6.554

Review 7.  Estimating mortality derived from indoor exposure to particles of outdoor origin.

Authors:  Wenjing Ji; Bin Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Characterizing the Indoor-Outdoor Relationship of Fine Particulate Matter in Non-Heating Season for Urban Residences in Beijing.

Authors:  Lihui Huang; Zhongnan Pu; Mu Li; Jan Sundell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Development of a modeling approach to estimate indoor-to-outdoor sulfur ratios and predict indoor PM2.5 and black carbon concentrations for Eastern Massachusetts households.

Authors:  Chia Hsi Tang; Eric Garshick; Stephanie Grady; Brent Coull; Joel Schwartz; Petros Koutrakis
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 5.563

10.  Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 by inhalation of respiratory aerosol in the Skagit Valley Chorale superspreading event.

Authors:  Shelly L Miller; William W Nazaroff; Jose L Jimenez; Atze Boerstra; Giorgio Buonanno; Stephanie J Dancer; Jarek Kurnitski; Linsey C Marr; Lidia Morawska; Catherine Noakes
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 6.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.