Literature DB >> 24274990

Association between gene variants and response to buprenorphine maintenance treatment.

Gilberto Gerra1, Lorenzo Somaini2, Claudio Leonardi3, Elena Cortese3, Icro Maremmani4, Matteo Manfredini5, Claudia Donnini5.   

Abstract

A variety of studies were addressed to differentiate responders and non-responders to substitution treatment among heroin dependent patients, without conclusive findings. In particular, preliminary pharmacogenetic findings have been reported to predict treatment effectiveness in mental health and substance use disorders. Aim of the present study was to investigate the possible association of buprenorphine (BUP) treatment outcome with gene variants that may affect kappa-opioid receptors and dopamine system function. One hundred and seven heroin addicts (West European, Caucasians) who underwent buprenorphine maintenance treatment were genotyped and classified into two groups (A and B) on the basis of treatment outcome. Non-responders to buprenorphine (group B) have been identified taking into account early drop out, continuous use of heroin, severe behavioral or psychiatric problems, misbehavior and diversion during the 6 months treatment period. No difference was evidenced between responders and non-responders to BUP in the frequency of kappa opioid receptor (OPRK1) 36G>T SNP. The frequency of dopamine transporter (DAT) gene polymorphism (SLC6A3/DAT1), allele 10, was evidently much higher in "non-responder" than in "responder" individuals (64.9% vs. 55.93%) whereas the frequency of the category of other alleles (6, 7 and 11) was higher in responder than in non-responder individuals (11.02% vs. 2.13% respectively). On one hand, the hypothesis that possible gene-related changes in kappa-opioid receptor could consistently affect buprenorphine pharmacological action and clinical effectiveness was not confirmed in our study, at least in relation to the single nucleotide polymorphism 36G>T. On the other hand, the possibility that gene-related dopamine changes could have reduced BUP effectiveness and impaired maintenance treatment outcome was cautiously supported by our findings. DAT1 gene variants such as allele 10, previously reported in association with personality and behavioral problems, would have influenced the effects of BUP-induced dopamine release, modulated through mu and kappa opioid receptors, and probably the related reinforcing capacity of the drug.
© 2013 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Buprenorphine; Gene variants; K opioid receptors; Maintenance treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24274990     DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychiatry Res        ISSN: 0165-1781            Impact factor:   3.222


  13 in total

1.  Buprenorphine Response as a Function of Neurogenetic Polymorphic Antecedents: Can Dopamine Genes Affect Clinical Outcomes in Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS)?

Authors:  Kenneth Blum; Marlene Oscar-Berman; William Jacobs; Thomas McLaughlin; Mark S Gold
Journal:  J Addict Res Ther       Date:  2014

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetics of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment.

Authors:  Richard C Crist; Toni-Kim Clarke; Wade H Berrettini
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.749

3.  The Benefits of Genetic Addiction Risk Score (GARS) Testing in Substance Use Disorder (SUD).

Authors:  Kenneth Blum; Edward J Modestino; Marjorie Gondre-Lewis; Edwin J Chapman; Jennifer Neary; David Siwicki; David Baron; Mary Hauser; David E Smith; Alphonse Kenison Roy; Panayotis K Thanos; Bruce Steinberg; Thomas McLaughlin; Lyle Fried; Debmalya Barh; Georgia A Dunston; Rajendra D Badgaiyan
Journal:  Int J Genom Data Min       Date:  2018-01-15

4.  Buprenorphine signalling is compromised at the N40D polymorphism of the human μ opioid receptor in vitro.

Authors:  Alisa Knapman; Marina Santiago; Mark Connor
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Co-occurring Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder symptoms in adults affected by heroin dependence: Patients characteristics and treatment needs.

Authors:  Fabio Lugoboni; Frances Rudnick Levin; Maria Chiara Pieri; Matteo Manfredini; Lorenzo Zamboni; Lorenzo Somaini; Gilberto Gerra
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2017-01-21       Impact factor: 3.222

6.  Analysis of genetic and clinical factors associated with buprenorphine response.

Authors:  Richard C Crist; Rachel Vickers-Smith; Rachel L Kember; Christopher T Rentsch; Heng Xu; E Jennifer Edelman; Emily E Hartwell; Kyle M Kampman; Henry R Kranzler
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 4.852

7.  In Search of Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS)-free Controls: The "Holy Grail" in Genetic Addiction Risk Testing.

Authors:  Kenneth Blum; David Baron; Lisa Lott; Jessica V Ponce; David Siwicki; Brent Boyett; Bruce Steinberg; Edward J Modestino; Lyle Fried; Mary Hauser; Thomas Simpatico; Bill W Downs; Thomas McLaughlin; Raju Hajela; Rajendra D Badgaiyan
Journal:  Curr Psychopharmacol       Date:  2020

Review 8.  The kappa opioid receptor: from addiction to depression, and back.

Authors:  Laurence Lalanne; Gulebru Ayranci; Brigitte L Kieffer; Pierre-Eric Lutz
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 9.  A review of the existing literature on buprenorphine pharmacogenomics.

Authors:  Christopher W Meaden; Alexander Mozeika; Rijul Asri; Cynthia D Santos
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.550

10.  Using iPSC-derived human DA neurons from opioid-dependent subjects to study dopamine dynamics.

Authors:  Yang Sheng; Emily Filichia; Elizabeth Shick; Kenzie L Preston; Karran A Phillips; Leslie Cooperman; Zhicheng Lin; Paul Tesar; Barry Hoffer; Yu Luo
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.