Literature DB >> 24279261

Estimating extinction from species--area relationships: why the numbers do not add up.

Fangliang He1, Stephen Hubbell.   

Abstract

Researchers commonly use species-area relationships (SAR) to estimate extinction rates caused by habitat loss by reversing the SAR, extrapolating backward from area to calculate expected species loss. We have previously shown that the backward SAR method considerably overestimates extinction rates due to a previously unrecognized sampling artifact. Jacob Bock Axelsen, Uri Roll, Lewi Stone, and Andrew Solow recently argued that the backward SAR method is correct and the method does not overestimate extinction rates. In this paper, we further elaborate and clarify our previous results. We show that the backward SAR method gives the correct extinction rate only under a strict complementary-area sampling design, which is not used in practice because it requires knowing which species are endemic to the area of destroyed habitat, or the number of species in the complementary area. Because of this problem, researchers substitute a power-law model for the SAR in the backward SAR equation. However, this substitution violates the backward SAR method's requirement for complementary sampling. With this model substitution, the backward SAR equation is no longer correct, except in the special case of randomly distributed species. For the complementary sampling or random distribution of species, the first individual of a species to be encountered and the last individual to be encountered to lose the species are exchangeable (or the same individual). But this is not the case for other sampling designs or if species are not randomly distributed and explains why the backward SAR method fails to correctly estimate extinction rates. Our proofs and results are general and explain the widely recognized overestimation of extinction by the backward SAR method. We suggest future directions for developing general theory for estimating species extinction from species-area relationships. Until then, however, the backward SAR method should not be used to estimate species extinction in practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24279261     DOI: 10.1890/12-1795.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  7 in total

1.  Estimation of species extinction: what are the consequences when total species number is unknown?

Authors:  Youhua Chen
Journal:  Theory Biosci       Date:  2014-04-19       Impact factor: 1.919

2.  Improving extinction projections across scales and habitats using the countryside species-area relationship.

Authors:  Inês Santos Martins; Henrique Miguel Pereira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-10       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Historical records reveal the distinctive associations of human disturbance and extreme climate change with local extinction of mammals.

Authors:  Xinru Wan; Guangshun Jiang; Chuan Yan; Fangliang He; Rongsheng Wen; Jiayin Gu; Xinhai Li; Jianzhang Ma; Nils Chr Stenseth; Zhibin Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Species-area relationships and biodiversity loss in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  Ryan A Chisholm; Felix Lim; Yi Shuen Yeoh; Wei Wei Seah; Richard Condit; James Rosindell
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  On the decline of biodiversity due to area loss.

Authors:  Petr Keil; David Storch; Walter Jetz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Quantifying the effects of climate and anthropogenic change on regional species loss in China.

Authors:  Jinxing He; Chuan Yan; Marcel Holyoak; Xinru Wan; Guoyu Ren; Yangfang Hou; Yan Xie; Zhibin Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Predictive sampling effort and species-area relationship models for estimating richness in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  Noé U de la Sancha; Sarah A Boyle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.