Literature DB >> 24282663

The importance of gray color as a dermoscopic clue in facial pigmented lesion evaluation: a case report.

Danica Tiodorovic-Zivkovic1, Iris Zalaudek, Aimilios Lallas, Alexander J Stratigos, Simonetta Piana, Giuseppe Argenziano.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  dermoscopy; lentigo maligna; melanoma; solar lentigo

Year:  2013        PMID: 24282663      PMCID: PMC3839831          DOI: 10.5826/dpc.0304a09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept        ISSN: 2160-9381


× No keyword cloud information.

Clinical findings

A 57-year-old man presented with a solitary flat pigmented lesion on his face, which had appeared two years previously and was slowly enlarging over time. Physical examination revealed a flat pigmented lesion, 8 mm in size, on the patient’s right cheek. The clinical diagnosis was suggestive of a solar lentigo (SL) because of the symmetric shape, the regular border, and the homogenous brown color (Figure 1). Pigmented actinic keratosis (PAK) and lentigo maligna (LM) were also included in the differential diagnosis.
Figure 1.

Clinical image of solitary flat pigmented lesion on the face. [Copyright: ©2013 Tiodorovic-Zivkovic et al.]

Dermoscopically, the lesion exhibited a brown pseudo-network and a striking gray color, especially in the center (Figure 2). There were large gray circles that resembled rhomboidal structures, though unconvincingly, in the absence of the well-known clues for the diagnosis of LM. However, the presence of gray color, asymmetrically distributed, prompted us to perform a punch biopsy and a histopathologic examination.
Figure 2.

Dermoscopic examination of the lesion showed striking gray color. [Copyright: ©2013 Tiodorovic-Zivkovic et al.]

Histopathological findings

Histopathologically, the lesion was characterized by a junctional proliferation of atypical melanocytes with pleomorphic nuclei, as solitary units that displayed crowding and uneven distribution, along with presence of junctional nests of melanocytes. In addition, melanocytes were seen in pagetoid spread. Marked solar elastosis was present within the underlying dermis (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Histopathologic examination revealed an early lentigo maligna. [Copyright: ©2013 Tiodorovic-Zivkovic et al.]

Diagnosis

Melanoma in situ (lentigo maligna type) on chronically sun damaged skin.

Discussion

The differential diagnosis of flat pigmented macules on chronically sun-damaged facial skin is challenging and includes SL or early seborrheic keratosis (SK), PAK, LM and lichen planus-like keratosis (LPLK) [1]. Especially in the context of early lesions, clinical characteristics can be insufficient to allow differentiation among these entities, since they all present as flat pigmented lesions typically developing on sun-damaged skin of elderly individuals. In contrast to their clinical similarity, these entities significantly differ in their physical course, prognosis and management strategies. Accordingly, accurate discrimination among them is mandatory. Dermoscopy improves the diagnostic accuracy when evaluating pigmented skin lesions and is nowadays considered an irreplaceable part of clinical examination of skin tumors [2]. However, evaluation of pigmented facial lesions remains challenging, even with the addition of dermoscopic information [3,4]. The traditional dermoscopic criteria of LM include asymmetrically pigmented follicles, circle within the circle, annular-granular pattern, rhomboidal structures, obliteration of the hair follicles and gray pseudo-network [5,6]. Darkening at dermoscopic examination, target-like pattern, red rhomboidal structures and increased density of the vascular network are recently described additional features [7]. Dermoscopy of a large-size LM typically reveals several of the above criteria, allowing a straightforward diagnosis. However, at earlier stages, such as the LM presented herein, dermoscopic criteria of LM have not yet fully developed. In such cases, clinical differentiation from benign pigmented lesions remains troublesome even when coupled with dermoscopy. This is because each of the classic LM criteria may also be present in SL/early SK and PAK, and only the simultaneous presence of four or more criteria has been shown to predict accurately the diagnosis of melanoma. Interestingly, all the classic LM criteria have a common denominator, namely, the gray color. The example of the patient presented here highlights that grey color can be detected even before the formation of the characteristic LM structures, such as circles or rhomboids. In our estimation, this is the single most sensitive feature for the dermoscopic recognition of early facial melanoma and its presence should always prompt the clinician to perform a biopsy. Clinical differentiation of early LM from solar lentigo/early seborrheic keratosis and pigmented actinic keratosis is challenging. Dermoscopy may enhance the clinical diagnosis, but in small sized LM the typical diagnostic criteria could be not yet fully developed. In our estimation, gray color is the single most sensitive feature for the dermoscopic recognition of facial melanoma and its presence should always prompt the clinician to perform a biopsy.
  7 in total

1.  Dermoscopy of lentigo maligna melanoma: report of 125 cases.

Authors:  P Pralong; E Bathelier; S Dalle; N Poulalhon; S Debarbieux; L Thomas
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 2.  Dermatoscopy for facial pigmented skin lesions.

Authors:  Wilhelm Stolz; Roman Schiffner; Walter H C Burgdorf
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.541

3.  Dermoscopy for early detection of facial lentigo maligna.

Authors:  M Stante; V Giorgi; I Stanganelli; B Alfaioli; P Carli
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.302

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy for melanocytic and nonmelanocytic pigmented lesions.

Authors:  Cliff Rosendahl; Philipp Tschandl; Alan Cameron; Harald Kittler
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Key points in dermoscopic differentiation between lentigo maligna and solar lentigo.

Authors:  Masaru Tanaka; Mizuki Sawada; Ken Kobayashi
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.005

6.  Dermatoscopy of flat pigmented facial lesions: diagnostic challenge between pigmented actinic keratosis and lentigo maligna.

Authors:  B N Akay; P Kocyigit; A O Heper; C Erdem
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 9.302

7.  One-year follow-up of a lentigo maligna: first dermoscopic signs of growth.

Authors:  R Schiffner; A M Perusquia; W Stolz
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.302

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Difficult-to-diagnose facial melanomas: Utility of reflectance confocal microscopy in uncovering the diagnosis.

Authors:  Lucy L Chen; Alon Scope; Nathalie De Carvalho; Harold S Rabinovitz; Giovanni Pellacani
Journal:  JAAD Case Rep       Date:  2017-08-12

2.  Dermatoscopy of flat pigmented facial lesions-evolution of lentigo maligna diagnostic criteria.

Authors:  Miguel Costa-Silva; Ana Calistru; Ana Margarida Barros; Sofia Lopes; Mariana Esteves; Filomena Azevedo
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2018-07-31

Review 3.  Cutaneous and Mucosal Melanomas of Uncommon Sites: Where Do We Stand Now?

Authors:  Emi Dika; Martina Lambertini; Cristina Pellegrini; Giulia Veronesi; Barbara Melotti; Mattia Riefolo; Francesca Sperandi; Annalisa Patrizi; Costantino Ricci; Martina Mussi; Maria Concetta Fargnoli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.