| Literature DB >> 24278353 |
Euan S Harvey1, Mike Cappo, Gary A Kendrick, Dianne L McLean.
Abstract
Distributions of mobile animals have been shown to be heavily influenced by habitat and climate. We address the historical and contemporary context of fish habitats within a major zootone: the Recherche Archipelago, southern western Australia. Baited remote underwater video systems were set in nine habitat types within three regions to determine the species diversity and relative abundance of bony fishes, sharks and rays. Constrained ordinations and multivariate prediction and regression trees were used to examine the effects of gradients in longitude, depth, distance from islands and coast, and epibenthic habitat on fish assemblage composition. A total of 90 species from 43 families were recorded from a wide range of functional groups. Ordination accounted for 19% of the variation in the assemblage composition when constrained by spatial and epibenthic covariates, and identified redundancy in the use of distance from the nearest emergent island as a predictor. A spatial hierarchy of fourteen fish assemblages was identified using multivariate prediction and regression trees, with the primary split between assemblages on macroalgal reefs, and those on bare or sandy habitats supporting seagrass beds. The characterisation of indicator species for assemblages within the hierarchy revealed important faunal break in fish assemblages at 122.30 East at Cape Le Grand and subtle niche partitioning amongst species within the labrids and monacanthids. For example, some species of monacanthids were habitat specialists and predominantly found on seagrass (Acanthaluteres vittiger, Scobinichthys granulatus), reef (Meuschenia galii, Meuschenia hippocrepis) or sand habitats (Nelusetta ayraudi). Predatory fish that consume molluscs, crustaceans and cephalopods were dominant with evidence of habitat generalisation in reef species to cope with local disturbances by wave action. Niche separation within major genera, and a sub-regional faunal break, indicate future zootone mapping should recognise both cross-shelf and longshore environmental gradients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24278353 PMCID: PMC3838414 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080955
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1The western end of the Great Australian Bight (A), showing locations of 188 BRUVS sampling sites in the regions of Esperance (B), Duke of Orleans Bay (C) and Cape Arid (D).
Sampling sites are shaded by a summarisation of the nine habitat types into “sandy, sparse vegetation” (open symbols), “seagrass” (grey) and “algal reef” (black).
Figure 2Baited Remote Underwater Video Stations (BRUVS) used in stereo configuration (A) on complex seafloor topographies and single camera configuration on flat seabeds (B).
The BRUVS were deployed in fleets with marker buoys and hauling ropes to sample simultaneously (C).
Summaries of the relative abundance (ΣMaxN) and occurrence of 61 families of teleosts and elasmobranchs recorded by baited video in the Recherche Archipelago.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Heterodontiformes | Heterodontidae (1) | 8 (4) | 8 (<1) |
| Orectolobiformes | Parascylliidae (2) | 3 (2) | 3 (<1) |
| Carcharhiniformes | Sphyrnidae (1) | 2 (1) | 2 (<1) |
| Triakidae (3) | 29 (15) | 36 (1) | |
| Rajiformes | Rhinobatidae (1) | 14 (7) | 14 (<1) |
| Urolophidae (1) | 2 (1) | 2 (<1) | |
| Myliobatiformes | Dasyatidae (1) | 13 (7) | 14 (<1) |
| Myliobatidae (1) | 74 (39) | 87 (1) | |
| Clupeiformes | Clupeidae (1) | 1 (1) | 21 (<1) |
| Aulopiformes | Aulopidae (1) | 9 (5) | 10 (<1) |
| Beryciformes | Berycidae (2) | 20 (11) | 162 (3) |
| Scorpaeniformes | Neosebastidae (1) | 2 (1) | 2 (<1) |
| Platycephalidae (1) | 26 (14) | 52 (1) | |
| Perciformes | Arripidae (2) | 8 (4) | 23 (<1) |
| Callionymidae (1) | 2 (1) | 5 (<1) | |
| Carangidae (3) | 123 (65) | 1365 (22) | |
| Chaetodontidae (1) | 3 (2) | 4 (<1) | |
| Cheilodactylidae (3) | 67 (36) | 135 (2) | |
| Chironemidae (2) | 2 (1) | 2 (<1) | |
| Dinolestidae (1) | 20 (11) | 143 (2) | |
| Enoplosidae (1) | 2 (1) | 4 (<1) | |
| Gempylidae (1) | 2 (1) | 2 (<1) | |
| Gerreidae (1) | 78 (41) | 299 (5) | |
| Kyphosidae (3) | 37 (20) | 128 (2) | |
| Labridae (12) | 123 (65) | 1504 (24) | |
| Mullidae (1) | 66 (35) | 88 (1) | |
| Odacidae (3) | 25 (13) | 29 (<1) | |
| Oplegnathidae (1) | 2 (1) | 2 (<1) | |
| Pempherididae (2) | 12 (6) | 85 (1) | |
| Pentacerotidae (1) | 3 (2) | 3 (<1) | |
| Pinguipedidae (1) | 10 (5) | 13 (<1) | |
| Plesiopidae (1) | 1 (1) | 6 (<1) | |
| Pomacentridae (3) | 35 (19) | 526 (9) | |
| Scombridae (2) | 3 (2) | 14 (<1) | |
| Scorpididae (4) | 72 (38) | 320 (5) | |
| Serranidae (6) | 32 (17) | 75 (1) | |
| Sillaginidae (1) | 3 (2) | 44 (1) | |
| Sphyraenidae (1) | 14 (7) | 20 (<1) | |
| Terapontidae (1) | 9 (5) | 48 (1) | |
| Tetraodontiformes | Diodontidae (1) | 1 (1) | 1 (<1) |
| Monacanthidae (11) | 160 (85) | 865 (14) | |
| Ostraciidae (1) | 1 (1) | 1 (<1) | |
| Tetraodontidae (1) | 7 (4) | 7 (<1) |
Figure 3Summaries of (A) species richness by cumulative number of BRUVS sites, and (B) prevalence of 90 species at 188 BRUVS sites ranked in descending order of occurrence.
Figure 4Ordination of transformed species abundance (4th root MaxN) constrained by longitude, distance from the coast, depth (in blue), and habitat category (in red; a factor with nine levels, defined in the methods).
Symbols are scaled by species richness. Fitted site constraints are shaded as: Esperance (black), Duke of Orleans Bay (grey) and Cape Arid (open symbols). Only the top 15% of species eigenvectors are shown.
Details of all Dufrêne-Legendre Indices within each fish assemblage at all 14 nodes of the tree in Figure 5 are shown with the DLI in brackets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All (root node) | 188 | 3 |
| ||
| Inter-reef | 118 | 1 |
| ||
| Sandy, sparse epibenthos | 88 | 2 |
| ||
| Sandy, non-reef | 79 | 1 |
| ||
| Eastern, sandy, non-reef (sparse vegetation) | 56 | 3 |
| 1-17 (4.7 ± 3.1) | 2-77 (16.9 ± 16.3) |
| Western, sandy, non-reef (sparse vegetation) | 23 | 5 |
| 2-11 (5.8 ± 2.3) | 8-60 (25.5 ± 16.1) |
| Sandy reef (sparse vegetation, inundated with sand) | 9 | 5 |
| 6-17 (9.6 ± 3.2) | 9-49 (27.3 ± 12.3) |
| Seagrass | 30 | 3 |
| ||
| Deep seagrass | 8 | 3 |
| 4-10 (7 ± 2.1) | 15-52 (25.9 ± 11.7) |
| Shallow, western seagrass | 10 | 4 |
| 4-9 (7 ± 1.7) | 23-77 (46.6 ± 18.8) |
| Shallow, eastern seagrass | 12 | 8 |
| 3-19 (8.8 ± 4.8) | 5-149 (28.4 ± 39.5) |
| Algal Reef | 70 | 30 |
| ||
| Reef, “medium” cover of algal macrophytes | 28 | 10 |
| 5-25 (14.2 ± 5.2) | 13-125 (46.3 ± 25.5) |
| Reef, “dense” cover of algal macrophytes | 42 | 12 |
| 4-25 (14.3 ± 4.9) | 9-177 (49.6 ± 31.9) |
Summaries of mean, standard deviation and range of richness and abundance are given for the eight fish assemblages represented by terminal nodes in Figure 5. For a given species and a given group of sites, the DLI is defined as the product of the mean species abundance occurring in the group divided by the sum of the mean abundances in all other groups (specificity), times the proportion of sites within the group where the species occurs (fidelity), multiplied by 100. The higher the DLI value, the more ‘indicative’ the species is of a specific group of sites.
Figure 5Multivariate regression tree analysis of transformed (4th root MaxN) relative abundance of 90 species of fish constrained by the longitude of sampling sites, depth, and nine habitat categories.
Full details of node names and DLI are given in Table 2.
Figure 6Species-accumulation curves for the eight terminal nodes shown in Figure 5, and summarised here as three “sandy habitat” assemblages (A), three assemblages distinguished in “seagrass” habitats (B) and the two assemblages inhabiting “algal reefs” (D).