Literature DB >> 24278061

Scleromyxedema: a rare disorder and its treatment difficulties.

Sandra Koleta Koronowska1, Agnieszka Osmola-Mańkowska, Oliwia Jakubowicz, Ryszard Zaba.   

Abstract

Scleromyxedema is a rare progressive cutaneous mucinosis, usually associated with a systemic involvement and paraproteinemia. Its aetiology remains unknown. The therapeutic options include numerous treatment modalities, however, no standard treatment exists as the rarity of this disease prevents the execution of controlled therapeutic trials. This paper reports a case of a 38-year-old male with progressive scleromyxedema associated with gammopathy. Initially, the patient was treated with prednisolone and later etretinate was added to the therapeutic schedule with quite good clinical improvement. However, after 6 months of treatment, several adverse effects were observed: hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridaemia and cataract of the right eye. The patient was consulted by dermatologists in Warsaw and Gdansk as well as by a haematologist. The patient was excluded from oncological treatment. Melphalan therapy was not recommended as it is associated with very toxic side effects. IVIG treatment (intravenous immunoglobulin) was not initiated because of financial issues. As the disease progressed, treatment with plasmapheresis was introduced. The patient received 4 cycles of the therapy. It was well-tolerated by the patient and gave satisfactory, but temporary results. In order to obtain long-lasting improvement the patient was treated with IVIG (21.0 g/dose for 5 consecutive days). This treatment modality seems to have resulted in a more stable improvement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  intravenous Immunoglobulin; plasmapheresis; scleromyxedema; treatment

Year:  2013        PMID: 24278061      PMCID: PMC3834678          DOI: 10.5114/pdia.2013.34165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol        ISSN: 1642-395X            Impact factor:   1.837


Introduction

Scleromyxedema (SM) is a rare progressive cutaneous mucinosis usually associated with a systemic involvement and paraproteinemia. It was first defined by Arndt and Gottron (1954) [1], then redefined by Rongioletti and Rebora (2001), as a disease characterised by a generalised papular and sclerodermoid eruption, monoclonal gammopathy (mostly Ig-λ paraproteinemia) and a triad of histological features: presence of mucin deposition within the upper and mid reticular dermis, fibroblast proliferation and fibrosis with the absence of a thyroid disorder [2] (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Diagnostic criteria of scleromyxedema

Diagnostic criteria of scleromyxedema Scleromyxedema is a severe disorder that may be fatal. It is characterised by an excessive deposition of mucin in the connective tissue [3]. The deposits may stimulate the synthesis of collagen and glycosaminoglycans [1]. As a result, lichenoid papules are formed which cause thickening and hardening of the tissue [4]. Scleromyxedema has a chronic, disabling course because it is often associated with a systemic involvement of internal organs. Scleromyxedema is thought to have three main clinicopathological subsets: local, generalised and atypical [3]. The generalised form is often referred to as the “generalised lichen myxedematosus”, and its course is much more severe than that of the other forms (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Chronic, potentially fatal course of scleromyxedema

Chronic, potentially fatal course of scleromyxedema The prevalence of SM is equal in men and women. No standard treatment exists as the rarity of the disease has prevented the execution of controlled therapeutic trials. Until 2009, only 150 cases of patients suffering from scleromyxoedema were reported [5]. The skin appears to be elephant-like and forms linear folds. The papules tend to group in the neck and forehead area. Histopathological examination reveals numerous mucin deposits in papules and sclerotic malformations, which consist of thickened collagen fibres. The mucin deposits are subtle in these lesions [1]. Numerous internal manifestations may occur in SM [6-8] (Table 1).
Table 1

Internal manifestations of scleromyxedema

Type of involvementManifestation
MuscularProximal myopathy, joint contractures, muscle weakness
NeurologicalEncephalopathy, peripheral neuropathy, coma
RheumatologicalJoint pain, migrating arthritis, sclerodactyly, seronegative polyarthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome
PulmonaryObstructive/restrictive lung disease, pulmonary hypertension
RenalRenal insufficiency
CardiovascularMyocardial infarction, hypertension, atherosclerosis
OphthalmologicalCorneal deposits, thinning of the eyelid, ectropion
Internal manifestations of scleromyxedema

Case report

We report a case of a 38-year-old man with a 1.5-year history of scleromyxedema typically associated with light chain λ IgG monoclonal gammopathy. He was first hospitalized in February 2011 due to severe pruritus of his feet and shanks, elbow, and carpal joint pain and sclerodactyly. Simultaneously erythema and small papules appeared on the skin of his face. Cutaneous examination revealed small, symmetric, disseminated papules (of 1 mm in diameter). Waxy and firm papules were localised mainly on both arms. The patient also presented excessive and diffuse thickening of the skin on the face, especially surrounding the lips, which later led to facial expression impairment. Radiological and ultrasonographic examinations were also performed to exclude any systemic involvement of the disease (chest X-ray, USG of abdomen). In laboratory investigation complete blood count was normal. Serum analysis indicated hyperproteinemia: IgG monoclonal gammopathy with λ light chains were present. Bence-Jones protein was detected, however, further investigations excluded haematological disorders. Urine analysis was normal. Based on clinical manifestations, and histopathological and laboratory data, the diagnosis of scleromyxoedema with associated IgG-λ was obtained. As scleromyxedema leads to systemic involvement, the patient was consulted by several specialists: a haematologist, cardiologist, neurologist, ophthalmologist, internal medicine doctor and several dermatologists. The haematologist disqualified the patient from treatment with melphalan. Therapy before hospitalisation included oral prednisolone, oral antihistaminic drugs and topical steroids but remained ineffective. Treatment was started with hydrocortisone i.v. 2 × 200 mg/3 consecutive days, afterwards 1 × 200 mg/6 days, which resulted in a slight improvement – erythema started to fade. After a relapse of the disease several weeks later, we introduced a combination of oral acitretin 75 mg daily and methylprednisolone: 2 doses in an alternating manner 48 mg or 32 mg daily were administered. This stopped the progression of the disease. However, as a result of steroid and retinoid administration, the patient presented hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridaemia and mere hyperglycaemia. This is why the doses were lowered to: acitretin 50 mg daily, methylprednisolone 16/8 mg and later 16/24 mg, but this led to another relapse of clinical symptoms. Then, plasmapheresis was started. The patient received a total of 4 cycles of plasmapheresis. Each cycle consisted of 4-5 procedures of plasmapheresis. Every course resulted in short-term clinical improvement – cutaneous manifestation each time became less severe. In order to attempt to achieve remission, IVIG treatment was started (Figures 3 and 4).
Figure 3

Different treatment modalities used in the therapy of our patient with scleromyxedema

Figure 4 A-D

Clinical appearance directly prior to initiation of IVIG and after 3 cycles of IVIG – skin thickness deceased, papules became less visible

Different treatment modalities used in the therapy of our patient with scleromyxedema Clinical appearance directly prior to initiation of IVIG and after 3 cycles of IVIG – skin thickness deceased, papules became less visible Treatment modalities of scleromyxedema

Discussion

Causal treatment of scleromyxedema is unavailable, as the aetiology is still unclear [9]. The severe course of the disease requires very aggressive treatment and long-term maintenance therapy is necessary in most cases [7]. According to the literature, a successful therapy with relatively long-term effects and few side effects involves the use of IVIG [28, 29]. It is considered to be the best therapeutic option as it is associated with relatively few side effects [27]. Plasmapheresis remains effective only in a short-time perspective and leads to relapses. For this reason we started IVIG treatment. We received a relatively good and longer lasting response to this treatment modality: the papules and generalised sclerodermoid eruption became less visible. The progression of the disease was stopped. However, from a financial aspect, this treatment modality may be challenging. The chronic course of this disease affects the patient mentally, thus psychological or psychiatric therapy may also be introduced in order to improve the results of systemic treatment.
Table 2

Treatment modalities of scleromyxedema

Treatment modalityReferences
Systemic corticosteroids [10]
Cyclophosphamide [11, 12]
Melphalan [15]
Interferon α [16]
Cyclosporine A [17, 18]
Plasmapheresis [19, 20]
Methotrexate [21]
Chlorambucil joined with PUVA [22]
Surgical intervention [23]
2-chlordeoxyadenosine [24]
Retinoids [25]
Mucopolysaccharides (thiomucase) [26]
Thalidomide [7, 14]
Immunoglobulins [6, 2730]
Autologous stem cell transplantation [13, 31, 32]
Biological treatment – bortezomib [13, 14]
  28 in total

1.  Scleromyxoedema: clinical follow-up after successful treatment with high-dose immunoglobulins reveals different long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Mona Bidier; Carolin Zschoche; Patrick Gholam; Alexander H Enk; Eva N Hadaschik
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.437

2.  Treatment of scleromyxedema with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine.

Authors:  L S Davis; S Sanal; O P Sangueza
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.527

Review 3.  [Arndt-Gottron scleromyxedema. Case report and review of therapeutic possibilities].

Authors:  C G Schirren; M Betke; F Eckert; B Przybilla
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 0.751

4.  Successful treatment of scleromyxedema with dexamethasone cyclophosphamide pulse therapy.

Authors:  C M Kuldeep; A K Mittal; L K Gupta; V K Paliwal; P Sharma; A Garg
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.545

5.  Surgical treatment of facial disfigurement due to lichen myxedematosus.

Authors:  Cengiz Acikel; Huseyin Karagoz; Zafer Kucukodaci
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 3.398

6.  Generalized papular and sclerodermoid eruption: scleromyxedema.

Authors:  Zehra Asiran Serdar; Ilknur Kivanc Altunay; Sirin Pekcan Yasar; Gamze Türker Erfan; Pembegül Gunes
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Suspected cardiac toxicity to intravenous immunoglobulin used for treatment of scleromyxedema.

Authors:  M P Binitha; G Nandakumar; Daisy Thomas
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.545

8.  Scleromyxedema: therapeutic response to isotretinoin in three patients.

Authors:  C P Milam; L E Cohen; N A Fenske; N S Ling
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.527

9.  Scleromyxedema: a complete response to prednisone.

Authors:  D Rayson; J A Lust; A Duncan; W P Su
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Scleromyxedema.

Authors:  A M Dinneen; C H Dicken
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.527

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Case of Autoimmune Polyglandular Syndrome .ype 2 Associated with Atypical Form of Scleromyxedema.

Authors:  Oleksander Prylutskyi; Olga Prylutska; Anatoliy Degonskyi; Kseniia Tkachenko
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2016-09

2.  Characterization of circulating myeloma tumor cells by next generation flowcytometry in scleromyxedema patient: a case report.

Authors:  Ruba Y Taha; Saba Hasan; Firyal Ibrahim; Yannick Chantran; Hesham El Sabah; Siveen Sivaraman; Issam Al Bozom; Ahmad Al Sabbagh; Laurent Garderet; Halima El Omri
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.