Literature DB >> 24281321

Positional priming of pop-out is nested in visuospatial context.

Ahu Gokce1, Hermann J Müller, Thomas Geyer.   

Abstract

The present study investigated facilitatory and inhibitory positional priming using a variant of Maljkovic and Nakayama's (1996) priming of pop-out task. Here, the singleton target and the distractors could be presented in different visuospatial contexts-but identical screen locations-across trials, permitting positional priming based on individual locations to be disentangled from priming based on interitem configural relations. The results revealed both significant facilitatory priming, i.e., faster reaction times (RTs) to target presented at previous target relative to previously empty locations, and inhibitory priming, i.e., slower RTs to target at previous distractor relative to previously empty locations. However, both effects were contingent on repetitions versus changes of stimulus arrangement: While facilitation of target locations was dependent on the repetition of the exact item configuration (e.g., T-type followed by T-type stimulus arrangement), the inhibitory effect was more "tolerant," being influenced by repetitions versus changes of the item's visuospatial category (T-type followed by Z-type pattern; cf. Garner & Clement, 1963). The results suggest that facilitatory and inhibitory priming are distinct phenomena (Finke et al., 2009) and that both effects are sensitive to subtle information about the arrangement of the display items (Geyer, Zehetleitner, & Müller, 2010). The results are discussed with respect to the stage(s) of visual pop-out search that are influenced by positional priming.

Keywords:  configural representations; pop-out search; positional priming; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24281321     DOI: 10.1167/13.3.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  4 in total

1.  Positional priming of visual pop-out search is supported by multiple spatial reference frames.

Authors:  Ahu Gokce; Hermann J Müller; Thomas Geyer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-16

2.  No explicit memory for individual trial display configurations in a visual search task.

Authors:  Ryan E O'Donnell; Hui Chen; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-06-07

3.  What pops out in positional priming of pop-out: insights from event-related EEG lateralizations.

Authors:  Ahu Gokce; Thomas Geyer; Kathrin Finke; Hermann J Müller; Thomas Töllner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-02

4.  Inter-trial effects in priming of pop-out: Comparison of computational updating models.

Authors:  Fredrik Allenmark; Ahu Gokce; Thomas Geyer; Artyom Zinchenko; Hermann J Müller; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 4.475

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.