Shariq A Khan1, David L McDonagh, Owoicho Adogwa, Sankalp Gokhale, Ulysses N Toche, Terence Verla, Ali R Zomorodi, Gavin W Britz. 1. *Department of Anesthesiology; §Departments of Surgery (Neurosurgery) and Radiology, and ¶Division of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; ‡Department of Anesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; ‖Duke University Medical School, Durham, North Carolina; #Department of Neurosurgery, Methodist Neurological Institute, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adenosine-induced flow arrest is a technique used to assist in the surgical clipping of complex aneurysms. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety associated with adenosine-assisted intracranial aneurysm surgery. METHODS: Medical records of all patients presenting between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012, for intracranial aneurysm surgery were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the intraoperative administration of adenosine: the nonadenosine group (n = 262) and the adenosine group (n = 64). The primary outcome compared between groups included a composite of 30-day mortality and incidences of perioperative cardiac complications (perioperative myocardial infarction or perioperative cardiac arrhythmias). RESULTS: The study groups were statistically similar except for a difference in the size and location of cerebral aneurysms and the incidence of coronary artery disease. The primary composite outcome occurred in 4.6% and 9.4% of patients in the nonadenosine and adenosine groups, respectively (P = .13). After adjustment for differences in the incidence of coronary artery disease between the 2 groups, the odds of the primary outcome were not significantly different between the groups (adjusted odds ratio = 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-5.93; P = .15). There were also no significant differences in the durations of hospital and intensive care unit stay between the study groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that adenosine-assisted intracranial aneurysm surgery is not associated with an increase in perioperative cardiac complications or mortality in patients with low risk of coronary artery disease and may be considered a safe technique to assist clipping of complex aneurysms.
BACKGROUND:Adenosine-induced flow arrest is a technique used to assist in the surgical clipping of complex aneurysms. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety associated with adenosine-assisted intracranial aneurysm surgery. METHODS: Medical records of all patients presenting between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012, for intracranial aneurysm surgery were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the intraoperative administration of adenosine: the nonadenosine group (n = 262) and the adenosine group (n = 64). The primary outcome compared between groups included a composite of 30-day mortality and incidences of perioperative cardiac complications (perioperative myocardial infarction or perioperative cardiac arrhythmias). RESULTS: The study groups were statistically similar except for a difference in the size and location of cerebral aneurysms and the incidence of coronary artery disease. The primary composite outcome occurred in 4.6% and 9.4% of patients in the nonadenosine and adenosine groups, respectively (P = .13). After adjustment for differences in the incidence of coronary artery disease between the 2 groups, the odds of the primary outcome were not significantly different between the groups (adjusted odds ratio = 2.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-5.93; P = .15). There were also no significant differences in the durations of hospital and intensive care unit stay between the study groups. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that adenosine-assisted intracranial aneurysm surgery is not associated with an increase in perioperative cardiac complications or mortality in patients with low risk of coronary artery disease and may be considered a safe technique to assist clipping of complex aneurysms.
Authors: Torstein R Meling; Luis Romundstad; Geir Niemi; Jon Narum; Per Kristian Eide; Angelika G Sorteberg; Wilhelm A Sorteberg Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Keng Siang Lee; John J Y Zhang; Vincent Nguyen; Julian Han; Jeremiah N Johnson; Ramez Kirollos; Mario Teo Journal: Neurosurg Rev Date: 2021-04-23 Impact factor: 2.800