Literature DB >> 24276295

Long-term effect of whole body vibration training on jump height: meta-analysis.

Nuttaset Manimmanakorn1, Michael J Hamlin, Jenny J Ross, Apiwan Manimmanakorn.   

Abstract

Whole body vibration (WBV) is widely promoted as a means of improving muscle strength, but the evidence of a performance benefit is unclear with some reporting improvements and others finding none. The objective of this study was to analyze the current evidence for the effectiveness of WBV on jump height. We included randomized controlled trials or matched design studies comparing the effect of WBV training on countermovement and squat jump (SJ) height, which were gathered from MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, Sciencedirect, Proquest, Scopus, Google Scholar, and SPORTDiscus databases. The overall effect of WBV training (from the 15 studies included) compared with having no additional exercise on countermovement jump height yielded a positive standardized mean difference of 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.55-0.99). The effect of WBV training on SJ height was 0.68 (0.08-1.11). Vibration exercise consisting of a higher frequency (>30 Hz, 0.86, 0.62-1.10), higher amplitude (>3 mm, 0.84, 0.52-1.17), longer exposure duration (>10 minutes per session, 0.92, 0.48-1.36), longer training period (>12 weeks, 0.87, 0.56-1.19) and among nonathletes (0.96, 0.63-1.30) had greater benefit for jump height improvement than a lower frequency (≤ 30 Hz, 0.56, 0.13-0.99), lower amplitude (≤ 3 mm, 0.66, 0.35-0.98), shorter exposure duration (≤ 10 minutes per session, 0.68, 0.45-0.92), intermediate training period (4-12 weeks, 0.72, 0.35-1.09), shorter training period (<4 weeks, 0.58, -0.08 to -1.23) and in athletes (0.59, 0.31-0.88). The effect of WBV training compared with a standard cardiovascular-type exercise group from 4 studies was 0.63 (0.10-1.15). In conclusion, WBV training produces a moderate-to-large effect on jump height. Vibration training protocols with higher frequencies, higher amplitudes, longer exposures per session, and longer training periods are more likely to enhance muscle power.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24276295     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  The adaptations in muscle architecture following whole body vibration training.

Authors:  Eylem Celik; Gulin Findikoglu; Sevgi Ozdemir Kart; Nuray Akkaya; Hayri Ertan
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 1.864

Review 2.  Small and inconsistent effects of whole body vibration on athletic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Melanie Lesinski; Miguel Fernandez-Del-Olmo; Urs Granacher
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of whole body vibration on strength and jumping performance in volleyball and beach volleyball players.

Authors:  J A Pérez-Turpin; P Zmijewski; J M Jimenez-Olmedo; M A Jové-Tossi; A Martínez-Carbonell; C Suárez-Llorca; E Andreu-Cabrera
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.806

4.  Sex-specific response to whole-body vibration training: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Manfred Hartard; Aaron Seiler; Peter Spitzenpfeil; Linus Engel; Diana Hartard; Mohamed Amine Fenneni; Helmi Ben Saad
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.806

5.  The acute effects of whole body vibration stimulus warm-up on skill-related physical capabilities in volleyball players.

Authors:  Chung-Cheng Wu; Min-Hsien Wang; Chi-Yao Chang; Min-Hao Hung; Hsin-Huan Wang; Ke-Chou Chen; Tzong-Rong Ger; Kuo-Chuan Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.