Literature DB >> 24280445

Incongruent object/context relationships in visual scenes: where are they processed in the brain?

Florence Rémy1, Nathalie Vayssière2, Delphine Pins3, Muriel Boucart3, Michèle Fabre-Thorpe2.   

Abstract

Rapid object visual categorization in briefly flashed natural scenes is influenced by the surrounding context. The neural correlates underlying reduced categorization performance in response to incongruent object/context associations remain unclear and were investigated in the present study using fMRI. Participants were instructed to categorize objects in briefly presented scenes (exposure duration=100ms). Half of the scenes consisted of objects pasted in an expected (congruent) context, whereas for the other half, objects were embedded in incongruent contexts. Object categorization was more accurate and faster in congruent relative to incongruent scenes. Moreover, we found that the two types of scenes elicited different patterns of cerebral activation. In particular, the processing of incongruent scenes induced increased activations in the parahippocampal cortex, as well as in the right frontal cortex. This higher activity may indicate additional neural processing of the novel (non experienced) contextual associations that were inherent to the incongruent scenes. Moreover, our results suggest that the locus of object categorization impairment due to contextual incongruence is in the right anterior parahippocampal cortex. Indeed in this region activity was correlated with the reaction time increase observed with incongruent scenes. Representations for associations between objects and their usual context of appearance might be encoded in the right anterior parahippocampal cortex.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Congruence; Contextual associations; Natural scenes; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24280445     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  12 in total

1.  Parietal cortex integrates contextual and saliency signals during the encoding of natural scenes in working memory.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Simona Arianna Di Francesco; Serena Mastroberardino; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Diminution of context association memory structure in subjects with subjective cognitive decline.

Authors:  Ling-Yun Fan; Ya-Mei Lai; Ta-Fu Chen; Yung-Chin Hsu; Pin-Yu Chen; Kuo-Zhou Huang; Ting-Wen Cheng; Wen-Yi Isaac Tseng; Mau-Sun Hua; Ya-Fang Chen; Ming-Jang Chiu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Does valence influence perceptual bias towards incongruence during binocular rivalry?

Authors:  Angel Anna Zacharia; Navdeep Ahuja; Simran Kaur; Nalin Mehta; Ratna Sharma
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2020-02-21

4.  Interaction between Scene and Object Processing Revealed by Human fMRI and MEG Decoding.

Authors:  Talia Brandman; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Disconnection of the Perirhinal and Postrhinal Cortices Impairs Recognition of Objects in Context But Not Contextual Fear Conditioning.

Authors:  Victoria R Heimer-McGinn; Devon L Poeta; Krishan Aghi; Methma Udawatta; Rebecca D Burwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Associative Processing Is Inherent in Scene Perception.

Authors:  Elissa M Aminoff; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Do simultaneously viewed objects influence scene recognition individually or as groups? Two perceptual studies.

Authors:  Christopher R Gagne; Sean P MacEvoy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Heightened Responses of the Parahippocampal and Retrosplenial Cortices during Contextualized Recognition of Congruent Objects.

Authors:  Daina Crafa; Colin Hawco; Mathieu B Brodeur
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Auditory conflict and congruence in frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Camilla N Clark; Jennifer M Nicholas; Jennifer L Agustus; Christopher J D Hardy; Lucy L Russell; Emilie V Brotherhood; Katrina M Dick; Charles R Marshall; Catherine J Mummery; Jonathan D Rohrer; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Shared and Distinct Neural Bases of Large- and Small-Scale Spatial Ability: A Coordinate-Based Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yuan Li; Feng Kong; Ming Ji; Yangmei Luo; Jijun Lan; Xuqun You
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.