Literature DB >> 24280651

Surgical navigation in urology: European perspective.

Jens Rassweiler1, Marie-Claire Rassweiler, Michael Müller, Hannes Kenngott, Hans-Peter Meinzer, Dogu Teber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Use of virtual reality to navigate open and endoscopic surgery has significantly evolved during the last decade. Current status of seven most interesting projects inside the European Association of Urology section of uro-technology is summarized with review of literature. RECENT
FINDINGS: Marker-based endoscopic tracking during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using high-definition technology reduces positive margins. Marker-based endoscopic tracking during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy by mechanical overlay of three-dimensional-segmented virtual anatomy is helpful during planning of trocar placement and dissection of renal hilum. Marker-based, iPAD-assisted puncture of renal collecting system shows more benefit for trainees with reduction of radiation exposure. Three-dimensional laser-assisted puncture of renal collecting system using Uro-Dyna-CT realized in an ex-vivo model enables minimal radiation time. Electromagnetic tracking for puncture of renal collecting system using a sensor at the tip of ureteral catheter worked in an in-vivo model of porcine ureter and kidney. Attitude tracking for ultrasound-guided puncture of renal tumours by accelerometer reduces the puncture error from 4.7 to 1.8 mm. Feasibility of electromagnetic and optical tracking with the da Vinci telemanipulator was shown in vitro as well as using in-vivo model of oesophagectomy. Target registration error was 11.2 mm because of soft-tissue deformation.
SUMMARY: Intraoperative navigation is helpful during percutaneous puncture collecting system and biopsy of renal tumour using various tracking techniques. Early clinical studies demonstrate advantages of marker-based navigation during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy. Combination of different tracking techniques may further improve this interesting addition to video-assisted surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24280651     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Robotics and intraoperative navigation].

Authors:  D S Schoeb; J Rassweiler; A Sigle; A Miernik; C Engels; A S Goezen; D Teber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  The evolution of image guidance in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP): a glimpse into the future.

Authors:  Joshua Makary; Danielle C van Diepen; Ranjan Arianayagam; George McClintock; Jeremy Fallot; Scott Leslie; Ruban Thanigasalam
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-09-04

Review 3.  The evolution of three-dimensional technology in musculoskeletal oncology.

Authors:  Vishaal Nanik Thadani; Muhammad Jahangir Riaz; Gurpal Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-07-25

4.  Virtual simulation, preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Vasilii Dubrovin; Alexandr Egoshin; Alexey Rozhentsov; Dmitrii Batuhtin; Ruslan Eruslanov; Dmitrii Chernishov; Yacov Furman; Alexey Baev
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2019-04-23

5.  Expert Involvement Predicts mHealth App Downloads: Multivariate Regression Analysis of Urology Apps.

Authors:  Nuno Pereira-Azevedo; Luís Osório; Vitor Cavadas; Avelino Fraga; Eduardo Carrasquinho; Eduardo Cardoso de Oliveira; Miguel Castelo-Branco; Monique J Roobol
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Navigation in Musculoskeletal Oncology: An Overview.

Authors:  Guy Vernon Morris; Jonathan D Stevenson; Scott Evans; Michael C Parry; Lee Jeys
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.251

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.