| Literature DB >> 24278170 |
Johan Ohlander1, Stella Maria Huber, Michael Schomaker, Christian Heumann, Rudolf Schierl, Bernhard Michalke, Oskar G Jenni, Jon Caflisch, Daniel Moraga Muñoz, Ondine S von Ehrenstein, Katja Radon.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Traditional gold mining is associated with mercury exposure. Especially vulnerable to its neurotoxic effects is the developing nervous system of a child. We aimed to investigate risk factors of mercury exposure among children in a rural mining town in Chile.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24278170 PMCID: PMC3835916 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079756
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Questionnaire Items.
| Outcome | Reference | Item |
| Demographic and biometricdata: | Estudio Internacional sobre la saludrespiratoria en escolares | sex, age, height, weight, number of siblings |
| Encuesta Mundial de SaludEscolar | birth year, marital state of parents | |
| Encuesta de exposición ambientala plomo en niños | housing situation | |
| Duration and intensity ofHg exposure: | Encuesta de exposición ambientala plomo en niños | Domestic circumstances: birthplace of the child, domiciles and frequency/time spent inside the house |
| Global Mercury Project – Environmental andHealth Assessment | Professional situation of the parents: profession, time of employment, Hg-contact of the mother during pregnancy, individuals in the household working with Hg | |
| Global Mercury Project – Environmental andHealth Assessment | Whereabouts of the child: time spent in school/most common playground (inside/outside the house) | |
| Predictors of Hgexposure: | Global Mercury Project – Environmental andHealth Assessment | fish consumption |
International Study on Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC).
Global School-based Student Health Survey (GSHS).
Questionnaire of environmental lead-exposure in children.
Questionnaire and fingernail sampling response among children of the two major public schools of the town.
| Test | Comment | Participation n (%) |
| Population: | total | 432 (100.0) |
| drop-outs | 14 (3.2) | |
| study population | 418 (96.8) | |
| Questionnaire: | handed-out | 418 (100.0) |
| returned | 338 (80.9) | |
| at least partially completed | 288 (68.9) | |
| Fingernail sampling: | 219 (52.4) |
Children who dropped out at various points in time because of relocation or absence for other reasons than health.
Pre and post imputation descriptives of all study variables.
| Variable | Pre imputation | Post imputation (N = 288) | NA | ||
| Mean (SD) | N (%) | Mean (SD) | N (%) | ||
| Age | 9.59 (1.93) | 9.59 (1.92) | 0 | ||
| Hg (µg/g) | 0.13 (0.11) | 0.13 (0.10) | 36.1 | ||
| Sex: | 0 | ||||
| Male | 156 (54.2) | 156 (54.2) | |||
| Female | 132 (45.8) | 132 (45.8) | |||
| Mother in contact withHg during pregnancy: | 12.5 | ||||
| No | 176 (69.8) | 197 (68.4) | |||
| Yes | 76 (30.2) | 91 (31.6) | |||
| Father’s occupation | 18.8 | ||||
| Industrial gold mine | 9 (3.8) | 19 (6.6) | |||
| Industrial copper mine | 42 (17.9) | 54 (18.9) | |||
| Traditional gold mining | 44 (18.8) | 55 (19.0) | |||
| Outside mining | 139 (59.4) | 160 (55.6) | |||
| Hg exposure in householdand child playing inside: | 17.7 | ||||
| No | 211 (89.0) | 253 (87.8) | |||
| Yes | 26 (11.0) | 35 (12.2) | |||
| Fish consumption: | 4.2 | ||||
| <1 times/week | 85 (30.8) | 89 (30.9) | |||
| 1–4 times/week | 131 (47.5) | 136 (47.2) | |||
| >4 times/week | 60 (21.74) | 63 (21.9) | |||
| Number of siblings | 5.9 | ||||
| 0 | 26 (9.6) | 29 (10.1) | |||
| 1–2 | 170 (62.7) | 176 (61.1) | |||
| >2 | 75 (27.7) | 83 (28.8) | |||
| Hours spent indoors | 22.2 | ||||
| <3 hours/day | 23 (10.3) | 33 (11.8) | |||
| 3–6 hours/day | 49 (21.9) | 67 (26.7) | |||
| >6 hours/day | 152 (67.8) | 189 (61.5) | |||
| Mother employed | 8.3 | ||||
| No | 191 (72.4) | 209 (72.6) | |||
| Yes | 73 (27.6) | 79 (27.4) | |||
| Father employed | 13.5 | ||||
| No | 23 (9.2) | 30 (10.4) | |||
| Yes | 226 (90.8) | 258 (89.6) | |||
| Somebody smoking in household | 10.1 | ||||
| No | 188 (72.6) | 209 (72.6) | |||
| Yes | 71 (27.4) | 79 (27.4) | |||
Descriptives for variables post imputation were calculated using Rubin’s rules.
NA = missing value. Column displays percentage of missing values in variable.
Variable additionally included in imputation model to improve missing at random assumption.
Main risk factors for mercury exposure above the 75th percentile (0.165 μg/g).
| Risk factor | Pre imputation | Post imputation | ||
| N (%) >75th Hg-percentile | Adjusted OR 95% CI | Unadjusted OR 95% CI | Adjusted OR 95% CI | |
| Sex: | ||||
| Male | 42 (26.9) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Female | 27 (20.5) | 0.46 (0.19–1.10) | 0.69 (0.37–1.28) | 0.60 (0.30–1.19) |
| Fish consumption: | ||||
| <1 times/week | 15 (16.9) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 1–4 times/week | 36 (26.5) | 0.96 (0.36–2.57) | 1.58 (0.76–3.29) | 1.57 (0.74–3.26) |
| >4 times/week | 18 (28.6) | 1.16 (0.34–4.01) | 0.79 (0.48–1.29) | 0.78 (0.46–1.32) |
| Father working in: | ||||
| Industrial gold mine | 5 (26.3) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Industrial copper mine | 10 (18.5) | 0.51 (0.07–3.92) | 0.58 (0.12–2.79) | 0.52 (0.10–2.58) |
| Traditional gold mining | 15 (27.3) | 0.80 (0.11–5.91) | 0.95 (0.22–4.20) | 0.78 (0.17–3.51) |
| Outside mining | 39 (24.4) | 0.71 (0.12–4.18) | 0.83 (0.19–3.71) | 0.82 (0.19–3.51) |
| Mother in contact with Hg during pregnancy: | ||||
| No | 43 (21.8) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 25 (27.7) | 1.10 (0.41–2.91) | 1.35 (0.62–2.94) | 1.03 (0.46–2.31) |
| Hg work in household and child playing inside: | ||||
| No | 52 (20.6) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 17 (48.5) | 4.91 (1.41–17.03) | 3.40 (1.28–9.07) | 3.49 (1.23–9.89) |
Descriptive data, pre imputation (adjusted) and post imputation (unadjusted and adjusted) logistic regression models with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). N = 288.
Pre imputation adjusted odds ratios (for all variables in table).
Post imputation unadjusted and adjusted (for all variables in table) odds ratios based on all seven imputed datasets combined.