Literature DB >> 24275687

Interventional cardiology: biodegradable-polymer DES versus second-generation durable-polymer DES.

Bryony M Mearns.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24275687     DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol        ISSN: 1759-5002            Impact factor:   32.419


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical outcomes with bioabsorbable polymer- versus durable polymer-based drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tullio Palmerini; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Diego Della Riva; Andrea Mariani; Manel Sabaté; Pieter C Smits; Christoph Kaiser; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Giacomo Frati; Massimo Mancone; Philippe Genereux; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Safety and efficacy outcomes of first and second generation durable polymer drug eluting stents and biodegradable polymer biolimus eluting stents in clinical practice: comprehensive network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eliano P Navarese; Kenneth Tandjung; Bimmer Claessen; Felicita Andreotti; Mariusz Kowalewski; David E Kandzari; Dean J Kereiakes; Ron Waksman; Laura Mauri; Ian T Meredith; Aloke V Finn; Hyo-Soo Kim; Jacek Kubica; Harry Suryapranata; Toni Mustahsani Aprami; Giuseppe Di Pasquale; Clemens von Birgelen; Elvin Kedhi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-11-06

3.  Bare metal stents, durable polymer drug eluting stents, and biodegradable polymer drug eluting stents for coronary artery disease: mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Bora Toklu; Nicholas Amoroso; Mario Fusaro; Sunil Kumar; Edward L Hannan; David P Faxon; Frederick Feit
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-11-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.