Gloria O'Connor1, Vivien Coates2, Siobhan O'Neill3. 1. Macmillan Colorectal Cancer Nurse Specialist, Altnagelvin Hospital, Londonderry, Northern Ireland BT47 6SB, UK. Electronic address: gloriaoconnor@yahoo.co.uk. 2. School of Nursing, University of Ulster, Coleraine BT52 1SA, UK. Electronic address: ve.coates@ulster.ac.uk. 3. School of Psychology, University of Ulster, Magee Campus, Londonderry BT48 7JL, UK. Electronic address: sm.oneill@ulster.ac.uk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of a tailored information package for rectal cancer patients on satisfaction with information, anxiety and depression and readjustment. METHOD: The study used a randomised control trial method. Seventy six patients undergoing surgery and treatment for rectal cancer were randomly assigned to an intervention (n = 43) or control group (n = 33). The intervention group received an information pack tailored according to their treatment plan and preferred information. The control group received the information currently given to these patients. Satisfaction with information was measured using the Patient Satisfaction with Cancer Treatment Education (PSCaTE) scale, anxiety and depression were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and readjustment was measured using the Reintegration to Normal Living Index, at three time points. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between the intervention and control group on pre and post intervention scores with patients in the intervention group expressing a higher level of satisfaction with information than those in the control group at Times 2 and 3 (p = 0.00 for both). The intervention group also had a significantly lower anxiety score than the control group at Time 3 (p = 0.03). There was no difference between depression and readjustment scores in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The results support the hypothesis that a tailored information pack for patients with rectal cancer will positively affect satisfaction with information. These results will enhance the knowledge base surrounding the provision of tailored information to specific patient groups.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of a tailored information package for rectal cancer patients on satisfaction with information, anxiety and depression and readjustment. METHOD: The study used a randomised control trial method. Seventy six patients undergoing surgery and treatment for rectal cancer were randomly assigned to an intervention (n = 43) or control group (n = 33). The intervention group received an information pack tailored according to their treatment plan and preferred information. The control group received the information currently given to these patients. Satisfaction with information was measured using the Patient Satisfaction with Cancer Treatment Education (PSCaTE) scale, anxiety and depression were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and readjustment was measured using the Reintegration to Normal Living Index, at three time points. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between the intervention and control group on pre and post intervention scores with patients in the intervention group expressing a higher level of satisfaction with information than those in the control group at Times 2 and 3 (p = 0.00 for both). The intervention group also had a significantly lower anxiety score than the control group at Time 3 (p = 0.03). There was no difference between depression and readjustment scores in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The results support the hypothesis that a tailored information pack for patients with rectal cancer will positively affect satisfaction with information. These results will enhance the knowledge base surrounding the provision of tailored information to specific patient groups.
Authors: Masoumeh Pourfallahi; Mohammad Gholami; Mohammad Javad Tarrahi; Tahereh Toulabi; Parastou Kordestani Moghadam Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Catherine E Mosher; Joseph G Winger; Barbara A Given; Safi Shahda; Paul R Helft Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-04-22 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Lisa J Herrinton; Andrea Altschuler; Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Mark C Hornbrook; Virginia Sun; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Carol M Baldwin; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Larissa K F Temple; Robert S Krouse Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Matthew D McEvoy; Michael J Scott; Debra B Gordon; Stuart A Grant; Julie K M Thacker; Christopher L Wu; Tong J Gan; Monty G Mythen; Andrew D Shaw; Timothy E Miller Journal: Perioper Med (Lond) Date: 2017-04-13
Authors: Karlijn J van Stralen; Lotte Ruijter; Judith Frissen; Roeland H den Boer; Veerle M D Struben; Catharina J van Oostveen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Rachael Powell; Neil W Scott; Anne Manyande; Julie Bruce; Claus Vögele; Lucie M T Byrne-Davis; Mary Unsworth; Christian Osmer; Marie Johnston Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-05-26