Literature DB >> 24280838

Script concordance testing: assessing residents' clinical decision-making skills for infant lumbar punctures.

Todd P Chang1, David Kessler, Brett McAninch, Daniel M Fein, D J Scherzer, Elizabeth Seelbach, Pavan Zaveri, Jennifer M Jackson, Marc Auerbach, Renuka Mehta, Wendy Van Ittersum, Martin V Pusic.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Residents must learn which infants require a lumbar puncture (LP), a clinical decision-making skill (CDMS) difficult to evaluate because of considerable practice variation. The authors created an assessment model of the CDMS to determine when an LP is indicated, taking practice variation into account. The objective was to detect whether script concordance testing (SCT) could measure CDMS competency among residents for performing infant LPs.
METHOD: In 2011, using a modified Delphi technique, an expert panel of 14 attending physicians constructed 15 case vignettes (each with 2 to 4 SCT questions) that represented various infant LP scenarios. The authors distributed the vignettes to residents at 10 academic pediatric centers within the International Simulation in Pediatric Innovation, Research, and Education Network. They compared SCT scores among residents of different postgraduate years (PGYs), specialties, training in adult medicine, LP experience, and practice within an endemic Lyme disease area.
RESULTS: Of 730 eligible residents, 102 completed 47 SCT questions. They could earn a maximum score of 47. Median SCT scores were significantly higher in PGY-3s compared with PGY-1s (difference: 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-4.9; effect size d = 0.87). Scores also increased with increasing LP experience (difference: 3.3; 95% CI 1.1-5.5) and with adult medicine training (difference: 2.9; 95% CI 0.6-5.0). Residents in Lyme-endemic areas tended to perform more LPs than those in nonendemic areas.
CONCLUSIONS: SCT questions may be useful as an assessment tool to determine CDMS competency among residents for performing infant LPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24280838     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  5 in total

1.  Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: Extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements.

Authors:  Adam Cheng; David Kessler; Ralph Mackinnon; Todd P Chang; Vinay M Nadkarni; Elizabeth A Hunt; Jordan Duval-Arnould; Yiqun Lin; David A Cook; Martin Pusic; Joshua Hui; David Moher; Matthias Egger; Marc Auerbach
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2016-07-24

2.  Case-Based Teaching: Does the Addition of High-Fidelity Simulation Make a Difference in Medical Students' Clinical Reasoning Skills?

Authors:  Mary Kathryn Mutter; James R Martindale; Neeral Shah; Maryellen E Gusic; Stephen J Wolf
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-01-10

3.  Assessment of Emergency Medicine Residents' Clinical Reasoning: Validation of a Script Concordance Test.

Authors:  Eric Steinberg; Ethan Cowan; Michelle P Lin; Anthony Sielicki; Steven Warrington
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-06-24

4.  Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements.

Authors:  Adam Cheng; David Kessler; Ralph Mackinnon; Todd P Chang; Vinay M Nadkarni; Elizabeth A Hunt; Jordan Duval-Arnould; Yiqun Lin; David A Cook; Martin Pusic; Joshua Hui; David Moher; Matthias Egger; Marc Auerbach
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-25

5.  Conducting multicenter research in healthcare simulation: Lessons learned from the INSPIRE network.

Authors:  Adam Cheng; David Kessler; Ralph Mackinnon; Todd P Chang; Vinay M Nadkarni; Elizabeth A Hunt; Jordan Duval-Arnould; Yiqun Lin; Martin Pusic; Marc Auerbach
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.