Literature DB >> 24279123

Diagnostic capability of gadoxetate disodium-enhanced liver MRI for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with multi-detector CT.

Naoyuki Toyota1, Yuko Nakamura, Masashi Hieda, Naoko Akiyama, Hiroaki Terada, Noriaki Matsuura, Masayo Nishiki, Hirotaka Kono, Hiroshi Kohno, Toshimitsu Irei, Yukinobu Yoshikawa, Kazuya Kuraoka, Kiyomi Taniyama, Kazuo Awai.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic capability of gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB)-MRI for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with multidetector CT (MDCT). Fifty patients with 57 surgically proven HCCs who underwent Gd-EOB-MRI and MDCT from March 2008 to June 2011 were evaluated. Two observers evaluated MR and CT on a lesion-by-lesion basis. We analyzed sensitivity by grading on a 5-point scale, the degree of arterial enhancement and the differences in histological grades in the diffusion-weighted images (DWI). The results showed that the sensitivity of Gd-EOB-MRI was higher than that of MDCT especially for HCCs that were 1 cm in diameter or smaller. The hepatobiliary phase was useful for the detecting of small HCC. We had few cases in which it was difficult to judge HCC in the arterial enhancement between MRI and MDCT. In the diffusion-weighted image, well differentiated HCC tended to show a low signal intensity, and poorly differentiated HCC tended to show a high signal intensity. In moderately differentiated HCC's, the mean diameter of the high signal intensity group was larger than that of the low signal intensity group (24.5 mm vs. 15.8 mm). In conclusion, Gd-EOB-MRI tended to show higher sensitivity compared to MDCT in the detection of HCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24279123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hiroshima J Med Sci        ISSN: 0018-2052


  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced 3-T MR Imaging for Malignant Liver Lesions by Using Ex Vivo MR Imaging-matched Pathologic Findings as the Reference Standard.

Authors:  Eduardo A C Costa; Guilherme M Cunha; Emmanuil Smorodinsky; Irene Cruite; An Tang; Robert M Marks; Lisa Clark; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony Gamst; Jason K Sicklick; Alan Hemming; Michael R Peterson; Michael S Middleton; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  A study on the inconsistency of arterial phase hypervascularity detection between contrast-enhanced ultrasound using sonazoid and gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid magnetic resonance imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma lesions.

Authors:  Feiqian Wang; Kazushi Numata; Makoto Chuma; Haruo Miwa; Satoshi Moriya; Katsuaki Ogushi; Masahiro Okada; Masako Otani; Yoshiaki Inayama; Shin Maeda
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 1.314

3.  Intraoperative ultrasonography and surgical strategy in hepatic resection: What difference does it make?

Authors:  Ricky Jrearz; Richard Hart; Shiva Jayaraman
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Consensus report from the 7th International Forum for Liver Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Elmar M Merkle; Christoph J Zech; Carlo Bartolozzi; Mustafa R Bashir; Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah; Alexander Huppertz; Jeong Min Lee; Jens Ricke; Michiie Sakamoto; Claude B Sirlin; Sheng-Long Ye; Mengsu Zeng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl Diethylenetriamine Pentaacetic Acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Multidetector-Row Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng Ye; Jun Liu; Han Ouyang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.