Literature DB >> 24282795

Dyslipidemia after kidney transplantation and correlation with cyclosporine level.

Mahboobeh-Sadat Hosseini1, Zohreh Rostami, Behzad Einollahi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dyslipidemia after kidney transplantation is a frequent finding and is multifactorial. Immunosuppressive agents such as cyclosporine (CsA) can cause hypercholesterolemia.
OBJECTIVES: As there were few reports with conflicting evidence on whether CsA related dyslipidemia is dose related and that CsA monitoring assays (trough level, C0, or two hour post dose level, C2) is a better predictor for dyslipidemia development; hence, the current study, in a large sample size, was designed to answer these questions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the current retrospective cross sectional study, 1391 kidney transplant recipients were enrolled. All patients received CsA plus mycophenolatemofetile or azathioprine and prednisolone. Serum creatinine, CsA blood levels and lipid profile were measured after 12-14 h fasting. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson`s test and logistic regression were used for data analyses.
RESULTS: Mean age of 1391studied population was 38.7 ± 15 years old. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were observed in 58.9% and 86.6%, respectively and they were more significantly detected in cadaveric kidney transplantation. Dyslipidemia had weak correlation with age of recipient, serum creatinine, C0 and C2 levels of CsA. At logistic regression, serum creatinine was the only risk factor for hypercholesterolemia development after kidney transplantation (OR = 1.6, CI 95%: 1.4 -1.8).
CONCLUSIONS: Dyslipidemia is a common finding after kidney transplantation and has no correlation with CsA level. According to conflicting data on the precise effect of different factors in inducing dyslipidemia, prospective large sample size studies should consider better control of dyslipidemia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cyclosporine; Dyslipidemias; Kidney Transplantation

Year:  2013        PMID: 24282795      PMCID: PMC3830911          DOI: 10.5812/numonthly.11890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrourol Mon        ISSN: 2251-7006


1. Background

Lipid abnormalities are frequent findings among renal transplantation recipients, although renal function is often normal or near normal (1). Besides other contributing factors, post-transplant dyslipidemia may be related to immunosuppressive treatment (2, 3). Cyclosporine (CsA) can directly cause post-transplant hypercholesterolemia, an effect that is independent of concurrent (4). Also the impact of CsA upon lipid levels appears to be dose dependent. The trough blood (C0) levels of the agents correlate with elevations in total and LDL cholesterol concentrations and with reduction in HDL cholesterol levels corticosteroid use (3). Due to high incidence of atherosclerosis events in the renal transplantation population, it should be considered a coronary heart disease equivalent risk and ability to modify dyslipidemia render lipid modification which is a potentially important intervention for improving outcome after kidney transplantation (5-9).

2. Objectives

There are conflicting evidence and few reports on whether CsA-related side effects are dose dependent phenomenon and if C0 level is a better predictor than two hour post dose (C2) level of CsA for dyslipidemia evolution (5, 7-10). To answer these questions, the current study evaluated correlation among dyslipidemia, C0 and C2 levels of CsA in a large sample.

3. Patients and Methods

3.1. Study Population

In the current retrospective, cross-sectional study, 1391 kidney transplant recipients in several Kidney Transplant Centers, Tehran, Iran from April 2008 to January 2011 were enrolled. During this period, all patients were referred to a single laboratory for measurement of all biochemical parameters tests such as lipid profile. The patients with any infections, rejections, hypothyroid state or patients who used beta belockers, thiazids or OCPs were excluded. The current study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences.

3.2. Immunosuppression

All patients received CsA (targeting a trough level of 200 to 300 ng/mL for the first 3 months, 100 to 250 ng/mL for 4 to 12 months and 100 to 150 ng/mL thereafter; while using target of 2 hour post dose level was 800 to 1000 ng/mL for the first 3 months and 400 to 600 ng/mL for subsequent months) plus mycophenolatemofetil (1–2 g per day) or azathioprine (1–2 mg/kg per day) and prednisolone (initially 1 mg/kg daily with tapering to 5-10 mg per day during 3 to 6 months).

3.3. Clinical and Biochemical Data Collection

The clinical and biochemical data recorded for all patients were sex of recipients and donors, donor source (living or cadaveric), serum creatinine (Cr) concentration, CsA levels, and lipid profile (triglyceride (TG), cholesterol (Chol), HDL- cholesterol and LDL- cholesterol). All the mentioned biochemical variables were measured < 3 months, 4-12 months and > 1 year after kidney transplantations. Blood samples were obtained in the morning after 12-14 hours fasting.

3.4. Definitions

According to NCEP ATP III, (11) hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were considered if serum cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were more than 240 mg/dL and 150 mg/dL respectively for at least two consecutive tests performed. LDL- cholesterol and HDL- cholesterol levels more than 130 and less than 40 mg/d were considered as high LDL and low HDL, respectively.

3.5. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were expressed mean ± SD. Since none of the variables had normal distribution, non-parametric tests (Mann-Whitney and Kruskal Wallis) were used to determine differences between the two and several groups. Pearson’s test was used to evaluate correlation between dyslipidemia and CsA blood levels. Data were analyzed using computer software program SPSS version 17.0 at P < 0.05 as level of significance.

4. Results

Mean age of 1391 subjects of the study population was 38.7 ± 15 years old, 849 (61%) male and 542 (39%) female. Seventy-five percent of patients received transplant kidney of living unrelated patient and 7% of living related patient and 6% of cadaveric (Table 1). Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were observed in 58.9% and 86.6% of patients, respectively. Prevalence of high LDL and low LDL was 33.4% and 61.4%, respectively. Dyslipidemia was more common in female than male, but only high LDL was statistically significant. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were more significantly detected in cadaveric (Table 2).
Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of Study Population

VariablesFemaleMaleTotal
Age, y 37 ± 15[a]39.7 ± 14[a]38.7 ± 15[a]
Sex 5428491391
Cr [b], mg/ dL 1.5 ± 0.9[a]1.7 ± 0.8[a]1.6 ± 0.9[a]
Total cholesterol, mg/dL 193.6 ± 48[a]175.8±40[a]181 ± 43.7[a]
Triglyceride, mg/dL 196.6 ± 47.7[a]183.2 ± 43.9[a]188.2 ± 45.8[a]
LDL [b], mg/dL 105 ± 35[a]100 ± 33[a]102.5 ± 34[a]
HDL [b] , mg/dL 47.7 ± 15.3[a]48.747.7 ± 15.3[a]
Co level, ng/mL 152 ± 94.6[a]151.8 ± 94.8[a]151.9 ± 94.7[a]
C2 level, ng/mL 527.5 ± 175[a]509 ± 175[a]516.6 ± 175.9[a]

aMean ± SD

bAbbreviations: Cr, creatinine; LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein

cC0, Trough level of CsA

dC2, 2-hr post-dose CsA level

Table 2.

Dyslipidemia Prevalence After Kidney Transplantation

VariablesHypercholesterolemia No. (%)P valueHypertriglyceridemia No. (%)P valueLow HDL No. (%)P valueHigh LDL No. (%)p value
Sex 0.80.20.40.01
Female349 (63.8)495 (91.3)346 (63.8)275 (50.7)
Male473 (55.7)710 (83.6)473 (55.7)364 (42.8)
Type of transplantation 0.020.10.030.06
LURP [a]597 (57.5)898 (86.5)329 (39.3)473 (61.9)
LRP [a]62 (62.6)86 (86.8)39 (39.3)47 (58)
Cadaveric58 (69)78 (92.8)34 (40.4)35 (50.7)

aAbbreviations: LRP, living related patient; LURP, living unrelated patient

aMean ± SD bAbbreviations: Cr, creatinine; LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein cC0, Trough level of CsA dC2, 2-hr post-dose CsA level aAbbreviations: LRP, living related patient; LURP, living unrelated patient The cholesterol and triglyceride level 4-12 months after transplantation were significantly higher than their level in less than 3 months and more than 1 year after kidney transplantation. The lowest level of HDL and the highest level of LDL were detected more than 1 year after transplantation (Table 3). Dyslipidemia had weak correlation with age and sex of recipient, creatinine level, C0 and C2 levels of CsA (Table 4).
Table 3.

Lipid Profile Level According to After Transplantation Time

After Transplantation TimeCholesterolP valueTriglycerideP valueHDL [a]P valueLDL [a]P value
< 3 month176 ± 500.000186.6 ± 930.00049.7 ± 140.00083 ± 310.000
4-12 month189.7 ± 47.5196.8 ± 11647 ± 15101.7 ± 34
> 12 month181.7 ± 42164.6 ± 93.945 ± 14102 ± 34

aAbbreviations: LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein

Table 4.

Dyslipidemia Correlation With Age of Recipient, Creatinine, C0 And C2 Level of Cyclosporine [a]

HypercholesterolemiaHypertriglyceridemiaLow HDLHigh LDL
Age of recipient 0.150.10.090.15
C0 [b] -0.0030.0730.007-0.02
C2 [c] 0.180.160.090.12
Cr -0.020.270.10-0.1

aCorrelation coefficient has been used

bC0, Trough level of CsA

cC2, 2-hr post-dose CsA level

aAbbreviations: LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein aCorrelation coefficient has been used bC0, Trough level of CsA cC2, 2-hr post-dose CsA level

5. Discussion

Dyslipidemia is a common complication after renal transplantation and hypertriglyceridemia is the most common type of dyslipidemia, although the current study finding on dyslipidemia prevalence is compatible with other studies, according to different dyslipidemia definitions, the type of dyslipidemia is not similar in studies (1, 12-16). Hypercholesterolemia and low HDL were significantly higher in cadaveric than living unrelated and related patients, probably due to more prevalent delayed or impaired graft function following cadaveric kidneys, which need more immunosuppressive drug than living kidney transplantation (17). Dyslipidemia is associated with cardiovascular complication and graft atherosclerosis (18). Therefore, lipid modification is an important intervention to improve outcomes. CsA and steroid are the major causes of lipid abnormalities. Hence, immunosuppressive therapy optimizing, can be a major priority in the management of kidney transplant recipients (10, 19). In the present study, trough CsA concentration and C2 level of CsA were used to guide therapy. Precision of these parameters is related to strong correlation between them and dyslipidemia development. The current study found weak correlation between dyslipidemia, trough and C2 level of CsA. Despite the stable renal function in the patients under study, slight decrease in creatinine clearance can result in decreasing cholesterol clearance and hypercholesterolemia. The major power of the current study was the large sample size, and the most important limitations were not being prospectively designed, lack of data regarding diabetes, statins using, and BMI. In the current study dyslipidemia was a common finding after kidney transplantation and had no correlation with CsA level but serum creatinine concentration and female sex are two major predictors for hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia development respectively. Therefore, to reduce hypercholesterolemia after kidney transplantation normal renal function maintaining should be strongly considered.
  19 in total

1.  Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III) final report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Cholesterol lowering with statin drugs, risk of stroke, and total mortality. An overview of randomized trials.

Authors:  P R Hebert; J M Gaziano; K S Chan; C H Hennekens
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Jul 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Influence of immunosuppressive therapy on lipoprotein(a) and other lipoproteins following renal transplantation.

Authors:  J H Brown; B G Murphy; A F Douglas; C D Short; D Bhatnagar; M I Mackness; L P Hunt; C C Doherty; P N Durrington
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.847

4.  Cyclosporine trough levels and its side effects in kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Maryam Hami; Mohammad Javad Mojahedi; Masih Naghibi; Mohammad Taghi Shakeri; Farzaneh Sharifipour
Journal:  Iran J Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.892

5.  Lipid abnormalities in cyclosporine-prednisone-treated renal transplant recipients.

Authors:  A Vathsala; R B Weinberg; L Schoenberg; J Grevel; R A Goldstein; C T Van Buren; R M Lewis; B D Kahan
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Hyperlipidaemia in renal transplant patients.

Authors:  S Aakhus; K Dahl; T E Widerøe
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Independent effects of cyclosporine and prednisone on posttransplant hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  D E Hricik; J T Mayes; J A Schulak
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 8.  Dyslipidemia following kidney transplantation: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Stéphanie Badiou; Jean-Paul Cristol; Georges Mourad
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.810

9.  Weight change and serum lipoproteins in recipients of renal allografts.

Authors:  J E Gonyea; C F Anderson
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Clinical practice guidelines for managing dyslipidemias in kidney transplant patients: a report from the Managing Dyslipidemias in Chronic Kidney Disease Work Group of the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative.

Authors:  B Kasiske; F G Cosio; J Beto; K Bolton; B M Chavers; R Grimm; A Levin; B Masri; R Parekh; C Wanner; D C Wheeler; P W F Wilson
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.086

View more
  6 in total

1.  No association between cyclosporine levels and dyslipidemia?

Authors:  Guido Filler
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2014-01-13

Review 2.  Dyslipidemia in Dermatological Disorders.

Authors:  Chetana Shenoy; Manjunath Mala Shenoy; Gururaja K Rao
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2015-10

3.  Could Salivary Cyclosporine Dosage Replace the Whole Blood Cyclosporine Measurements in Renal Transplant Patients?

Authors:  Samia Aboujaoude; Marwan Masri; Sylvana Rizk; Souleima Chamat; Jad Farha; Zeina Majzoub
Journal:  J Int Soc Prev Community Dent       Date:  2017-05-22

4.  Dyslipidemia after kidney transplantation and correlation with cyclosporine level: a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Mohamed H Ahmed
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2013-11-13

5.  Immunosuppression in renal transplantation and dyslipidemia, which factors should be considered?

Authors:  Alfredo De Giorgi; Fabio Fabbian
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2013-11-13

6.  Dyslipidemia in renal transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine a.

Authors:  Mariusz Niemczyk
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2013-11-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.