Galit Weinstein1, Alexa S Beiser2, Seung Hoan Choi3, Sarah R Preis4, Tai C Chen5, Demetrios Vorgas5, Rhoda Au1, Aleksandra Pikula1, Philip A Wolf1, Anita L DeStefano2, Ramachandran S Vasan1, Sudha Seshadri1. 1. Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts2The Framingham Heart Study, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts2The Framingham Heart Study, Boston, Massachusetts3Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts3Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: In animal studies, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has been shown to impact neuronal survival and function and improve synaptic plasticity and long-term memory. Circulating BDNF levels increase with physical activity and caloric restriction, thus BDNF may mediate some of the observed associations between lifestyle and the risk for dementia. Some prior studies showed lower circulating BDNF in persons with Alzheimer disease (AD) compared with control participants; however, it remains uncertain whether reduced levels precede dementia onset. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether higher serum BDNF levels in cognitively healthy adults protect against the future risk for dementia and AD and to identify potential modifiers of this association. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Framingham Study original and offspring participants were followed up from 1992 and 1998, respectively, for up to 10 years. We used Cox models to relate BDNF levels to the risk for dementia and AD and adjusted for potential confounders. We also ran sensitivity analyses stratified by sex, age, and education, as well as related BDNF genetic variants to AD risk. This community-based, prospective cohort study involved 2131 dementia-free participants aged 60 years and older (mean [SD] age, 72 [7] years; 56% women). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ten-year incidence of dementia and AD. RESULTS: During follow-up, 140 participants developed dementia, 117 of whom had AD. Controlling for age and sex, each standard-deviation increment in BDNF was associated with a 33% lower risk for dementia and AD (P = .006 and P = .01, respectively) and these associations persisted after additional adjustments. Compared with the bottom quintile, BDNF levels in the top quintile were associated with less than half the risk for dementia and AD (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.85; P = .01; and hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.86; P = .02, respectively). These associations were apparent only among women, persons aged 80 years and older, and those with college degrees (hazard ratios for AD: 0.65, [95% CI, 0.50-0.85], P = .001; 0.63 [95% CI, 0.47-0.85], P = .002; and 0.27 [95% CI, 0.11-0.65], P = .003, respectively). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor genetic variants were not associated with AD risk. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Higher serum BDNF levels may protect against future occurrence of dementia and AD. Our findings suggest a role for BDNF in the biology and possibly in the prevention of dementia and AD, especially in select subgroups of women and older and more highly educated persons.
IMPORTANCE: In animal studies, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has been shown to impact neuronal survival and function and improve synaptic plasticity and long-term memory. Circulating BDNF levels increase with physical activity and caloric restriction, thus BDNF may mediate some of the observed associations between lifestyle and the risk for dementia. Some prior studies showed lower circulating BDNF in persons with Alzheimer disease (AD) compared with control participants; however, it remains uncertain whether reduced levels precede dementia onset. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether higher serum BDNF levels in cognitively healthy adults protect against the future risk for dementia and AD and to identify potential modifiers of this association. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Framingham Study original and offspring participants were followed up from 1992 and 1998, respectively, for up to 10 years. We used Cox models to relate BDNF levels to the risk for dementia and AD and adjusted for potential confounders. We also ran sensitivity analyses stratified by sex, age, and education, as well as related BDNF genetic variants to AD risk. This community-based, prospective cohort study involved 2131 dementia-freeparticipants aged 60 years and older (mean [SD] age, 72 [7] years; 56% women). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ten-year incidence of dementia and AD. RESULTS: During follow-up, 140 participants developed dementia, 117 of whom had AD. Controlling for age and sex, each standard-deviation increment in BDNF was associated with a 33% lower risk for dementia and AD (P = .006 and P = .01, respectively) and these associations persisted after additional adjustments. Compared with the bottom quintile, BDNF levels in the top quintile were associated with less than half the risk for dementia and AD (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.28-0.85; P = .01; and hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.24-0.86; P = .02, respectively). These associations were apparent only among women, persons aged 80 years and older, and those with college degrees (hazard ratios for AD: 0.65, [95% CI, 0.50-0.85], P = .001; 0.63 [95% CI, 0.47-0.85], P = .002; and 0.27 [95% CI, 0.11-0.65], P = .003, respectively). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor genetic variants were not associated with AD risk. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Higher serum BDNF levels may protect against future occurrence of dementia and AD. Our findings suggest a role for BDNF in the biology and possibly in the prevention of dementia and AD, especially in select subgroups of women and older and more highly educated persons.
Authors: Cleusa P Ferri; Martin Prince; Carol Brayne; Henry Brodaty; Laura Fratiglioni; Mary Ganguli; Kathleen Hall; Kazuo Hasegawa; Hugh Hendrie; Yueqin Huang; Anthony Jorm; Colin Mathers; Paulo R Menezes; Elizabeth Rimmer; Marcia Scazufca Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-12-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J A Kaye; T Swihart; D Howieson; A Dame; M M Moore; T Karnos; R Camicioli; M Ball; B Oken; G Sexton Journal: Neurology Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Alexa S Beiser; Jacob Selhub; Rhoda Au; Paul F Jacques; Mitsuhiro Yoshita; Irwin H Rosenberg; Ralph B D'Agostino; Charles DeCarli Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2008-05
Authors: Brian W Kunkle; James Jaworski; Sandra Barral; Badri Vardarajan; Gary W Beecham; Eden R Martin; Laura S Cantwell; Amanda Partch; Thomas D Bird; Wendy H Raskind; Anita L DeStefano; Regina M Carney; Michael Cuccaro; Jeffrey M Vance; Lindsay A Farrer; Alison M Goate; Tatiana Foroud; Richard P Mayeux; Gerard D Schellenberg; Jonathan L Haines; Margaret A Pericak-Vance Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2015-09-11 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Joshua Matyi; JoAnn T Tschanz; Gail B Rattinger; Chelsea Sanders; Elizabeth K Vernon; Chris Corcoran; John S K Kauwe; Mona Buhusi Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Vincent Chouraki; Sarah R Preis; Qiong Yang; Alexa Beiser; Shuo Li; Martin G Larson; Galit Weinstein; Thomas J Wang; Robert E Gerszten; Ramachandran S Vasan; Sudha Seshadri Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Bo Yi Kim; Seon Heui Lee; Petra L Graham; Francesco Angelucci; Alejandro Lucia; Helios Pareja-Galeano; Thomas Leyhe; Yuda Turana; I Re Lee; Ji Hye Yoon; Jae Il Shin Journal: Mol Neurobiol Date: 2016-11-04 Impact factor: 5.590
Authors: Janice M Diaz-Otero; Ting-Chieh Yen; Courtney Fisher; Daniel Bota; William F Jackson; Anne M Dorrance Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 4.733