Literature DB >> 24279276

Mechanisms underlying plant sexual dimorphism in multi-trophic arthropod communities.

William K Petry1, Kayla I Perry, Aleshia Fremgen, Sarahi K Rudeen, Mitchell Lopez, John Dryburgh, Kailen A Mooney.   

Abstract

A growing body of research documents the importance of plant genetic effects on arthropod community structure. However, the mechanisms underlying these effects are often unclear. Additionally, plant genetic effects have largely been quantified in common gardens, thus inflating the estimates of their importance by minimizing levels of natural variation. Using Valeriana edulis, a dioecious plant with genetically based sex determination, we conducted surveys and experiments on wild-grown individuals to document field patterns of arthropod association between the sexes and the mechanisms underlying these plant genetic effects. Three years of surveys revealed strong and consistent sex-biased arthropod association in wild-grown plants: female plants supported 4-fold, 1.5-fold, and 4-fold higher densities of aphids, aphid predators, and aphid-tending ants, respectively, compared to males. There was mixed evidence that the female bias for aphids was due to higher plant quality, while we found no difference between plant sexes in aphid preference or the top-down effects of predators and tending ants. Female bias for ants was due to both the greater attractiveness of female plants (direct effect mediated by floral nectar) and an independent, weaker effect of higher aphid abundance on females (density-mediated indirect effect). Conversely, the female bias for predators was driven solely by the greater attractiveness of female plants. We did not find interaction modification, i.e., ant-aphid and predator-aphid interactions were equivalent between plant sexes. Plant sex explained 0.24%, 2.28%, and 4.42% of the variance in aphids, predators, and ants, respectively, values comparable to but slightly weaker than those previously reported from common-garden studies. In contrast to the prediction of diminished plant genetic effects with increasing trophic level, we show how weak indirect effects on predators and parasitoids (via herbivores) can be complemented by strong direct effects via common plant traits (floral resources). In summary, we document direct and indirect effects of genetically based sex on a multi-trophic arthropod community that were expressed in wild-grown plants across multiple years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24279276     DOI: 10.1890/12-2170.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  6 in total

1.  Plant breeding systems influence the seasonal dynamics of plant-pollinator networks in a subtropical forest.

Authors:  Minhua Zhang; Fangliang He
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Does sexual dimorphism predispose dioecious riparian trees to sex ratio imbalances under climate change?

Authors:  Kevin R Hultine; Susan E Bush; Joy K Ward; Todd E Dawson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Relative effects of genetic variation sensu lato and sexual dimorphism on plant traits and associated arthropod communities.

Authors:  Colleen S Nell; Maria M Meza-Lopez; Jordan R Croy; Annika S Nelson; Xoaquín Moreira; Jessica D Pratt; Kailen A Mooney
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Sex-specific morphological and physiological differences in the moss Ceratodon purpureus (Dicranales).

Authors:  Mandy L Slate; Todd N Rosenstiel; Sarah M Eppley
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  The differences in cocoon and silk qualities among sex-related mulberry and silkworm feeding groups.

Authors:  Chunlan Bu; Rui Zheng; Gaiqun Huang; Jianmei Wu; Gang Liu; Marion L Donald; Tingfa Dong; Xiao Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Traits underlying community consequences of plant intra-specific diversity.

Authors:  Luis Abdala-Roberts; Riley Pratt; Jessica D Pratt; Kailen A Mooney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.