Literature DB >> 24280856

Test-enhanced web-based learning: optimizing the number of questions (a randomized crossover trial).

David A Cook1, Warren G Thompson, Kris G Thomas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Questions enhance learning in Web-based courses, but preliminary evidence suggests that too many questions may interfere with learning. The authors sought to determine how varying the number of self-assessment questions affects knowledge outcomes in a Web-based course.
METHOD: The authors conducted a randomized crossover trial in one internal medicine and one family medicine residency program between January 2009 and July 2010. Eight Web-based modules on ambulatory medicine topics were developed, with varying numbers of self-assessment questions (0, 1, 5, 10, or 15). Participants completed modules in four different formats each year, with sequence randomly assigned. Participants completed a pretest for half their modules. Outcomes included knowledge, completion time, and module ratings.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty residents provided data. The mean (standard error) percent correct knowledge score was 53.2 (0.8) for pretests and 73.7 (0.5) for posttests. In repeated-measures analysis pooling all data, mean posttest knowledge scores were highest for the 10- and 15-question formats (75.7 [1.1] and 74.4 [1.0], respectively) and lower for 0-, 1-, and 5-question formats (73.1 [1.3], 72.9 [1.0], and 72.8 [1.5], respectively); P = .04 for differences across all modules. Modules with more questions generally took longer to complete and were rated higher, although differences were small. Residents most often identified 10 questions as ideal. Posttest knowledge scores were higher for modules that included a pretest (75.4 [0.9] versus 72.2 [0.9]; P = .0002).
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the number of self-assessment questions improves learning until a plateau beyond which additional questions do not add value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24280856     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  7 in total

1.  Development and validation of a theoretical test of proficiency for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Authors:  Mona Meral Savran; Henrik Jessen Hansen; René Horsleben Petersen; William Walker; Thomas Schmid; Signe Rolskov Bojsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Teaching and assessing professionalism in medical learners and practicing physicians.

Authors:  Paul S Mueller
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2015-04-29

3.  Test-Enhanced E-Learning Strategies in Postgraduate Medical Education: A Randomized Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lisa A DelSignore; Traci A Wolbrink; David Zurakowski; Jeffrey P Burns
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  WittyFit-Live Your Work Differently: Study Protocol for a Workplace-Delivered Health Promotion.

Authors:  Frédéric Dutheil; Martine Duclos; Geraldine Naughton; Samuel Dewavrin; Thomas Cornet; Pascal Huguet; Jean-Claude Chatard; Bruno Pereira
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-04-13

5.  Interactive, case-based seminars in the digitized pediatrics block internship from the students' perspective.

Authors:  Andrea Heinzmann; Sebastian Bode; Johannes Forster; Jan Berger
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-28

6.  Engagement and learning in an electronic spaced repetition curriculum companion for a paediatrics academic half-day curriculum.

Authors:  Jason R McConnery; Ereny Bassilious; Quang N Ngo
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2021-09-13

7.  Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.

Authors:  Jason L Walsh; Benjamin H L Harris; Paul Denny; Phil Smith
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 2.401

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.