| Literature DB >> 24278672 |
Abstract
Congenital and idiopathic scoliosis represent disabling conditions of the spine. While congenital scoliosis (CS) is caused by morphogenic abnormalities in vertebral development, the cause(s) for idiopathic scoliosis is (are) likely to be varied, representing alterations in skeletal growth, neuromuscular imbalances, disturbances involving communication between the brain and spine, and others. Both conditions are characterized by phenotypic and genetic heterogeneities, which contribute to the difficulties in understanding their genetic basis that investigators face. Despite the differences between these two conditions there is observational and experimental evidence supporting common genetic mechanisms. This paper focuses on the clinical features of both CS and IS and highlights genetic and environmental factors which contribute to their occurrence. It is anticipated that emerging genetic technologies and improvements in phenotypic stratification of both conditions will facilitate improved understanding of the genetic basis for these conditions and enable targeted prevention and treatment strategies.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 24278672 PMCID: PMC3820596 DOI: 10.6064/2012/152365
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Scientifica (Cairo) ISSN: 2090-908X
Figure 1Diagram of spine illustrating defects of formation (wedge and hemivertebrae) and segmentation (vertebral bar and block vertebrae). Reprinted with permission from McMaster [6].
Figure 23D reconstruction illustrating congenital scoliosis. Left T4 hemivertebrae displayed. Courtesy of Dr. Kenneth Noonan.
Figure 3Algorithm for International Consortium for Vertebral Anomalies and Scoliosis (ICVAS) classification of congenital vertebral malformation. Reproduced with permission Expert opinion in [7]. Reproduced from Expert Opinion in Expert Opin. Med. Diagn. (2008) 2(10):1107-1121 with permission of Informa UK Ltd.
Figure 4Illustration of somite formation from the presomitic mesoderm (PSM) in the chick embryo. Paired somites are formed every 90 minutes in a periodic fashion every 90 minutes shown in (a). (b).A molecular clocked linked to segmentation by dynamic and periodic expression of the cyclic genes in the PSM. Top: Lunatic Fringe mRNA expression appears as a wave sweeping across the whole PSM once during each somite formation as illustrated by in situ hybridization in this 17-somite-old chick embryo. During each somite formations, PSM cells illustrated by the dot undergo a phase of upregulation of the cycling genes followed by a phase of down regulation of these genes. Bottom: As shown in this schematic representation of the progression of somitogenesis in the embryo, the cycles of expression of the cyclic genes will last while the cells remain in the PSM, which corresponds approximately to the time to form 12 somites in the chick embryo. These PSM cells undergo 12 oscillations of the expression of the cycling genes. Reproduced with permission Expert Opinion in [9]. Reproduced from Expert Opinion in Expert Opin. Med. Diagn. (2008) 2(10):1107-1121 with permission of Informa UK Ltd.
Figure 5Radiographic features of spondylocostal dystostosis including contiguous vertebral malformations with asymmetric rib malformations. Photograph courtesy of Peter D. Turnpenny M.D., Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital.
Figure 6Radiograph features of spondylothoracic dysostosis demonstrating contiguous vertebral malformations with symmetric posterior rib fusion. Reproduced with permission Expert Opinion in [9].
Some syndromes that include congenital vertebral malformations.
| Syndrome | OMIM reference | Corresponding gene(s) |
|---|---|---|
| Acrofacial dysostosis* |
| |
| Aicardi* |
| |
| Alagille |
|
|
| Anhalt* |
| |
| Atelosteogenesis III |
|
|
| Campomelic dysplasia |
|
|
| Casamassima-Morton-Nance* |
| |
| Caudal regression* |
| |
| Cerebro-facio-thoracic dysplasia* |
| |
| CHARGE |
|
|
| “Chromosomal” | ||
| Currarino |
|
|
| DeLa Chapelle* |
| |
| DeGeorge/Sedlackova |
| Microdeletion, 10p13-p14, 22q11.2, |
| Dysspondylochondromatosis* | ||
| Femoral hypoplasia-unusual facies* |
| |
| Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressive |
|
|
| Fryns-Moerman* | ||
| Goldenhar*(Oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum) |
| |
| Incontinentia Pigmenti |
|
|
| Kabuki |
|
|
| Kaufman-McKusick |
|
|
| KBG Syndrome* |
| |
| Klippel-Feil* |
| ? |
| Larsen |
|
|
| Lower mesodermal agenesis* | ||
| Maternal diabetes* | ||
| MURCS Association* |
| |
| Multiple Pterygium Syndrome |
|
|
| OEIS Syndrome* |
| |
| Phaver* |
| |
| Rapadilino |
|
|
| Robinow |
|
|
| Rolland-Desbuquois* |
| |
| Rokitansky Sequence* |
| ? |
| Silverman |
|
|
| Simpson-Golabi-Behmel |
|
|
| Sirenomelia* |
| |
| Spondylocarpotarsal Synostosis |
|
|
| Spondylocostal Dysostosis |
|
|
| Spondylothoracic Dysotosis* |
|
|
| Thakker-Donnai* |
| |
| Toriello* | ||
| Urioste* | ||
| VATER/VACTERL* |
| |
| Verloove-Vanhorick* |
| |
| Wildevanck* |
| |
| Zimmer* |
|
*Underlying cause not known. Reproduced from Expert Opinion in Expert Opin. Med. Diagn. (2008) 2(10):1107-1121 with permission of Informa UK Ltd.
Summary of prior genetic linkage studies for IS.
| Study | No. of | Region(s) | Model | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wise et al. [ | 1/14 | 6q | Autosomal dominant | Genome wide search in one family of French Acadian and English descent (7 affected members), with validation of “hot spots” in a second large family |
|
| ||||
| Chan et al. [ | 7/52 | 19p13.3 | Autosomal dominant | Recruited Asian patients in whom scoliosis developed in adolescence |
|
| ||||
|
Baghernajad Salehi et al. [ | 1/17 | 17p.11 | Autosomal dominant | 3 generation Italian family |
|
| ||||
| Justice et al. [ | 202/1198 | Xq23 | X-linked dominant | Maximum lod score of 1.69 (theta = 0.2) identified at marker GATA172D05. A lod score of 2.23 for this marker was found in one family with six affected individuals |
|
| ||||
| Morcuende et al. [ | 47/176 | 4q35 | N/A | No linkage to |
|
| ||||
| Bashiardes et al. [ | 7 individuals | 8p23.2-8q11.21 | Autosomal dominant | Pericentric inversion in chromosome 8 disrupts |
|
| ||||
| Miller et al. [ | 202/1198 | 6, 9, 16 and 17 | Autosomal dominant | Model independent linkage analysis |
|
| ||||
| Alden et al. [ | 202/1198 | 19p11.3 | Autosomal dominant | Threshold of curvature set at 30°. Fibrillin 3, thromboxane A2 receptor, possible candidates |
|
| ||||
|
Baghernajad Salehi et al. [ | 1500 individuals | Chromosome 3 | Autosomal dominant | Patients' familial relationships established through database |
|
| ||||
| Gao et al. [ | 52 | 8q | N/A | CHD7 Gene polymorphisms are associated with susceptibility to idiopathic scoliosis |
|
| ||||
|
Ocaka et al. [ | 25/208 | 9q31.2-q34.2; | Autosomal dominant | Confirmation of 9q [ |
|
| ||||
| Raggio et al. [ | 7/48 | 12p13.3 | Autosomal dominant; autosomal recessive | All families contribute to recessive model. 5/7 families contribute to the dominant model |
|
| ||||
| Gurnett et al. [ | 1/22 | 18q | Autosomal dominant | LOD score 3.86 |
|
| ||||
| Sharma et al. [ | 419 | 3p26.3 ( | N/A | GWAS study. |
|
| ||||
| Takahashi et al. [ | 1050 |
| N/A | GWAS study. LBX1 is determinant of dorsal spinal neurons; altered somatosensory function |