Literature DB >> 24275511

Acquiring procedural skills in ICUs: a prospective multicenter study*.

Damien Roux1, Jean Reignier, Guillaume Thiery, Alexandre Boyer, Jan Hayon, Bertrand Souweine, Laurent Papazian, Alain Mercat, Gilles Bernardin, Alain Combes, Jean-Daniel Chiche, Jean-Luc Diehl, Damien du Cheyron, Erwan L'her, Dominique Perrotin, Francis Schneider, Marie Thuong, Michel Wolff, Fabrice Zeni, Didier Dreyfuss, Jean-Damien Ricard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Providing appropriate training of procedural skills to residents while ensuring patient safety through trainee supervision is a difficult and constant challenge. We sought to determine how effective and safe procedural skill acquisition is in French ICUs and to identify failure and complication risk factors.
DESIGN: Multicenter prospective observational study. Invasive procedures performed by residents were recorded during two consecutive semesters.
SETTING: Eighty-four residents.
SUBJECTS: Eighty-four residents. INTERVENTION: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Number of invasive procedures performed, failure and complication rates, supervision, and assistance provided. Five thousand six hundred seventeen procedures were prospectively studied: 1,007 tracheal intubations, 1,272 arterial and 2,586 central venous catheter insertions, 457 fiberoptic bronchoscopies, and 295 chest tube insertions. During the semesters, residents performed a median of 10 intubations, 14 arterial catheter insertions, and 26 central venous catheter insertions. Complication rates were low, similar to those in the literature: 8.6% desaturation and 7.4% esophageal placement during intubation; 0.4% and 2.3% pneumothorax with jugular and subclavian central venous catheter insertions, respectively. We identified risk factors for failure and complications. Higher rates of failure and complications for intubation were associated with residents with no or little previous experience (p < 0.001); failure of internal jugular vein catheterization was associated with left-side insertion (p = 0.005) and absence of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.007). Supervision and assistance were more frequent at the beginning of the semester and for intubation and chest tube insertion. Finally, residents had less access to fiberoptic bronchoscopy and chest tube insertion.
CONCLUSION: Procedural skills acquisition by residents in the ICU appears feasible and safe with complication rates comparable to what has previously been reported. We identified specific procedures and situations associated with higher failure and complication rates that could require proactive training. Questions still remain regarding minimal numbers of procedures to attain competence and how best to provide procedural training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24275511     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  8 in total

1.  Apnoeic oxygenation via high-flow nasal cannula oxygen combined with non-invasive ventilation preoxygenation for intubation in hypoxaemic patients in the intensive care unit: the single-centre, blinded, randomised controlled OPTINIV trial.

Authors:  Samir Jaber; Marion Monnin; Mehdi Girard; Matthieu Conseil; Moussa Cisse; Julie Carr; Martin Mahul; Jean Marc Delay; Fouad Belafia; Gérald Chanques; Nicolas Molinari; Audrey De Jong
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael C Sklar; Francois Beloncle; Christina M Katsios; Laurent Brochard; Jan O Friedrich
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  The practice of intensive care in Latin America: a survey of academic intensivists.

Authors:  Ricardo Castro; Nicolas Nin; Fernando Ríos; Leyla Alegría; Elisa Estenssoro; Gastón Murias; Gilberto Friedman; Manuel Jibaja; Gustavo Ospina-Tascon; Javier Hurtado; María Del Carmen Marín; Flavia R Machado; Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti; Arnaldo Dubin; Luciano Azevedo; Maurizio Cecconi; Jan Bakker; Glenn Hernandez
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Effect of endotracheal tube plus stylet versus endotracheal tube alone on successful first-attempt tracheal intubation among critically ill patients: the multicentre randomised STYLETO study protocol.

Authors:  Samir Jaber; Amélie Rolle; Boris Jung; Gerald Chanques; Helena Bertet; David Galeazzi; Claire Chauveton; Nicolas Molinari; Audrey De Jong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Variation in Intensive Care Unit Intubation Practices in Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine Fellowship.

Authors:  Anna K Brady; Wade Brown; Joshua L Denson; Gretchen Winter; Abesh Niroula; Lekshmi Santhosh; W Graham Carlos
Journal:  ATS Sch       Date:  2020-10-21

Review 6.  How to improve intubation in the intensive care unit. Update on knowledge and devices.

Authors:  Audrey De Jong; Sheila Nainan Myatra; Oriol Roca; Samir Jaber
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 41.787

7.  Risk Factors for and Prediction of Hypoxemia during Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.

Authors:  Andrew C McKown; Jonathan D Casey; Derek W Russell; Aaron M Joffe; David R Janz; Todd W Rice; Matthew W Semler
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2018-11

8.  McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in intensive care patients: the randomised multicentre MACMAN trial study protocol.

Authors:  Arthur Bailly; Jean Baptiste Lascarrou; Aurelie Le Thuaut; Julie Boisrame-Helms; Toufik Kamel; Emmanuelle Mercier; Jean Damien Ricard; Virginie Lemiale; Benoit Champigneulle; Jean Reignier
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.