Literature DB >> 24280311

Prognostic difference between paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Bun Yashiro1, Yuichiro Minami2, Yutaka Terajima1, Nobuhisa Hagiwara1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The association of atrial fibrillation (AF) with sudden death and the difference in prognostic significance between paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal AF remains unclear in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Our aim was to investigate the clinical significance of AF, and to assess the prognostic difference between paroxysmal and non-paroxysmal AF in HCM patients.
METHODS: The study included 430 HCM patients. Documentation of AF was based on electrocardiograms obtained either after the acute onset of symptoms or fortuitously during routine examination of asymptomatic patients.
RESULTS: AF was detected in 120 patients (27.9%). In the patients with AF, syncope and non-sustained ventricular tachycardia were more frequent and the left atrial dimension was larger. Multivariate analysis showed that AF was an independent determinant of the outcome, including the risk of HCM-related death (adjusted hazard ratio 3.57, p<0.001) and sudden death (adjusted hazard ratio 2.61, p=0.038). When patients with AF were divided into subgroups with paroxysmal AF (n=75) or non-paroxysmal AF (n=45), only paroxysmal AF was identified as an independent determinant of the outcome, including the risk of HCM-related death (adjusted hazard ratio 5.24, p<0.001) and sudden death (adjusted hazard ratio 4.67, p=0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: AF is a common supraventricular arrhythmia in HCM and has an adverse influence on the prognosis. In addition, each type of AF had a different clinical impact, with paroxysmal AF being a significant independent determinant of an adverse outcome, including sudden death.
Copyright © 2013 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Cardiomyopathies; Hypertrophic; Prognosis; Sudden death

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24280311     DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2013.10.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol        ISSN: 0914-5087            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Prognostic impact of atrial fibrillation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Patricia Alphonse; Sohaib Virk; Jhonna Collins; Timothy Campbell; Stuart P Thomas; Christopher Semsarian; Saurabh Kumar
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 2.  Atrial Fibrillation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Diagnosis and Considerations for Management.

Authors:  Monica Patten; Simon Pecha; Ali Aydin
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2018-02-28

Review 3.  Ischaemic events in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with and without atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tiffany T S Ye; Qi Zhuang Siah; Benjamin Y Q Tan; Jamie S Y Ho; Nicholas L X Syn; Yao Hao Teo; Yao Neng Teo; James W Yip; Tiong-Cheng Yeo; Weiqin Lin; Raymond C C Wong; Ping Chai; Bernard Chan; Vijay Kumar Sharma; Leonard L L Yeo; Ching-Hui Sia
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 5.221

Review 4.  Atrial fibrillation is associated with sudden cardiac death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pattara Rattanawong; Sikarin Upala; Tanawan Riangwiwat; Veeravich Jaruvongvanich; Anawin Sanguankeo; Wasawat Vutthikraivit; Eugene H Chung
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yoga Waranugraha; Ardian Rizal; Dion Setiawan; Indra Jabbar Aziz
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2020-11-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.