Literature DB >> 24280994

Pain and embarrassment associated with urodynamic testing in women.

Jennifer Y Yeung1, Michaela A Eschenbacher, Rachel N Pauls.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Multichannel urodynamics is a series of interactive tests used to evaluate lower urinary tract dysfunction. We sought to describe symptoms and satisfaction in a cohort of women undergoing these procedures.
METHODS: Females undergoing urodynamics completed questionnaires immediately (Q1) and 1 week (Q2) after their testing. Surveys utilized visual analog scales (VAS) from 0 to 10 to assess pain, embarrassment, anxiety, and satisfaction. Q2 also inquired about urinary symptoms in the days following the procedure.
RESULTS: 100 women were analyzed. Regarding symptoms on the day of testing, VAS scores indicated low bother; with a median of 1.5/10 for pain, 0.4/10 for embarrassment, and 1.8/10 for anxiety. One week following, recall of pain (p = 0.169), and embarrassment (p = 0.722) were similar. Further analyses suggested that overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) might be associated with greater pain during and after the procedure (p = 0.04, p = 0.038 respectively), while depression was associated with greater embarrassment at those times (p = 0.018, p = 0.027 respectively). Painful bladder syndrome (PBS) was associated with a higher recall of pain (p = 0.018), and anxiety with more embarrassment (p = 0.033) on the second survey. Finally, younger age correlated with higher pain on both questionnaires (Q1: τ = - 0.148, p = 0.029; Q2: τ = - 0.171, p = 0.014). Following urodynamics, urgency was most common (43%), generally resolving within 1 day. Reassuringly, 86% would repeat urodynamics if necessary, and overall satisfaction was rated ≥9/10 at both time points.
CONCLUSION: Urodynamic testing is well-tolerated in women. Nevertheless, younger age, anxiety or depression, and a diagnosis of OAB and PBS may lead to more negative experiences. Such information may be useful in counseling future patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24280994     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2261-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  14 in total

1.  Abnormal sensitization and temporal summation of second pain (wind-up) in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome.

Authors:  R Staud; C J Vierck; R L Cannon; A P Mauderli; D D Price
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Morbidity of urodynamic investigation in healthy women.

Authors:  Soren Brostrom; P Jennum; G Lose
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2002

3.  The visual analog scale allows effective measurement of preoperative anxiety and detection of patients' anesthetic concerns.

Authors:  C H Kindler; C Harms; F Amsler; T Ihde-Scholl; D Scheidegger
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Tolerability and morbidity of urodynamic testing: a questionnaire-based study.

Authors:  Teruhiko Yokoyama; Kunihiro Nozaki; Hiroyuki Nose; Miyabi Inoue; Yasuhiro Nishiyama; Hiromi Kumon
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Patient satisfaction with urodynamics: a qualitative study.

Authors:  C Shaw; K Williams; P R Assassa; C Jackson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.187

6.  Morbidity of the evaluation of the lower urinary tract with transurethral multichannel pressure-flow studies.

Authors:  H C Klingler; S Madersbacher; B Djavan; G Schatzl; M Marberger; C P Schmidbauer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 7.  Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence.

Authors:  J L Martin; K S Williams; K R Abrams; D A Turner; A J Sutton; C Chapple; R P Assassa; C Shaw; F Cheater
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.014

8.  How painful is multichannel urodynamic testing?

Authors:  Yakir Segev; Talma Rosen; Ron Auslender; Lena Dain; Yoram Abramov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-04-24

9.  Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED.

Authors:  E John Gallagher; Polly E Bijur; Clarke Latimer; Wendy Silver
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.469

10.  Evidence of augmented central pain processing in idiopathic chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Thorsten Giesecke; Richard H Gracely; Masilo A B Grant; Alf Nachemson; Frank Petzke; David A Williams; Daniel J Clauw
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-02
View more
  6 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of anxiety, pain, and embarrassment associated with cystoscopy and urodynamic testing in clinical practice.

Authors:  Xavier Biardeau; Ornella Lam; Van Ba; Lysanne Campeau; Jacques Corcos
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Randomized controlled trial of the effect of environment on patient embarrassment and anxiety with urodynamics.

Authors:  Azadeh Rezvan; Stephanie Amaya; Lance Betson; Tajnoos Yazdany
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  A Telephone Call to Decrease Patient Anxiety Before Urodynamic Testing: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hussein Warda; Michele R Hacker; Miriam J Haviland; Lekha S Hota
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 2.091

4.  Patient perceptions of physical and emotional discomfort related to urodynamic testing: a questionnaire-based study in men and women with and without neurologic conditions.

Authors:  Anne M Suskind; J Quentin Clemens; Samuel R Kaufman; John T Stoffel; Ann Oldendorf; Bahaa S Malaeb; Teresa Jandron; Anne P Cameron
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Feasibility of a deep learning-based diagnostic platform to evaluate lower urinary tract disorders in men using simple uroflowmetry.

Authors:  Seokhwan Bang; Sokhib Tukhtaev; Kwang Jin Ko; Deok Hyun Han; Minki Baek; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Baek Hwan Cho; Kyu-Sung Lee
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-03-25

Review 6.  Acceptability and perceived value of urodynamics from the patient perspective: A narrative review.

Authors:  Maurizio Serati; Andrea Braga; Peter F W M Rosier; Stefan de Wachter; Alan Uren; Enrico Finazzi-Agrò
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.367

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.