Literature DB >> 24277678

Cardiovascular and mortality risk in elderly Medicare beneficiaries treated with olmesartan versus other angiotensin receptor blockers.

David J Graham1, Esther H Zhou, Stephen McKean, Mark Levenson, Katlyn Calia, Kate Gelperin, Xiao Ding, Thomas E MaCurdy, Chris Worrall, Jeffrey A Kelman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the randomized trial, Randomized Olmesartan and Diabetes Microalbuminuria Prevention, acute cardiovascular death was increased nearly fivefold in diabetic patients treated with high-dose olmesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), compared with placebo.
METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries were entered into new-user cohorts of olmesartan or other ARBs and followed on therapy for occurrence of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or death. Analyses focused on specific subgroups defined by diabetes status, ARB dose, and duration of therapy. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression, with other ARBs as reference.
RESULTS: A total of 158,054 olmesartan and 724,673 other ARB users were followed for 54,285 and 260,390 person-years, respectively, during which 9237 endpoint events occurred. Lower-dose olmesartan was not associated with increased risk for any endpoint, regardless of duration of use. High-dose olmesartan for 6 months or longer was associated with increased risk of death in patients with diabetes (HR 2.03, 95%CI 1.09-3.75, p = 0.02) and with reduced risk in nondiabetic patients (HR 0.46, 95%CI 0.24-0.86, p = 0.01). Some, but not all, sensitivity analyses suggested that selective prescribing of olmesartan to healthier patients (channeling bias) may have accounted for the reduced risk in nondiabetic patients.
CONCLUSIONS: High-dose olmesartan was associated with an increased risk of death in diabetic patients treated for 6 months or longer and with a reduced risk of death in nondiabetic patients, when compared with use of other ARBs. This latter effect was probably because of selective prescribing of olmesartan to healthier patients, although effect modification cannot be excluded. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs); cardiovascular; mortality; olmesartan; pharmacoepidemiology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24277678     DOI: 10.1002/pds.3548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  6 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines in US residents aged 65 years and older from 2012 to 2013 using Medicare data: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Hector S Izurieta; Nicole Thadani; David K Shay; Yun Lu; Aaron Maurer; Ivo M Foppa; Riley Franks; Douglas Pratt; Richard A Forshee; Thomas MaCurdy; Chris Worrall; Andrew E Howery; Jeffrey Kelman
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 25.071

2.  The challenges of comparing results between placebo controlled randomized trials and non-experimental new user, active comparator cohort studies: the example of olmesartan.

Authors:  Wendy Camelo Castillo; Joseph A C Delaney; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Study of Cardiovascular Health Outcomes in the Era of Claims Data: The Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  Bruce M Psaty; Joseph A Delaney; Alice M Arnold; Lesley H Curtis; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Susan R Heckbert; Barbara McKnight; Diane Ives; John S Gottdiener; Lewis H Kuller; W T Longstreth
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  [Three cases of severe chronic diarrhea with a rare cause and a simple therapy].

Authors:  K-P Rommel; E Schneider; I Witschel; U Halm; M Zachäus
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Linear mixed-effects model of QTc prolongation for olmesartan medoxomil.

Authors:  SaeHeum Song; Nobuko Matsushima; James Lee; Jeanne Mendell
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.126

6.  A thorough QTc study demonstrates that olmesartan medoxomil does not prolong the QTc interval.

Authors:  Jeanne Mendell; Nobuko Matsushima; Terry E O'Reilly; James Lee
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.126

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.