Literature DB >> 2427842

Celiprolol in the treatment of hypertension: a comparison with propranolol.

S H Taylor, A Beattie, B Silke.   

Abstract

A randomized double-blind study compared the antihypertensive efficacy of single daily oral doses of celiprolol 200 or 400 mg to twice daily doses of propranolol 40 or 80 mg in 58 patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension (supine diastolic blood pressure range 95-114 mm Hg). Before treatment there was no significant difference in patient characteristics or in the average systolic or diastolic blood pressures or heart rates between the two groups. Sixty-five percent of the celiprolol group and 56% of the patients randomized to propranolol achieved blood pressure control on the lowest dose of each drug. The mean reductions in the systolic and diastolic pressures at the end of the 4 week titration period were -14/-13 mm Hg for the celiprolol group and -11/-12 mm Hg for the propranolol group. Continued treatment with the same doses of celiprolol and propranolol for a further 8 weeks resulted in blood pressure reductions of -18/14 mm Hg and -8/-9 mm Hg, respectively. In 64% of patients taking celiprolol and in 54% of those taking propranolol the prospective target reduction in supine diastolic blood pressure was achieved, namely a reduction to below 90 mm Hg or a reduction lower after propranolol than after celiprolol; celiprolol reduced the heart rate by an average of 6 bt/min and propranolol by 13 bt/min after 12 weeks treatment (p 0.01). Adverse reactions assessed by patient-volunteered information were similar in character and frequency for both drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 2427842     DOI: 10.1097/00005344-198608004-00029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Pharmacol        ISSN: 0160-2446            Impact factor:   3.105


  7 in total

Review 1.  The applied pharmacology of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (beta blockers) in relation to clinical outcomes.

Authors:  J D Fitzgerald
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.727

2.  Reliability of blood pressure determination with the Finapres with altered physiological states or pharmacodynamic conditions.

Authors:  D McAuley; B Silke; S Farrell
Journal:  Clin Auton Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.435

3.  Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of celiprolol and acebutolol.

Authors:  D Terziivanov; V Vlahov; N Belovezhdov; Z Gerova
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Celiprolol. An evaluation of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of hypertension and angina pectoris.

Authors:  C J Dunn; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  A risk-benefit assessment of celiprolol in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  M J Kendall; I Rajman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Celiprolol. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and its therapeutic use in hypertension and angina pectoris.

Authors:  J G Riddell; R G Shanks; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Effect of beta-blockade on exercise capacity in hypertensive subjects: a one-year double-blind study of celiprolol and metoprolol.

Authors:  G P Vyssoulis; M T Kouremetis; M A Valiouli; A P Michaelides; P K Toutouzas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.727

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.