Literature DB >> 24281327

Dispensation of long-acting β agonists with or without inhaled corticosteroids, and risk of asthma-related hospitalisation: a population-based study.

Mohsen Sadatsafavi1, Larry D Lynd, Carlo A Marra, J Mark FitzGerald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of long-acting β-agonists (LABA) added to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the management of asthma is extensively debated. We thought to assess the risk of asthma-related hospitalisation in individuals who regularly filled prescriptions for ICS+LABA compared to those who regularly filled prescriptions for ICS alone or LABA alone, and compared to those who did not regularly fill such medications.
METHODS: Using administrative health databases of the province of British Columbia (BC), Canada, from 1997 to 2012, we conducted a nested case-control analysis of a cohort of asthma patients. Cases were defined as those who experienced asthma-related hospitalisation after the first year of their entry into the cohort. For each case, up to 20 controls were matched based on age, sex, date of cohort entry, and several measures of asthma severity. We categorised individuals as regularly exposed, irregularly exposed, or non-exposed to ICS alone, LABA alone, or ICS+LABA based on dispensation records in the past 12 months. The primary outcome measures were the rate ratio (RR) of the asthma-related hospitalisation among categories of regular exposure.
RESULTS: 3319 cases were matched to 43 023 controls. The RR for regular dispensation of ICS+LABA was 1.14 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.41) compared with regular dispensation of ICS alone and 0.45 (95% CI 0.29 to 0.70) compared with regular dispensation of LABA alone. Those who regularly dispensed LABA had to dispense an ICS for at least three quarters of a year to reduce their risk to that of those who did not dispense LABA.
CONCLUSIONS: Regular dispensation of ICS+LABA was not associated with an increased risk of asthma-related hospitalisation compared with regular dispensation of ICS alone. Adherence to ICS in patients who regularly receive ICS+LABA seems to be an important factor in the prevention of adverse asthma-related outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asthma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24281327     DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-203998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  4 in total

1.  A paradigm shift in the treatment of mild asthma?

Authors:  Wei Tang; Lin Sun; J Mark FizGerald
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Pharmacoepidemiological Study of Long-Acting β-agonist/Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy and Asthma Mortality: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Carlos A Camargo; Kourtney J Davis; Elizabeth B Andrews; David A Stempel; Michael Schatz
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Quality standards in respiratory real-life effectiveness research: the REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT): report from the Respiratory Effectiveness Group-European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Task Force.

Authors:  Nicolas Roche; Jonathan D Campbell; Jerry A Krishnan; Guy Brusselle; Alison Chisholm; Leif Bjermer; Mike Thomas; Eric van Ganse; Maarten van den Berge; George Christoff; Jennifer Quint; Nikolaos G Papadopoulos; David Price
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.871

4.  The REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT): development of a novel quality assurance asset to rate observational comparative effectiveness research studies.

Authors:  Jonathan D Campbell; Robert Perry; Nikolaos G Papadopoulos; Jerry Krishnan; Guy Brusselle; Alison Chisholm; Leif Bjermer; Michael Thomas; Eric van Ganse; Maarten van den Berge; Jennifer Quint; David Price; Nicolas Roche
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.871

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.