Literature DB >> 24276100

Can the characteristics of emergency department attendances predict poor hospital outcomes in patients with sepsis?

Irwani Ibrahim1, Ian G Jacobs.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The emergency department (ED) is often the initial site of identification of patients with sepsis. We aimed to determine the characteristics of ED attendances that predict poor hospital outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients in eight metropolitan EDs in Perth, Western Australia, from 2001 to 2006. Patients diagnosed with sepsis in the ED were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision-Australian Modification code in the Emergency Department Information System (EDIS) database. The EDIS database was subsequently linked to mortality and hospital morbidity records. The following characteristics were examined: triage category, mode of arrival, source of referral and hospital of presentation. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of hospital mortality, prolonged length of stay, and admission to the intensive care unit (ICU).
RESULTS: In the 1,311 patients diagnosed with sepsis in the ED, the hospital mortality and ICU admission rates were 19.5% and 18.5%, respectively. The mean hospital length of stay was 12 ± 15 days. Acute triage categories predicted both hospital mortality and ICU admissions, while mode of arrival by ambulance was a predictor of all poor hospital outcomes (p < 0.001). Patients who presented to non-teaching hospitals had similar hospital outcomes as patients who presented to teaching hospitals. The source of referrals was not a predictor of poor hospital outcomes (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Mode of arrival and triage score, which are characteristics unique to the ED, may predict poor hospital outcomes in patients with sepsis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24276100     DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2013224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  6 in total

Review 1.  Identification of adults with sepsis in the prehospital environment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael A Smyth; Samantha J Brace-McDonnell; Gavin D Perkins
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Dispatch and prehospital transport for acute septic patients: an observational study.

Authors:  Peter Bank Pedersen; Daniel Pilsgaard Henriksen; Søren Mikkelsen; Annmarie Touborg Lassen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Derivation and internal validation of the screening to enhance prehospital identification of sepsis (SEPSIS) score in adults on arrival at the emergency department.

Authors:  Michael A Smyth; Daniel Gallacher; Peter K Kimani; Mark Ragoo; Matthew Ward; Gavin D Perkins
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Impact of Prehospital Care on Outcomes in Sepsis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Michael A Smyth; Samantha J Brace-McDonnell; Gavin D Perkins
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2016-07-05

5.  Comparing the effectiveness of three scoring systems in predicting adult patient outcomes in the emergency department.

Authors:  Xiaojun Wei; Haoli Ma; Ruining Liu; Yan Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Construct validity of acute morbidity as a novel outcome for emergency patients.

Authors:  Fabrizia Schmid; Alexandra Malinovska; Karin Weigel; Tito Bosia; Christian H Nickel; Roland Bingisser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.